Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby threadbear » Fri 19 Oct 2007, 00:30:21

Watson's views, were they taken seriously, would end up denying the blacks their humanity, to an even more profound degree than they are today.

Look at medievil whites, they were oppressed by ongoing war, the Catholic church etc.. etc...They lived marginal existences in huts too. Public torture and hangings and disembowelings were not merely tolerated, they were public entertaiments.

Many of the problems black Africans have are similar to the problems the disenfranchised have everywhere. As an individual, or a whole society, once you have reached a certain low point, and your culture has been destroyed, it's almost impossible to pull yourself up.

Watson has an IQ of only 117, which is evidence that you don't even need to be genius, by his own criteria, to achieve great things.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby lys3rg0 » Fri 19 Oct 2007, 00:42:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'W')atson's views, were they taken seriously, would end up denying the blacks their humanity, to an even more profound degree than they are today.


Some people i know would call you a racist for that. "the blacks" don't exist as a group because race is just a social construct and so on and so forth... :lol:
User avatar
lys3rg0
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue 15 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 'bout 15 miles from EU's eastern border (thankfully on the inside)

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby threadbear » Fri 19 Oct 2007, 00:50:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lys3rg0', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'W')atson's views, were they taken seriously, would end up denying the blacks their humanity, to an even more profound degree than they are today.


Some people i know would call you a racist for that. "the blacks" don't exist as a group because race is just a social construct and so on and so forth... :lol:


And they are, correct, to a degree. Africa is comprised of many different nations and tribes. It would be like comparing a tall Scandinavian with someone from the Basque region of Spain and coming to the conclusion that they are one tribe. Tremendous variation, in all ways.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 19 Oct 2007, 01:01:17

Science isn't about what makes you feel good or what you "believe with all your heart" or what the good padre or commissar told you is right. Science is about understanding the natural world around us, whether the facts are "PC" or not.

------------------------

"The overwhelming desire of society today is to assume that equal powers of reason are a universal heritage of humanity.

It may well be.

But simply wanting this to be the case is not enough. This is not science. To question this is not to give in to racism. This is not a discussion about superiority or inferiority, it is about seeking to understand differences, about why some of us are great musicians and others great engineers."

--Dr. James Watson
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 19 Oct 2007, 01:24:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'W')atson's views, were they taken seriously, would end up denying the blacks their humanity, to an even more profound degree than they are today.


Why?

Isn't recognizing and understanding the diversity of humanity a recognition of the nature of humanity itself? Why pretend the diversity isn't there? 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 19 Oct 2007, 02:06:20

There has got to be a genetic variance to cognitive ability. It's quite obvious that there is a genetic variance to body size, athleticism, etc.

There has to be genetic variance that affects density of neurons, synaptic branching and physical things like that too. There has to be a physical explanation for unusual intelligence - the kind you see in the occasional child prodigy who amazes everyone.

So there's going to be genetic variation between individuals within any racial group and there's bound to be variation between groups who are even less genetically similar.

The brain is just another physical structure. And since it's the most complex physical structure in the human organism, it must have have complex variances. And it stands to reason that Nature would prefer it that way since Nature throws the genetic dice, the structure of the brain governs behavior, behavior governs survival and survival governs the widespread adoption of any advantage.

Personally, I think if we could breed people as quickly and we do dogs, it wouldn't take very long before several entirely new races developed, probably all of which would make mental midgets out of everyone here.
Carlhole
 

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby Gigashadow » Fri 19 Oct 2007, 02:38:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'S')cience isn't about what makes you feel good or what you "believe with all your heart" or what the good padre or commissar told you is right. Science is about understanding the natural world around us, whether the facts are "PC" or not.

------------------------

"The overwhelming desire of society today is to assume that equal powers of reason are a universal heritage of humanity.

It may well be.

But simply wanting this to be the case is not enough. This is not science. To question this is not to give in to racism. This is not a discussion about superiority or inferiority, it is about seeking to understand differences, about why some of us are great musicians and others great engineers."

--Dr. James Watson
bullshit. Show me exactly how and where intelligence is connected to skin color. I want the genome location. anything less is racism.


I think people are talking about the intelligence of different genetically related groups of people. I don't think I've seen a claim that intelligence is tied to the same gene that controls skin pigmentation.
User avatar
Gigashadow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 19 Oct 2007, 02:54:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gigashadow', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'S')cience isn't about what makes you feel good or what you "believe with all your heart" or what the good padre or commissar told you is right. Science is about understanding the natural world around us, whether the facts are "PC" or not.

------------------------

"The overwhelming desire of society today is to assume that equal powers of reason are a universal heritage of humanity.

It may well be.

But simply wanting this to be the case is not enough. This is not science. To question this is not to give in to racism. This is not a discussion about superiority or inferiority, it is about seeking to understand differences, about why some of us are great musicians and others great engineers."

--Dr. James Watson
bullshit. Show me exactly how and where intelligence is connected to skin color. I want the genome location. anything less is racism.


I think people are talking about the intelligence of different genetically related groups of people. I don't think I've seen a claim that intelligence is tied to the same gene that controls skin pigmentation.


Exactly right. Ptarr's idea that the genetic component of intelligence is precisely linked to genetic markers for skin color is simplistic and inherently racist.

Fortunately, the real world of human genetics and DNA is much more complicated.

If one accepts that there is a genetic component to intelligence (and available data suggest that 60-80% of intelligence is genetically controlled), then it follows that the genetic component of intelligence is probably varying between different groups of genetically related people COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY of genetic controls on skin color, hair characteristics, etc. because intelligence and physical characteristics like height, skin color, eye color etc. are controlled by COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GENES 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby kabu » Sat 20 Oct 2007, 16:06:55

my sis had a genetics prof at ubc who maintained that intelligence and penis size were inversely proportional. i can't remember if he actually had some sort of a semi-logical argument for this, or if it was just because he was a silly, old man that had, in his youth, maybe derived this idea from racial stereotypes, so that he could console himself over his small penis!
User avatar
kabu
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby Ayoob » Sat 20 Oct 2007, 17:10:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kabu', 'm')y sis had a genetics prof at ubc who maintained that intelligence and penis size were inversely proportional. i can't remember if he actually had some sort of a semi-logical argument for this, or if it was just because he was a silly, old man that had, in his youth, maybe derived this idea from racial stereotypes, so that he could console himself over his small penis!


I think it's actually testicle size, and the correlation was inverse for monogamy. Dawkins has a chapter on this in The Ancestor's Tale.
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby lys3rg0 » Sun 21 Oct 2007, 11:56:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ayoob', 'I') think it's actually testicle size, and the correlation was inverse for monogamy.

So, does that mean that having big balls and an IQ over 130 is a sign of a genetic inclination to polygamy? 8O :-D
User avatar
lys3rg0
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue 15 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 'bout 15 miles from EU's eastern border (thankfully on the inside)
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby Gigashadow » Sun 21 Oct 2007, 18:49:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gigashadow', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'S')cience isn't about what makes you feel good or what you "believe with all your heart" or what the good padre or commissar told you is right. Science is about understanding the natural world around us, whether the facts are "PC" or not.

------------------------

"The overwhelming desire of society today is to assume that equal powers of reason are a universal heritage of humanity.

It may well be.

But simply wanting this to be the case is not enough. This is not science. To question this is not to give in to racism. This is not a discussion about superiority or inferiority, it is about seeking to understand differences, about why some of us are great musicians and others great engineers."

--Dr. James Watson
bullshit. Show me exactly how and where intelligence is connected to skin color. I want the genome location. anything less is racism.


I think people are talking about the intelligence of different genetically related groups of people. I don't think I've seen a claim that intelligence is tied to the same gene that controls skin pigmentation.
If not skin color, what marker would your 'genetically related group of people' be identified with? You claim we are not discussing a specific gene (the one that 'controls skin pigmentation'). So what unique physical characteristic, what particular phenotype do you rely on to subjugate all Africans?


Why do you feel it has to be 1) "a single marker", and 2) a physical characteristic? Also, what does this have to do with Africans specifically (wouldn't it apply to everyone?), and what does it have to do with subjugating people?
User avatar
Gigashadow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby Gigashadow » Sun 21 Oct 2007, 18:55:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Planters Peanut', '(')and available data suggest that 60-80% of intelligence is genetically controlled)
utter and complete racist nonsense. Intelligence tests are bullshit.


Wait, intelligence tests are racist now? More hyperbole please.

I'm wondering if you are living in some sort of fantasyworld where everyone is by definition equally intelligent. Regardless of whether you like it or not (and for some peculiar reason, you don't seem to like it), intelligence tests are in fact correlated with intelligence.
User avatar
Gigashadow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA
Top

Re: The Most Uncomfortable Politically-Incorrect Subject

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 21 Oct 2007, 19:39:10

Well, I would prefer someone who scored over 130 on an IQ test doing my open heart surgery rather than someone who scored under 70.

C'mon pstarr and the others, tell me it wouldn't matter to you what your doctor's IQ test score was.

Of course it matters. :)
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron