by Tyler_JC » Sat 15 Dec 2007, 16:46:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('culicomorpha', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')And that's the whole point.
Life is always the status quo. Change is gradual.
Life is not always the status quo.
And not all changes are gradual. You ever use an old-time oil can? Heard of earthquakes, volcanoes, stock market crashes, heart attacks?
For many people, a personal tragedy, loss of income, loss of health, is the end of the world as they know it, personally. But people make up the society, so all these isolated personal tragedies add up. That process looks gradual when they are statistics on a web page, but it is really discrete events that happen to real people: i.e real tragedies.
Any of the environmental problems that are coming down the pike: loss of topsoil, water shortages, drought, pollution, famine, etc, could easily turn into very large problems very quickly.
But I think you may be right that there may not be a generally recognized TEOTWAWKI moment. Nukes would do it, so would a number of major natural disaster such as the Hayward fault which is about due to go.
Sure, every day lots of folks have a "TEOTWAWKI" moment but if we're talking about society as a whole, change is gradual.
In order for society to have a TEOTWAWKI moment, there would need to be a massive nuclear war, as you said. Otherwise, the change would almost be too small to notice on a year to year basis.
Humans are great at adapting to change and assuming that current living conditions are how it has always been.
My great nephews and nieces will assume that trains and boats are the only form of inexpensive long distance transportation, that snow south of Pennsylvania is a myth, and that a Cheeto is a male version of that African great cat that died out ages ago.