Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby KillTheHumans » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 11:05:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreedomSlave', '
')
This site has a "Poster of the Year" vote, but can we add a vote for "Dumb-ass of the Year"?

Do all the math you want - mentally masturbate yourself until you're shooting equations from your eyesockets - but unless you can answer where that optimistic 4% comes from, you're just trying to blow smoke up your own ass.


Why should I force a choice onto the marketplace? People will choose their favorite solution as they trickle out.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreedomSlave', '
')
Answer this, "killer": If it is not oil that provides us with the go-juice, what will?


Who cares? Crude is mostly a transport issue....so we'll use electricity instead and everything that can generate it. The market will figure it out based on whether or not you want an EV, V2G, PHEV, and the electricity will come from whatever is cheapest/easiest/most convenient.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreedomSlave', '
')
And at the scale, rate, ease of transport and energy density of oil? And how do we "easily transition" from depletion rates of 8-10% per year(or more)?


We have electrical infrastructure everywhere, and extra supply can be dropped in anywhere along the line. Electricity is easy to transport, assuming you don't make it onsite. And the density issue is just a strawman, trying to force people into thinking that transport can only happen with liquid fuels. NOT!

And please don't make up depletion rates, technical arguments around here are sorely lacking and generally just a distraction.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreedomSlave', '
')
Do you accept that oil is a finite resource, or not?


Of course.....what are you, nuts to not know this? But standing around whining about transport fuels, and trying to find cool ways to concoct the end of the world from it, seems counter productive.
User avatar
KillTheHumans
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Rockies

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby inculcated » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 11:13:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KillTheHumans', '
')Who cares? Crude is mostly a transport issue....so we'll use electricity instead and everything that can generate it. The market will figure it out based on whether or not you want an EV, V2G, PHEV, and the electricity will come from whatever is cheapest/easiest/most convenient.


Scale? Bueller? Bueller! How will you produce transmit and/or store this electricity? Oi...
User avatar
inculcated
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Endless run-out groove...
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 11:50:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DavidFolks', ' ')We need to change the way we live, in order to live within the carrying capacity of the planet.


Still too many people, no matter how we live.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 11:54:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KillTheHumans', ' ')We have electrical infrastructure everywhere, and extra supply can be dropped in anywhere along the line. Electricity is easy to transport, assuming you don't make it onsite.


Our current electrical infrastructure cannot transport our current demand. We have massive grid problems right now. Do a little homework.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby whereagles » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 13:02:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'T')oo many people are trying to bail the Titanic with buckets


Quote of the month 8)
User avatar
whereagles
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 586
Joined: Wed 17 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portugal
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby kmann » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 13:27:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JJ', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SILENTTODD', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'J')ohnDenver recently wrote: “Oil will peak, and it will be no big deal because we will smoothly switchover to alternatives.”

John Denver, Yah, I remember him. Wasn't he killed in the crash of an "Experimental Plane"?


ran out of aviation fuel.


Actually he had fuel but was trying to switch tanks, the valve lever was difficult to access, so he couldn't switch over while paying attention to flying.
User avatar
kmann
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon 25 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby Ludi » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 15:16:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreakOil', 'W')e need population reduction and an end to exponential economic growth.



Starting with yourself.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby TheDude » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 15:26:14

Monte's economy needs to decline?

Image
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby cube » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 16:43:43

Scalability and Orders of Magnitude :wink:
Image

Is this sustainable? :)
Image
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby BigTex » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:34:28

I find MQ incredibly optimistic to believe that any significant number of people could grasp the concept of overshoot and act intelligently.

It's just not an idea that is made for mass consumption. If anything, I think it pushes many people in the other direction toward religion, technology worship or just head in the sand.

The Earth is becoming to humans what "Rat Island" is to its inhabitants.

Just like the rats have the ability to overcome many barriers to population growth and overwhelm an ecosystem, our cleverness and technology has done the same for us. Once all the sea bird eggs are gone, though (i.e., the cheap energy), the effects of the overshoot are just that much more painful.

How do we know what the limits to growth are? The masses won't know until the limit is reached. MQ imagines that telling people about it beforehand will be helpful, but it won't. What we as humans are doing is every bit as instinctive as the rats, and stands about as much chance of being stopped as controlling a rat population by putting up rat condom dispensers.

It's not that we are unable to act intelligently at the individual or group level. The problem is that higher level thinking and long term planning are mostly "full stomach" activities, and when times get tough, history usually shows that humans become more aggressive toward one another (at the tribe, society or national levels especially) and much less concerned about future generations.

I think we should all think long and hard about what "making a difference" in the context of PO means. Keep up the good work MQ (I enjoy reading your posts), but I wonder what the purpose of it is. Is it to convince us all that we are doomed? Is it to awaken us to something about which we can do nothing? Is it a call to action? If so, what is the action that should be taken? I don't disagree with your analysis or conclusions, I am just left with a sense of "now what", since I don't imagine human nature will be changing any time soon, and changing the conditions which have led us to overshoot would require such a change.

It's funny, but the thing that makes us great will be the thing that brings us down--i.e., our ability to overcome our natural predators, just like the rats. I wonder if it doesn't actually promote self-loathing to tell people that all of their instincts and desires are leading them to utter destruction. The will to build, grow populations, expand, conquer, compete, invent things, overcome natural obstacles, buy things, drive nice cars, live in nice houses, have large families....it's almost all wrong and will all collapse on itself.

Do you wonder why people are resistant to this idea? Talk about cognitive dissonance--it would be like telling the rats after they had found the Ghawar of cheese that "this will cause you to vastly overshoot, wreck the world and ultimately have a massive die-off." The rats would look at you like you were crazy.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby Ludi » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 17:56:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I') find MQ incredibly optimistic to believe that any significant number of people could grasp the concept of overshoot and act intelligently.


How do you suggest we act "intelligently"?


What should we be doing now we have grasped the concept of overshoot?


What are you doing, for instance?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby BigTex » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 19:28:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I') find MQ incredibly optimistic to believe that any significant number of people could grasp the concept of overshoot and act intelligently.


How do you suggest we act "intelligently"?


What should we be doing now we have grasped the concept of overshoot?


What are you doing, for instance?


I am not suggesting that I have any special insight into how to react to PO. In my view, if everyone in the world stopped having children (or at least had two or fewer) and the developed world basically stopped pursuing economic growth as an ideal that would be a good start.

At the individual level, if those in the developed world stopped driving inefficient vehicles, stopped buying useless crap and took other obvious measures to reduce their overall consumption of everything that would be a good start as well.

These steps would be, to me, "intelligent." Those are the things I am doing. I don't know if they will solve our problems or not, but it would position the world better for the challenges of the future. If we are already in overshoot I still think that reducing our environmental footprint as much as possible is a useful thing to do, since nature will impose its will soon enough and what is the saying about "chance favoring the prepared mind".

Here's the problem, though: EVERYONE has to do it for it to work. And there isn't a chance that more than a small minority of people are going to get enough of a head start to mitigate ugly future scenarios in any meaningful way. Thus, me living a certain way or you living a certain way is not enough. A LOT of people have to start doing that, and the changes I am talking about would be viewed by many people as a complete step backward from where they are now economically.

Telling people in industrialized nations that they need to stop living in big houses, stop driving big cars, stop throwing away so much trash, stop borrowing so much money, etc. is just not a message I am optimistic about people embracing early enough to make a difference.

Oil has gone from $15 to $90a barrel, and I see very little change in the U.S. in attitudes or consumption patterns. If a six-fold increase in the price of oil in such a short period doesn't wake people up, I'm not sure what will.

China is not going to just stop its economic expansion, nor is any other country voluntarily. Thus, the dogma of endless economic growth will continue until it bumps into an immovable barrier such as PO.

All I'm saying is that MQ is optimistic to believe that people are psychologically equipped to hear and process his message and take action that would lead to meaningful mitigation in the numbers that would be needed to make a difference.

If we are in an overshoot state where nothing can be done to prevent a die-off scenario and no mitigation strategies matter, then why bother discussing it?

I'm not saying give up. In fact, I think continuing to strive and compete against great odds displays great courage and character.

I just wonder if MQ appreciates the fact that if 50% of the world woke up tomorrow and fully embraced his ideas and took every possible step to mitigate PO/overshoot, I don't think it would be enough. I don't know if 80% would be enough.

Perhaps there is an inevitable "peak human" curve that will resemble the PO curve and trail it by 20 years or so.

Interesting times.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby Ludi » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 20:28:17

Thanks for your reply, BigTex.


I don't know that Monte is very optimistic either.
Ludi
 

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby KillTheHumans » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 21:37:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KillTheHumans', ' ')We have electrical infrastructure everywhere, and extra supply can be dropped in anywhere along the line. Electricity is easy to transport, assuming you don't make it onsite.


Our current electrical infrastructure cannot transport our current demand. We have massive grid problems right now. Do a little homework.


I did. I paid attention all summer and didn't see blackouts, crashing grids, or anything else related to overtaxed systems even when at max load, which happened in several places during the summer.

The transfer of nearly all transport systems to electrically based ones doesn't require a 20% increase in generating capacity, and it certainly doesn't require that increase to be based at the end of a power line. Slap panels on the roof and make your own!!

Also, the base load, which is primarily run non stop, is wasted to some extent when load drops in the evening.....by simply NOT dropping output in those hours you can be up and ready for the people charging their cars when they come home from work.

Its quite an elegant solution. I perfer solar myself.
User avatar
KillTheHumans
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Rockies
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 23:20:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('IslandCrow', ' ')However, I still have the question of "are they scalable enough if combined with conservation?"

This question means that the would not have to provide as much energy as oil currently does, so there is more hope that they could get to the level required. It also asks the question of whether a program of conservation can be effective (or whether it will take more energy in the short term), and whether enough people have the foresight to do it.


I can't find the link, but a couple of physicists ran the numbers and found that if we reduced consumption by 25%, growth would eclipse the gains in 13 years.

Then there is Jevons' Paradox.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 23:30:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', ' ') Keep up the good work MQ (I enjoy reading your posts), but I wonder what the purpose of it is.


As I am on record as saying:

"I write to stimulate thought, and to try to explain the parameters and natural laws which must govern the debate as we discuss solutions and consider the alternatives to our imminent energy decline. "
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 23:39:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', ' ')I just wonder if MQ appreciates the fact that if 50% of the world woke up tomorrow and fully embraced his ideas and took every possible step to mitigate PO/overshoot, I don't think it would be enough. I don't know if 80% would be enough.


I have never said we could mitigate or prevent the overshoot die-off.

That is cast in stone.

But I do believe there is a chance to avoid the possibility that it will be the last die-off, by preserving carrying capacity as much as possible.

Powerdown, restrict per capita consumption, and reduce the population.

In other words, don't go farther into overshoot.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 23:51:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KillTheHumans', 'I') did. I paid attention all summer and didn't see blackouts, crashing grids, or anything else related to overtaxed systems even when at max load, which happened in several places during the summer.


Homework. Research.

Here in Arizona, we are so short of transmission capacity to bring in out of stste energy during peak times, that we have had to resort to building natual gas-fired generators around the perimeter of many areas just to handle peak load.

Here's some homework for you.

The Western Transmission Grid Urgent Call for Investment.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby OneStepAtATime » Thu 29 Nov 2007, 00:16:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', ' ')I can't find the link, but a couple of physicists ran the numbers and found that if we reduced consumption by 25%, growth would eclipse the gains in 13 years.

Then there is Jevons' Paradox.


You don't need to be a physicist to figure out how growth compounds. Assume a growth rate of 3%/year. Assume an "instant" reduction in consumption of 25%. Using a "brute force" method of multiplying 75 x 1.03, then multiplying that product by 1.03, etc. on an Excel spreadsheet, we find that a 25% instant reduction in consumption returns to base in approximately 10 periods (years) of 3% compounding.

The issue is how do you make negative growth appealing to people? And I think that this is a proposition that CAN be appealing on bases other than environmental correctness. For example, how would you like to work half as hard as you currently do? How would you like to be energy independent of [fill in the blank of your favorite energy villian, be it Dick Cheney, Osama Bin Laden, Israel or Conoco]? These are ideas that appeal, and can have broad based appeal.

Conservation and smart utilization are ideas that will sell.
User avatar
OneStepAtATime
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed 28 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil : Scalability and Orders of Magnitude

Postby FreakOil » Thu 29 Nov 2007, 04:23:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FreakOil', 'W')e need population reduction and an end to exponential economic growth.



Starting with yourself.


Are you suggesting that I "die off"?
User avatar
FreakOil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun 04 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Hong Kong
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron