by BigTex » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 19:28:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I') find MQ incredibly optimistic to believe that any significant number of people could grasp the concept of overshoot and act intelligently.
How do you suggest we act "intelligently"?
What should we be doing now we have grasped the concept of overshoot?
What are you doing, for instance?
I am not suggesting that I have any special insight into how to react to PO. In my view, if everyone in the world stopped having children (or at least had two or fewer) and the developed world basically stopped pursuing economic growth as an ideal that would be a good start.
At the individual level, if those in the developed world stopped driving inefficient vehicles, stopped buying useless crap and took other obvious measures to reduce their overall consumption of everything that would be a good start as well.
These steps would be, to me, "intelligent." Those are the things I am doing. I don't know if they will solve our problems or not, but it would position the world better for the challenges of the future. If we are already in overshoot I still think that reducing our environmental footprint as much as possible is a useful thing to do, since nature will impose its will soon enough and what is the saying about "chance favoring the prepared mind".
Here's the problem, though: EVERYONE has to do it for it to work. And there isn't a chance that more than a small minority of people are going to get enough of a head start to mitigate ugly future scenarios in any meaningful way. Thus, me living a certain way or you living a certain way is not enough. A LOT of people have to start doing that, and the changes I am talking about would be viewed by many people as a complete step backward from where they are now economically.
Telling people in industrialized nations that they need to stop living in big houses, stop driving big cars, stop throwing away so much trash, stop borrowing so much money, etc. is just not a message I am optimistic about people embracing early enough to make a difference.
Oil has gone from $15 to $90a barrel, and I see very little change in the U.S. in attitudes or consumption patterns. If a six-fold increase in the price of oil in such a short period doesn't wake people up, I'm not sure what will.
China is not going to just stop its economic expansion, nor is any other country voluntarily. Thus, the dogma of endless economic growth will continue until it bumps into an immovable barrier such as PO.
All I'm saying is that MQ is optimistic to believe that people are psychologically equipped to hear and process his message and take action that would lead to meaningful mitigation in the numbers that would be needed to make a difference.
If we are in an overshoot state where nothing can be done to prevent a die-off scenario and no mitigation strategies matter, then why bother discussing it?
I'm not saying give up. In fact, I think continuing to strive and compete against great odds displays great courage and character.
I just wonder if MQ appreciates the fact that if 50% of the world woke up tomorrow and fully embraced his ideas and took every possible step to mitigate PO/overshoot, I don't think it would be enough. I don't know if 80% would be enough.
Perhaps there is an inevitable "peak human" curve that will resemble the PO curve and trail it by 20 years or so.
Interesting times.