by lawnchair » Thu 31 Jan 2008, 17:12:10
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('skyemoor', 'T')his provides ammo for every locality that wants to deny new coal plants in their area.
Ammo for the nukees, too. The axe may have been helped along by their lobbying, though carbon capture is damned expensive. Still, too damn bad Bush couldn't have used his lame duck SOTU to say, "screw you Reid, we finish Yucca Mountain starting tomorrow". 49 congressional delegations would have applauded that. Not that Yucca is great. It's adequate geologically, but I'd rather we reprocessed rather than throwing very fertile fission fuel in a deep hole. But, building it would bolster the industry.
Mind you, in my state (Kansas) the governor rejected some large cleaner-ish-kinda (modern but not carbon capture) coal plants. The power is needed in the Denver sprawl, but Colorado has passed some prissy carbon emissions laws. The KS legislature (and a large chunk of the population) is out for blood to get them built, all for the promise of a couple dozen post-construction jobs and continued political cash from the energy company. Plenty of places are more than willing to burn coal with no restrictions at all for a few bob.
At 1% annual growth, human bodies will incorporate every gram in the observable universe in approximately 10,170 years.