Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 03:12:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Andrew_S', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Have we forgotten the Marshall Plan so soon?

Can you imagine what the world would have looked like if Americans hadn't given billions of dollars (1940s dollars) to our long time friends and foes alike?

Bretton Woods dollars (paper money to be treated as good as gold) = imperial servitude.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Millions of Europeans were slowly starving because of the incredible devastation of the War.

After the end of WWII large numbers of Germans were deliberately starved to death, although food supplies were available. In the Western occupation sectors prisoners of war were tortured, starved and left to die of exposure (can't comment on the Eastern sector as haven't had sources). Soldiers were told "no Geneva convention" .
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Would you have wanted the Soviet Union to take over Italy, France, West Germany, and Greece?

The Soviet Union was feted by the "American" press as a great force for "democracy". Ever noticed that the pretext by which the UK and France declared war on Germany was not applied to the Soviet Union? (Poland, a new creation of the Versailles Treaty, was partioned by the Soviets simulataneously). The Germans, unlike the Soviets, were in part (not entirely, I believe) recovering their own historical territory and protecting persecuted ethnic Germans? (A problem ignored by the League of Nations in spite of repeated requests from Germany.)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Without the Marshall Plan, America would have lost the Cold War.

Why, a conflict with the great ally, the Soviet Union?

And to come back to your first point:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Have we forgotten the Marshall Plan so soon?

Can you imagine what the world would have looked like if Americans hadn't given billions of dollars (1940s dollars) to our long time friends and foes alike?


Can you imagine what the world would look like if New York had not planned, instigated and funded the "Russian" revolution?


1. A system of fixed exchange rates supported by the world's largest gold reserve (USA) was better than each bankrupt European country attempting to create its own currency. Clearly the Bretton Woods system benefited both the United States and Europe in the long term.

2. Prove your allegations of intentional starvation. Moreover, I wasn't just talking about West Germany, I was talking about Europe as a whole. Much of the continent's agriculture land and food industry infrastructure was devastated after the war. Germany's food production was only 35% of its prewar figure in 1945. In the winter of 1945, 18,000 Dutch citizens starved to death.

Jack can sit back in his little bunker and say "well, at least they didn't survive to have lots of fat, resource-consuming children" but considering that the Dutch share so many of our values and ideals...I think it's pretty horrible.

3. You believe that the German invasion of Poland was justified? Dear God. This post is over.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby topcat » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 10:38:34

Tyler -

The point I tried to make, is that everyone wants a hand-out, but...
when the US hits a rough patch, I never hear of any aid coming our way.
"No workey, no beef jerkey." TC

"Home is where the hot dogs are." TC
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Andrew_S » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 13:12:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')1. A system of fixed exchange rates supported by the world's largest gold reserve (USA) was better than each bankrupt European country attempting to create its own currency. Clearly the Bretton Woods system benefited both the United States and Europe in the long term.

I'm trying to counter the idea that America's role was only that of a "good guy".
As I'm sure you know, America benefitted greatly financially from WWII and it led to de facto imperialist dominion after the war - half for the ally, the Soviet Union, and half for them.
Much of the financing of Germany in the '30s came from New York and later material support of the UK - so both sides had been supported by America. America's role was not that of an innocent good guy.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')2. Prove your allegations of intentional starvation. Moreover, I wasn't just talking about West Germany, I was talking about Europe as a whole. Much of the continent's agriculture land and food industry infrastructure was devastated after the war. Germany's food production was only 35% of its prewar figure in 1945. In the winter of 1945, 18,000 Dutch citizens starved to death.

THE HIGH COST OF VENGEANCE
by Freda Utley
HENRY REGNERY COMPANY
CHICAGO
1949

This is a pdf fredautley.com

An html version here: vho.org


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')Jack can sit back in his little bunker and say "well, at least they didn't survive to have lots of fat, resource-consuming children" but considering that the Dutch share so many of our values and ideals...I think it's pretty horrible.

3. You believe that the German invasion of Poland was justified? Dear God. This post is over.


On point 3 you fail to present an argument. Some of that territory was German, taken from them after WWI. Ethnic Germans had been subjected to persecution. Is that all to be ignored?

And what about the Soviet Union's role in the partition of Poland?

I'm trying to provide some information on the real history which is unfamiliar to most people. The media provide the public with a heavily biased presentation. The reality is somewhat different and the Allies don't look so pretty.
Andrew_S
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby kadoomsoon » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 13:15:57

Winning WWII gave us the right to send them all our money to rebuild, what a deal.
Last edited by kadoomsoon on Wed 19 Dec 2007, 18:11:45, edited 1 time in total.
___________________________
Everything is going to happen more or less simultaneously.
Your relatives,their broken down car, and their credit card debt are coming to live with you in 2008
User avatar
kadoomsoon
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon 01 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Rural farm

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 14:54:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('topcat', 'T')yler -

The point I tried to make, is that everyone wants a hand-out, but...
when the US hits a rough patch, I never hear of any aid coming our way.


Kuwait Gives $500 Million in Katrina Relief

World Mobilizes to Aid US Victims

China Offers $5 million for Hurricane Relief

Qatar Offers $100 million to relief fund

And so on...

There was a massive outpouring of support internationally after Hurricane Katrina including significant donations to the Red Cross from countries like Australia, Japan, and others.

The United States choose not to accept most of the direct aid because frankly we didn't need it.

But the pledges were there and we could have accepted it.

The trouble with accepting foreign aid from countries that are generally recipients of US largess is that aid should be a trickle down effect from rich to poor, not the other way around.

Respectfully declining the donations from countries like Kenya and the Bahamas suit American interests better.

I'm not saying America was the 100% good guy throughout all of recent history, but on average, I believe America has done more good than bad (the recent misguided "adventures" in Iraq aside).

As for the de-industrialization/demilitarization of Germany after WW2, what else did you expect the world to do?

We forced Japan to accept a pacifist constitution in order to prevent future aggression, was that the wrong thing to do?

The European Coal and Steel Community, by binding Germany to the Western economies, prevented West Germany from solidifying with East Germany, forming a single neutral nation. Or worse, adding to Soviet control of central Europe, possibly turning the tide of the Cold War.

No German Miracle. No Treaty of Rome. No strong West German Industrial Machine to subsidize European development. No European Community. No European Union.

Without continued occupation of West Germany after the end of the Second World War, even with the theft of intellectual and industrial property, West Germany could very easily have fallen to the Soviets.

The consequences would have been absolutely disastrous and we would be living in an extremely different world today.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby topcat » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 17:38:44

Tyler -

Thank you for correcting me.

I need to read more and take time to seach before I speak.

It is refreshing that others offered, disappointing that TPTB passed on some of the offers.

I realize that we/US is better off than some, worse off than others.

IMO, each should help the other when needed.
"No workey, no beef jerkey." TC

"Home is where the hot dogs are." TC
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 18:39:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('topcat', 'T')yler -

Thank you for correcting me.

I need to read more and take time to seach before I speak.

It is refreshing that others offered, disappointing that TPTB passed on some of the offers.

I realize that we/US is better off than some, worse off than others.

IMO, each should help the other when needed.


I'm glad we agree with each other. :)

I've always thought of foreign aid as another form of diplomacy...and one that costs far less than battleships or tank battalions.

There is always the opinion that floats around in the world that each country should go it alone at all costs.

I tend to think that cooperation can be mutually beneficial.

Even if one country is made only slightly worse off but another country can benefit enormously, the trade might be worth it.

For example, plans to provide debt relief to some heavily indebted poor countries in Africa and Latin America cost the G-7 and IMF relatively little money (a few dollars per person). By contrast, the benefit of eliminating the impossible debt burdens imposed on Zambia, Niger, Uganda, etc. are enormous.

Freeing these places to invest in their own domestic economies rather than send interest payments to rich banking interests will increase stability. More stability means less child mortality and less child mortality means smaller families (and less population growth in the long run).

If the West decides to be short-sighted and think only of next year's bottom line rather than the long term sustainability of the planet, hell, let the third world crash. Let them cut down their forests, pollute their rivers, strip their top soil to grow cash crops instead of food, and keep those interest payments coming.

Providing development aid helps to increase our carrying capacity (better crop yields and better agricultural techniques) and reduce overpopulation.

Sure, sometimes the money gets siphoned off to bad people so they can buy guns and attack their neighbors. But if the money is well spent, it can have a very positive impact. Not just for the recipient but for the entire world.

...

As a side note, screwing over weak countries can have an incredible backlash. Hitler used the German economic catastrophe caused by excessive war reparations as a launching board to build his political career. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 were justified in the eyes of some in the Muslim world because of poor US foreign policy in the Middle East.

Long story short, foreign policy matters. We can't just isolate ourselves behind two big oceans and tell the rest of the world to buzz off.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Chesire » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 19:22:19

The charities I support are all American for Americans . As long as there are hungry , homeless and people in need of healthcare in America the rest of the world can get fucked . Charity begins at home.
User avatar
Chesire
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri 13 Jul 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Gigashadow » Tue 13 Nov 2007, 19:58:56

While I agree with the sentiment in general, I don't give two shits if someone has the same citizenship as me -- if I'm giving out free money to people, it's far more important that they share the same values, than happening to live at the opposite end of the same landmass that is claimed by a government.

It reminds me of these "Our products are made by <insert citizenship here>". Please die. I'll buy products from whoever makes the best. If you want my business, just make better shit please.

Similarly with charities. Now if I know someone personally, or they are at least part of the local community, then fine, that at least makes sense. But for me, citizenship is too arbitrary a thing to care about.
User avatar
Gigashadow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Bas » Wed 14 Nov 2007, 19:55:26

I apologize for being so personal about this to our resident Americans.
Bas
 

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Bas » Wed 14 Nov 2007, 20:45:07

bttt
Bas
 

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Bas » Wed 14 Nov 2007, 22:13:39

I suppose this has no appeal, makes sense...
Bas
 

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby culicomorpha » Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:04:59

Bas,

I think you're absolutely right. For all the hysterical ranting and raving about how generous the American people believe themselves to be, when you take out the weapons and the torture training, there really isn't all that much in aid that I would consider productive. Certainly none of the money going to Israel. And the key point is the money always comes with strings. That's the whole point of the money. (Again, except for Israel)

If only 10% of what the wars are costing was put into appropriate technology assistance for the third world, lots of people would be better off.

And I think that is why there is a reaction. I think the sense in America for some time now has been that any improvements outside the US will come at the expense of US standard of living. It's like the seesaw effect, if others go up, it means we go down. I don't think Americans will ever believe that "high tide lifts all ships."

Maybe it was Ross Perot with his "big sucking sound" that left an impression. Coupled with the continual slashing of social programs, I think many Americans are really dealing with a kind of trauma that comes from having very little in the way of real security, and so we make up a bunch of fairy tales about how great we are. Actually, the stories are made all pre-packaged for us, but you get the idea.

Just my $0.02.
User avatar
culicomorpha
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat 03 Nov 2007, 03:00:00
Location: cascadia

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Bas » Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:13:46

kewl, culu, I think most of the world has trouble with America's desperate attempts to stay the most "popular"
Bas
 

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Jack » Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:30:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'S')ure, sometimes the money gets siphoned off to bad people so they can buy guns and attack their neighbors.


Well, that is one good argument if favor of some kinds of aid.

We get to subsidize our arms industry and encourage a proxy war. That sort of thing makes me feel all warm and happy. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Bas » Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:32:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'S')ure, sometimes the money gets siphoned off to bad people so they can buy guns and attack their neighbors.


Well, that is one good argument if favor of some kinds of aid.

We get to subsidize our arms industry and encourage a proxy war. That sort of thing makes me feel all warm and happy. 8)


Yes we know Jack, you're on several recommendation lists for it.
Bas
 
Top

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby kadoomsoon » Wed 14 Nov 2007, 23:40:46

The cost of the war could have educated every child in america clear through a 4 year college degree. All children from 1 year to 24 years old.
___________________________
Everything is going to happen more or less simultaneously.
Your relatives,their broken down car, and their credit card debt are coming to live with you in 2008
User avatar
kadoomsoon
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon 01 Oct 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Rural farm

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Bas » Thu 15 Nov 2007, 00:02:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kadoomsoon', 'T')he cost of the war could have educated every child in america clear through a 4 year college degree. All children from 1 year to 24 years old.
Bas
 
Top

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby culicomorpha » Thu 15 Nov 2007, 00:38:25

Bas, I don't think we are winning any popularity contests. In fact, quite the contrary.

This government has shown a pretty consistent pattern of ignoring world opinion and 'going it alone.' There was a hilarious bit on 'Daily Show with Jon Stewart' recently, where he talked about the "coalition of the willing." He pointed out that the numbers were like 95% US involvement in Iraq, and the next largest group of soldiers, the UK, had around 5500 troops, but the Parliament was cutting that by 2500 or so, making US involvement more like 98%. Finland, if I recall correctly, was counted among the "coalition," but was represented by a single woman, who had since returned home.
So much for the coalition of the willing.
User avatar
culicomorpha
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat 03 Nov 2007, 03:00:00
Location: cascadia

Re: Why are Americans so cheap when it comes to foreign aid?

Unread postby Chesire » Thu 15 Nov 2007, 00:43:47

Perhaps we are "cheap"

Yet some things to consider

How many billions are spent to pay foreign nationals employed on US bases over seas ?

How much is contributed to local economies by US citizens stationed over seas ?

How many billions of dollars flow out to other countries from illegal immigrants in america ?

How man billions are spent on public assistance for non us citizens in the country illegally ?

How many billions are stolen by intellectual property theft from american companies ?

When are the French going to pay up the 4 trillion + they owe the US ?

When are the Chinese going to pay up on the nationalist bonds the US holds ?

When is Europe going to pay the US to station troops in their countries ?

No matter what wind , rain or shine if you have anything that others can convince themselves they are entitled to . There will never be a shortage of people with their hands out in a queue .
User avatar
Chesire
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri 13 Jul 2007, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests