by thuja » Tue 06 Nov 2007, 17:33:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'T')huja et al., I just don't buy the argument that pausing to reflect philosophically on doom (i.e., "talking") is inconsistent with actively preparing for it.
Never said that. If you'll look at some of my threads (recent one- Die-off, the Thuja Scenario), I do embrace talking about doom- it is an essential aspect of what we do here- realistically diagramming likely future scenarios. I think is is essential and I think we need cornucopians, optimistic doomers, cynical doomers and uberdoomers to battle it out on the threads.
I'll try and make my suggestion clear-
Divide PFTF forum into smaller forums that are more specific-
Planning for the Future is a huge topic. If you look at that forum, there are 42 or so pages. Without doing a specific search, you would have to scroll back page after page to find an interesting thread from back in the day.
Different forums allow people to find their niche.
How about:
Planning for Defense:
Community Preparation:
Off-Grid Living:
Agriculture:
Etc etc. Instead of a thread entitled farming (my God that could encompass 5 million different subjects)- make it a forum. Then mitigationists will find their way. City dwellers will find their way, rural homesteaders will find their way. Gun enthusiasts will...etc etc...
So again- 42 pages of PFTF? 800 or so different threads all in one category? Pops, if, as you say, that PFTF is the single most important forum on this site- why make it so large and unwieldy?