Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby thuja » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:54:31

Waves too...lots of waves- we're working hard on a prototype to get electricity from the Sea.
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 17:59:40

Wave energy is way cool.

Oregon may also have huge geothermal resources in the central Cascades. There is geothermal development going on right now at Newberry Caldera in eastern Oregon.

Oregon has very large solar potential in the eastern deserts.

Wind.

Biofuels. Tree oil.

There is a little bit of natural gas and oil still be found in Oregon.

And there are always nukes.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby jupiters_release » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 19:24:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'W')e hit peak oil in 2006 or late in 2005. The world will have only 50% as much oil production in 30 years compared to today.

Is that enough to cause famine and die-off in Portland?

Can Portland replace 50% of the oil it uses with more solar, hydro, nuclear, geothermal, biofuel, bicycles, etc. and keep energy use at today's levels? :!:

Can Portland powerdown and use half as much energy and not have famines? :!:


The Peak OIl Resolution passed last year here calls for a 50% reduction in oil and natural gas by 2030. Essentially this will happen whether we like it or not. Can this take place without widespread starvation in the street? Undoubtedly. Many cities in the world have undergone siege warfare and not experienced an utter collapse in population.

Will it be ugly? Undoubtedly as well.


I think the underlying argument is that solutions in isolation are deceiving. Any way you look at even a small town of half a million people will never be sustainable without the current global infrastructure of cheap energy. You're talking about 2030 which is over two decades away but we're already past peak. A town is only as sustainable as what the local farms can support, in the best case scenario variable on global warming, war(I've been hearing CNN reporters talking about WW III now), disease, MBZ's, rogue mercenaries(local, national, and international), detention centers, federal population reduction policies, list does not stop.

Speaking of doom, new series tonight Planet In Peril on CNN. :-D
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 19:41:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', '[') A town is only as sustainable as what the local farms can support


In the 18th century, prior to any large use of oil, farms in the American colonies were supplying London with hams, wheat and other foods. Even back during the Roman Empire, Rome was importing wheat and other foods from distant parts of their empire.

Human history shows that considerable trade can occur only with sails and horses for power. Portland still have solar, fuel cell, biofuel, nukes etc. to help transport food and keep trade going.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby jupiters_release » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 20:00:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', '[') A town is only as sustainable as what the local farms can support


In the 18th century, prior to any large use of oil, farms in the American colonies were supplying London with hams, wheat and other foods. Even back during the Roman Empire, Rome was importing wheat and other foods from distant parts of their empire.

Human history shows that considerable trade can occur only with sails and horses for power. Portland still have solar, fuel cell, biofuel, nukes etc. to help transport food and keep trade going.


But does Portland have the imperial power of London or Rome not to mention all the other variables including our industrial civilization with 6+ billion people?? This would be called a solution for the wrong century argument. :-D
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 21:57:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', '[') A town is only as sustainable as what the local farms can support


In the 18th century, prior to any large use of oil, farms in the American colonies were supplying London with hams, wheat and other foods. Even back during the Roman Empire, Rome was importing wheat and other foods from distant parts of their empire.

Human history shows that considerable trade can occur only with sails and horses for power. Portland still have solar, fuel cell, biofuel, nukes etc. to help transport food and keep trade going.


But does Portland have the imperial power of London or Rome not to mention all the other variables including our industrial civilization with 6+ billion people?? This would be called a solution for the wrong century argument. :-D


Portland is part of the United States of America. The United States is wealthy and powerful today just like London or Rome were in their day.

It is precisely because we live in an industrial civilization that we have technologies like wood and coal-fired steam power and electrical generators, solar, fuel cell, wind, biofuel, nukes etc. to help transport food and keep trade going in the post-peak era. These modern energy technologies weren't available to the Roman Empire 20 centuries ago. :-D
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby thuja » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 22:41:18

Yes Eastbay is right- the fear for me is not so much about imminent starvation as it is increasing overpopulation due to climate change/PO related disasters. It is likely that we will see an ever increasing influx of the tired, the hungry, the teeming masses. I think the Willammette Valley and environs could support Oregon's population of 4 milllion right now...but 6 million, 8, 10, 20? No...
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 22:46:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', 'Y')es Eastbay is right- the fear for me is not so much about imminent starvation as it is increasing overpopulation due to climate change/PO related disasters. It is likely that we will see an ever increasing influx of the tired, the hungry, the teeming masses..


Does this mean you think that Portland shouldn't take in and help any influx of masses of tired and hungry folks who lost their homes in the ongoing climate change/PO Superfire disaster in San Diego and southern California the way communities in the south and east took in folks from the Katrina disaster and helped them out?
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby thuja » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 23:32:08

No of course not- let them come- but I do see a point where its a lot like the rowboats fleeing the Titanic. Pick up too many people and your little boat sinks.

But is there any way to deny other American citizens access to the Northwest as they flee drought ravaged and arid barren landscapes that can't be propped up by fossil fuels? Is there any way to say no to people who are fleeing rising sea levels and hurricanes? I can't think of any reasonable, logical or legal thing that can be done.

So people will come. They have been coming in ever increasing numbers. And eventually we will be overwhelmed and small problems will become mighty ones.

This will not affect just Portland, but every habitable area in Oregon and in the NorthWest. The right to Fresh Water will become the rallying cry- How can you deny your fellow citizens?
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby eastbay » Tue 23 Oct 2007, 23:32:34

Yes. A statewide moratorium on net-gain housing construction (we all know what that is, right?) would be an excellent place to start. Maybe get Washington in on it too. That approach will leave population mostly unchanged. It would put some teeth into all these feel-good resolutions. That would greatly reduce the level of immigrants into the area without excluding anyone. Sure, prices may climb but it's better than greatly social intensified chaos.

A governor and legislature hip to PO would be required and here in Oregon that is a dream... at this point. Maybe when the gas lines and fuel rationing start attitudes will change.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby thuja » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 00:20:49

Our main way of reducing population influx has been rapidly increasing home and land prices. My belief is that climate/PO related chaos will drastically increase demand for Northwest land/homes which will cause rents and home prices to escalate to a fever pitch.

As is happening now, the poor will be forced to the outer, less habitable edges, and it will be difficult for any but the upper middle class and rich to relocate here. This will lead to a Third World atmosphere in which the rich have access to food and remaining resources while the vast poor have difficulty meeting their basic needs. Thus crime, , riots, even revolution is possible.

I don't think this thing can be legislated. It will be the law of supply and demand.
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby eastbay » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 00:41:53

The number of housing units constructed in this area is heavily regulated requiring approval at the city council level while meeting quota's set by the regional authority.

The quota's can be adjusted as needed... and it is very much needed at this time that they are greatly reduced. Reduction will be mandatory in the years ahead anyhow so, again, Portland could reveal its real 'green' self to the rest of the US with this bold approach designed to mitigate the size and scope of the disaster.

Zero net gain is a simple concept. It means no residential construction can occur unless an equal number of aged and dilapidated housing is first destroyed. Replacement building could continue, but increasing density would cease. This policy combined with a strictly enforced urban growth limit will assure little increase in population as this calamity kicks in.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 00:44:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', 'O')ur main way of reducing population influx has been rapidly increasing home and land prices.



Home prices are increasing everywhere in the U.S. The prices in Oregon are still cheaper then they are in California, which is one reason why so many people are moving from California to Oregon.


Between 1990 and 2000, Oregon's population grew from 2,842,321 to 3,421,399, an increase of 20.4%, making it one of the fastest-growing states in the nation.

The population is projected to reach 3,613,000 by 2005 and 4.3 million by 2025. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby eastbay » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 01:42:52

Don't bother us with 3rd grade population stats. We know how many people live here.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 12:11:56

The Portland metropolitan area continued to experience the largest population increases. Washington County gained 34,858 people since 2000, followed by Multnomah County (25,464) and Clackamas County (17,859).

The largest city population increase occurred in the state’s largest city—Portland’s population reached 550,560 the year ending July 1, 2004, an increase of 21,439 people since the 2000 Census. Bend and Hillsboro ranked second and third in numbers of new residents, with respective gains of 13,181 and 9,754. All three cities had substantial numbers of new housing units. The population of Oregon's incorporated cities and towns totaled 2,434,922 on July 1, 2004, accounting for 68 percent of the state’s population. :P
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby thuja » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 13:00:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', 'T')he number of housing units constructed in this area is heavily regulated requiring approval at the city council level while meeting quota's set by the regional authority.

The quota's can be adjusted as needed... and it is very much needed at this time that they are greatly reduced. Reduction will be mandatory in the years ahead anyhow so, again, Portland could reveal its real 'green' self to the rest of the US with this bold approach designed to mitigate the size and scope of the disaster.

Zero net gain is a simple concept. It means no residential construction can occur unless an equal number of aged and dilapidated housing is first destroyed. Replacement building could continue, but increasing density would cease. This policy combined with a strictly enforced urban growth limit will assure little increase in population as this calamity kicks in.


I love the idea- but right now Portland is on a density tear- condos are going up everywhere. The only bonus is that the housing downturn has caused a lot of these units to stay empty. But I think the Portland planners are seeing that we are going to have population growth no matter what so where do we put people? They think its better to create density in the city rather than build out and disturb the Urban Growth Boundary.

I personally would like to see no growth as well but I understand that if we have a choice, density is probably better in order to protect farmlands. I don't think no-growth is quite there yet. Its one of those things that defies the basic premise of modernity. Could this change? Certainly if there is one place it could change I would guess Portland.
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon
Top

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 13:06:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', ' ') I don't think no-growth is quite there yet.


I agree. The numbers show that Oregon and Portland are growing faster then most other parts of the country. :roll:
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby thuja » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 13:08:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', ' ') I don't think no-growth is quite there yet.


I agree. The numbers show that Oregon and Portland are growing faster then most other parts of the country. :roll:


?
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon
Top

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 13:14:59

In reality, Portland isn't an expensive place to live. Housing prices in Portland are near average for the U.S., while wages are almost 20% higher then the U.S. average.

No wonder Portland is experience such rapid population growth.

In 2005 US metro areas had a median household income of $57,500 and a median house price of $225,000. In Portland the median income is $67,900 and the median house price is $201,000. 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: People in Seattle and Portland immune from hard times

Postby Plantagenet » Wed 24 Oct 2007, 13:18:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', ' ') I don't think no-growth is quite there yet.


I agree. The numbers show that Oregon and Portland are growing faster then most other parts of the country. :roll:


?


Between 1990 and 2000, Oregon's population grew from 2,842,321 to 3,421,399, an increase of 20.4%, making it one of the fastest-growing states in the nation. Similar population growth occurred in the Portland metropolitan area and in Portland itself.

The population is projected to reach 3,613,000 by 2005 and 4.3 million by 2025.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron