by EnergyUnlimited » Tue 25 Sep 2007, 03:41:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shannymara', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', 'I')f you're asking seriously: the punishment can only be administered with either a non-coerced confession (which would never happen knowing the penalty) or 4 witnesses to the act, which likely won't ever happen.
Does it have to be intercourse, or would kissing fall under this law? Do people sometimes conspire and falsely testify they witnessed such an act to get at someone?
I'm asking seriously, by the way, out of curiosity.
In Iran you can get contract married for 2 weeks (or 1 hour if more desirable), then have an intercourse (and subsequent divorce...) and everything will be fine.
Their mullahs are essentially acting as pimps by endorsing that practice.
It is not unknown that certain Iranian women are getting married and divorced several times a day.
One of my neighbors is working for military contractors and travels much to various African countries where Muslim communities are present.
So for example in Kongo Republic (Chad) local Muslim communities are permitting their women (presumably out of necessity...) to carry on prostitution as long as they restrict themselves to provide oral sex only.
There is always a way around any law (even Sharia one)...unless you are
caught homosexual or attempt to make love with your camel.
If so then bad luck...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mekrob', '.')..4 witnesses to the act, which likely won't ever happen.
Any witness must be:
1. Muslim
2. Male
So betrayed wife, who caught her husband in act will not qualify as a witness but a husband together with his father and two brothers certainly will.
Legal procedure can be simple and inexpensive and subsequent justice swift...
My overall observations regarding Sharia Law are that this system is inexpensive to implement and simple to run.
Long term imprisonment in particular is usually avoided, trivial crimes are penalized by cheap to administer corporal punishment, sometimes efficient measures preventing repeating a crime are taken (chopping off thieves hands is good example) and severe cases, where there is not much prospect of improvement and/or severe damage was already done are dealt with by death penalty.
The most contentious part (from western perspective at least) are sex crimes and issues related to women rights. In any case it is worth to remember that any society has sovereign right to establish their own code of penal practice etc, so westerners should tolerate systems with different sets of values than they believe are right.
In any case American married woman who committed adultery with a local during her holiday in Tunisia is not going to be stoned to death.
At the very worst she will receive few lashes and after several weeks of detention she will be deported back to US.
Alternatively West may try to negotiate with Muslim world, that any thief, rapist, murderer, homosexual or a whore may be "exported" from Muslim country of origin into West, where asylum seeker status will be granted, psychological care provided and luxury house and car given in attempt to direct these poor souls into right way of life.
If so, then I bet that many Westerners will voluntarily elect to migrate to Iran and convert into Islam...
It is very likely that in post peak economically collapsed West laws comparable to Sharia will have to be reintroduced, albeit particular activities (say homosexuality) will not necessarily become crimes again and required standards of prove may be somewhat different.
In any case it is quite possible that Jack may be hanged if caught stealing a sheep from Jerry and incident is proven up to expected standard.
Modern civilization's values are likely to evaporate in energy declining world.