Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trader's Corner 2007

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will WTI crude be on DEC 31st 2007?

Poll ended at Thu 19 Apr 2007, 04:20:21

under $50 per barrel
5
No votes
around $55
0
0%
around $60
5
No votes
around $65
12
No votes
around $70
11
No votes
around $75
28
No votes
 
Total votes : 61

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby Doly » Tue 18 Sep 2007, 07:25:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'A')necdotal evidence of a real vacation property slowdown in Spain are starting to surface as well as this weekend's run on Northern Rock, a UK home and loan financial institution.


Mr Bill, I think the Northern Rock affair deserves much more than a little footnote. If I worked in a bank right now, I'd be panicking.

I'm sure you are going to tell me that the fundamentals of Northern Rock didn't justify a bank run, and people over-reacted. You're probably correct. But the facts are, we live in the real world, not in the world of financial experts.

Most people don't have a clue about the economy. Most people are so far from financial experts that my friends are starting to look at me as an "expert" because I appear to know the terminology. For many people in the UK, the bank run on Northern Rock is the first news they've had that something might be amiss. And, clueless as they are, their logic goes something like this: "If clueless poor little me has figured that something is wrong, something must be TERRIBLY WRONG." And they begin acting accordingly.

If this is the start of a massive crisis of confidence on banks (and by this I mean not that your average investor trusts them a little less and sells shares, but that your average clueless Joe starts thinking that keeping your money in a bank is a risk)... well, hell is breaking loose in a very BIG way. Imagine what would happen if everybody who has a pension fund that allows them to get the money out now tries to do so. Or say it's only 20% that try.

It sounds like financial armageddon to me. In fact, it sounds exactly like how peak oil was supposed to affect the economy.

Mr Bill, your comments?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Tue 18 Sep 2007, 09:09:25

Doly, the fundamentals of Northern Rock didn't justify a bank run, and people just over-reacted, as they tend to do because we live in the real world, not in the world of financial experts.

Most people don't have a clue about the economy. Most people are so far from financial experts that they rely on CNBC or CNN for their business news. For many people in the UK, the bank run on Northern Rock is the first news they've had that something might be amiss. And, clueless as they are, their logic goes something like this: "If clueless poor little me has figured that something is wrong, something must be TERRIBLY WRONG." And they begin acting accordingly.

Or something like that...

Actually, the management of Northern Rock and the BOE were pretty darned slow in telling people exactly how they were affected, about bank insurance, who was covered, up to how much and to give assurances that the BOE would act as lender of last resort. I will give you that. They were remiss for not acting more decisively, sooner, and that no doubt lead to more panic than needed to be.

However, the English are quite used to property booms and busts. They have had enough of them. And the UK has certainly enjoyed its fair share of housing inflation compared to other markets. No one was complaining when prices were rising by 25% per year. Oops, except for those poor workers that could no longer afford to get onto the property ladder.

As a matter of fact, up to now, I have given the BOE's Mervyn King full marks for not taking his eye off the ball, and focusing on inflation concerns rather than caving into financial markets to provide relief for bad borrowing/lending decisions.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ank of England Governor Mervyn King has spent the past month trying to stay above the fray as the U.S. subprime-mortgage collapse roiled credit markets. Now he's getting dragged in, whether he likes it or not.

Two days after King, 59, told lawmakers on Sept. 12 that central banks should avoid giving the impression they will help lenders that made bad decisions, the Bank of England provided emergency funds to Northern Rock Plc in the biggest bailout of a British bank in three decades.

King's credibility is in question for his refusal to emulate other central banks and take early action to help cash-strapped lenders. With Northern Rock's failure, he is finding himself subject to the same charge of excessive caution being leveled at U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, whose office adjoined King's at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the 1980s.

King held back until markets forced his hand. Last week he said that too much help ``encourages excessive risk-taking, and sows the seeds of a future financial crisis.'' With three-month money-market rates close to a nine-year high, the bank on Sept. 13 made its first additional cash loan to banks. The next day, it rescued Newcastle, England-based Northern Rock after rising credit costs left the U.K.'s third-largest mortgage provider unable to make new loans.

Northern Rock's customers have ignored assurances that their deposits are secure. While Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling said today their deposits are ``backed by the Bank of
England,
'' customers have removed at least 2 billion pounds ($4
billion) since Sept. 14., the British Broadcasting Corp. reported.

While Brown and the Bank of England have overseen Britain's
longest period of economic growth in two centuries
, consumer debt has also surged over the last decade: Households are now shouldering a record 1.3 trillion pounds in debt. In addition, the
Bank of England's benchmark rate of 5.75 percent is the highest
among the Group of Seven nations
, and London house prices fell the most in three years in September, a report from Rightmove Plc showed on Sept. 14.

King, an architect of the bank's inflation-targeting strategy, has won plaudits for helping end the U.K.'s decades-long fight with rising prices. He became chief economist in 1991 and was named governor in 2003.

Source: Bloomberg

So now King is being criticized for doing his job. Focus on the UK's domestic inflation, which was too high, and try to avoid fuelling the expectations that the BOE would drop interest rates to help out homeowners or property speculators that made poor investment decisions (or infact took equity out of their UK homes to invest in vacation properties in Spain, Portugal, France, Cyprus, etc.).

No, I am sorry, Doly, the BOE's King and the BOC's David Dodge get full marks for acting like responsible central bankers. Let the market find a solution first, like a take-over of cash strapped Northern Rock by one of its better capitalised rivals (like BoA aiding Countrywide Financial), and then step in to clean up the mess later, if it does not work out. That is far preferable to bailing out financial institutions at the drop of a hat and creating yet more moral hazards. It may look like lunacy from the outside, but markets are more robust than you give them credit for.

In the meantime, individuals clammer for more investment products, insist on self-directed retirement funds and the chance to buy ETFs on everything under the sun, so it is incumbent on them to finally learn about the risks of the products they are trading. They should know whether their money is at risk or not when they open their bank accounts.

You will be happy to know that deposit insurance in Germany is up to EUR 24 million per customer (excluding some intruments like commercial paper). Implemented after the failed German bank Bankhaus Herstatt in 1974 the Germans learned their lesson and implemented laws to protect investors and make banks pay into true (private) insurance schemes to fund these bailouts, if and when necessary, that do not rely on central bank or government emergency assistance.

The Anglo-Saxens do not always get everything right, and they're not always first either. They have a lot to learn from others, too.

UPDATE: Doly wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t sounds like financial armageddon to me. In fact, it sounds exactly like how peak oil was supposed to affect the economy.


This 'credit crunch' has to do with unpoliced easy money policies and nothing to do with 'peak oil' or even resource scarcity in general. They are not even related issues.

The Fed dropping interest rates all the way to 1% in 2004 started an economic boom as early as 2002 that, along with the BOJ's ZIRP and FX reserve build-up by Asian central banks, ignited a powerful bull cycle of growth an monetary expansion while driving down long-term interest rates and the premium for risk. It was very expansionary.

That growth lead to high commodity prices not vice versa. The low premium for risk along with strong growth lead to more risk taking and this current credit crunch.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby Doly » Tue 18 Sep 2007, 09:35:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')No, I am sorry, Doly, the BOE's King and the BOC's David Dodge get full marks for acting like responsible central bankers.


You aren't really replying to my post, Mr Bill. I didn't mention the BOE reaction at all in my post, mostly because I don't know enough yet to figure out if they did the right or wrong move.

I wasn't talking at all about the BOE, but about the average person on the street, that is not sophisticated at all in financial matters. My question is: what happens if all these people suddenly decide that the best place to have your money is under your mattress? I'm not kidding, some NR customers were saying exactly that.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Tue 18 Sep 2007, 10:22:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')No, I am sorry, Doly, the BOE's King and the BOC's David Dodge get full marks for acting like responsible central bankers.


You aren't really replying to my post, Mr Bill. I didn't mention the BOE reaction at all in my post, mostly because I don't know enough yet to figure out if they did the right or wrong move.

I wasn't talking at all about the BOE, but about the average person on the street, that is not sophisticated at all in financial matters. My question is: what happens if all these people suddenly decide that the best place to have your money is under your mattress? I'm not kidding, some NR customers were saying exactly that.


Hello Doly, sorry, I should have read your question more carefully. To be honest I do not know exactly what would happen if all bank customers decided the best place to have their money was under their mattress? Would they sleep any better or would there be a large increase in the home break-in business?

Initially, if you are talking about one bank, then that bank would have to replace relatively cheap deposits paying lower rates of interest with higher interbank borrowings or in the case of Northern Rock with borrowing directly from the BOE. That would likely make most loans unprofitable, and it would instead be cheaper, and a better business decision, to simply to sell-off their loan portfolio to one of their competitors rather than try to fund it themselves. This would make Northern Rock a take-over target or drive it into bankruptcy.

However, if you are talking about all banks losing their depositor base because all retail depositors wanted their money back then we really would be talking about systemic risks and contangion. Obviously, no bank would or could lend to another as they would need that money to cover their own deposit base. No one would be able to borrow any money either.

Any call loans or loans on demand would be called in by the affected banks. If customers could not immediately repay those loans then they would be automatically in default.

The BOE would eventually have to bail-out each bank as lender of last resort, but like in Japan it would probably arrange mergers between weaker and stronger banks, while only lending to the single merged entity instead of all banks needing a bail-out. Bank bail-outs always come with increased supervision and forced asset sales, etc. They are not a license for business as usual.

These costs eventually get pushed back onto the taxpayer of course. The BOE's ability to raise funds are, of course, limited, and they just cannot print money and put it into circulation as this is inflationary (i.e. Weimar Germany). A recession cum depression would likely be the final outcome. It is no accident that the central bank as lender of last resort came on the heals of the Great Depression in 1933 that saw many independent banks fail, and depositors lose everything post the 1929 stock market crash, due to the fiscal and monetary policy mistakes made in its wake.

That money under the mattress might be valuable or worthless after the crash, but my feeling is that central banks and governments will always try to re-inflate their way out of problems rather than let deflation set in and cause a deep recession or depression. If depositors had enough cash and a hedge against inflation then they might be okay, but if they lose their jobs and still have mortgages to service, my feeling is that not too many of those standing in line outside Northern Rock even know if they are insured much less have such a sophisticated exit strategy from the global economy.

There has been a lot of virtual ink spilled on peak oil dot com about such an eventuality. I see it as very unlikely. So unlikely that I would prefer to seriously think about events that have a 20-80% of probability. But there are lot's of books written about surviving such a crash. You're much better reading those than relying on my answers on such matters here. That's all crystal ball stuff.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby IslandCrow » Tue 18 Sep 2007, 12:34:01

This Northern Rock saga is teaching me things about the British banking system. I had no idea of the levels of insurance. Doly you may want to use the following details from the BBC to further impress your friends.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Financial Services Compensation Scheme that covers banks.....It protects 100% of the first £2,000 in any bank account and 90% of the next £33,000 - giving a maximum payout of £31,700 if a bank did go bust.
We should teach our children the 4-Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rejoice.
User avatar
IslandCrow
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby gswarriors4life » Tue 18 Sep 2007, 17:56:23

I guess Ben Bernanke has really lived up to his nickname 'Helicopter Ben'... So what happens from here now that the Fed cut the interest rate by 50 basis points? I really hope that Stagflation isn't gonna happen.
User avatar
gswarriors4life
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:17:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gswarriors4life', 'I') guess Ben Bernanke has really lived up to his nickname 'Helicopter Ben'... So what happens from here now that the Fed cut the interest rate by 50 basis points? I really hope that Stagflation isn't gonna happen.


For me personally, not my firm or for my job, but for my own investments this is the worst possible outcome. Everything I sold (or did not buy) is up a minimum 10% now (3% yesterday). The S&P Energy Index up 18.5% since its low at 485 where I last bought in August. But having sold too early I cannot re-enter at these levels. There is a lot to be said for a balanced portfolio approach versus trying to second guess the market.

Helicopter Ben, and yes now he really has earned his nickname, has plumped for inflation over a market correction. This gives the green light for higher inflation to come (forget moderating now); a weaker US dollar; faster global growth (pumped up by cheap funding out of the USA, and let's not forget that neither the ECB or the BOJ increased rates either); and therefore higher commodity, base metal and energy prices stemming from that growth.

That was the base case scenario, but only after a healthy correction to the wider market. Now the central banks have conspired to ensure that does not happen (or at least they hope so). Being caught flat footed here I do not know in which direction to jump? Buy into a Bull Trap near previous highs or sit tight and risk falling even further behind? Everything I would now look to buy is already too expensive. This is not a good place to be!

And to think that Greenspan has the nerve to go on 60 Minutes to plug his memoirs saying that inflation is his biggest concern, and that he thinks interest rates will have to eventually have to climb to 10% to battle global inflation. What a two faced prick! The Greenspan Put is dead, long live the Bernanke Put!

Once again savers and bond holders will be royally screwed over, offered on the alter of vested interests and the gods of perpetual growth. But now that I have had my rant I need to do some soul searching and try to figure out what to do next?

Getting the wind knocked out of me by a kick in the stomach yesterday in soccer is actually a good feeling to how I feel in the wake of yesterday's 50 basis point Fed cuts. I have regained my breath and there are no side effects. On the otherhand, my head is still reeling and I feel sick to my stomach thinking about stagflation and opportunities lost! : - (

UPDATE: on Helicopter Ben
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')all Street raised a 300-point cheer to Ben Bernanke after he unexpectedly slashed US interest rates by half a percentage point rather than the quarter-point cut most investors expected. History will not treat the "Bernanke put" so kindly.

Alan Greenspan, the Fed chairman's celebrated predecessor, spent 20 years putting off the day of reckoning by cutting the cost of money at the first whiff of trouble.

That increasingly discredited policy simply shifted America's bubbles from one part of the economy to another and will increase the size of the bill when it eventually comes to be paid.

advertisementBernanke had the opportunity to signal a break with the past and he fluffed it. Fears that "Helicopter Ben" is just a chip off the old block look spot on.

There are two possible readings of the Fed's decision. Either there's something nasty in the woodwork that we haven't fully understood or Wall Street's cheap money addicts have simply been handed one more fix for their catastrophic habit.

The statement accompanying the first cut in four years underscored the confusion at the heart of the US's politically-driven monetary policy. The FOMC noted that inflation risks remain – and we'll know more clearly today how serious the threat from rising prices is – but in a pre-election year no one is prepared for the tough love required. This was Ben's first big test. He's blown it.

Source: History won't treat 'Bernanke put' kindly
Last edited by MrBill on Wed 19 Sep 2007, 08:26:15, edited 1 time in total.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby mkwin » Wed 19 Sep 2007, 05:27:40

Well I bought oil and mining stocks in the august dip so I have. made some good ground.

My next move is to go long on the oil price once OPEC decides to increase production in a few weeks, they have recently stated they will increase production further if oil stays above $80 dollars for 15 days (hopefully this will cause a temporary weakness in the oil price that will allow me to buy at a good level). I plan on buying up to ten contracts and putting in relatively high sell triggers. So, if oil does spike to $100 or higher next year I will make a lot of money, if it doesn't I'll lose a reasonable chunck of money but I think the gamble is worth it.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby Doly » Wed 19 Sep 2007, 07:16:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')Helicopter Ben, and yes now he really has earned his nickname, has plumped for inflation over a market correction.


I've been wondering about his move. My thoughts are:

1) Ben does know his job. He proved it with that move of reducing the discount rate. He knows the tools in his toolbox.
2) Ben has access to all that information suggesting recession that we all have.
3) Ben has possibly access to other information we don't have.

My suspicion: he has done this move not thinking about the situation with the markets and the banks, but thinking about the longer run (as he's supposed to do, anyway). He knows that something quite nasty is coming and he has to take some radical action. The fact that everybody is thinking about other stuff is great for him, because in other circumstances people would assume from his move that he sees a nasty recession in the horizon and take defensive positions that could precipitate the very thing he's trying to avert. Instead, people are having a party and thinking he may be a bit of a fool, but isn't that great for us investors? And that suits him fine.

As for the likelihood of the "money under the mattress" scenario: you know as well as I do that you only need a relatively small percentage of people doing that (say 5%) to have a pretty big crisis in your hands. I'm not saying I expect anything like that in the imminent future, I'm pointing out it's in the realms of possibility within the next couple of years, if there are a couple more banks crashing spectacularly. (Which, I hope you agree, is possible). From the point of view of Joe Public, one is bad luck, two could be a coincidence, but three proves beyond any doubt that all banks are suspect.

I think everybody is used to the idea that the only players in the financial game are investors. That's just not true. Everybody is a player, it's just that the average person is always playing in the same way, so forecasts don't really take them into account. When the average person starts changing their game, look out. There's a lot of them.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby topcat » Wed 19 Sep 2007, 07:54:11

After hearing about BB's 50bp cut, these two quotes came to mind:

"Are you out of your Vulcan mind?" (Dr. McCoy) and,

"We're all freaking doomed!!!!!" (The Mogambo Guru).


Mr. B: You had asked about mining stocks,

GG: large proven producer, actually pays a small dividend (own)
SLW: straight silver play (own)
MNG: on the verge of making a world-class mine in Alaska (own)
MYNG: swing for the fences, Holy Mary pass. If/when they get their test mill operational, and prove their reserves (own)
HL: mostly silver, some gold, old stand-by (sold)
RGLD: makes good money from royalties (sold)
UXG: run by ex-founder of Goldcorp, has a nose for gold (watching)
EGO: keeps going up, need to do homework (watching)
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby mkwin » Wed 19 Sep 2007, 08:16:01

Do you know any good uranium producers Topcat?
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby topcat » Wed 19 Sep 2007, 08:29:17

mkwin: Do not follow uranium miners much at all. Ony two on my radar are:

CCJ: large producer, hit hard when their developing mine (Cigar Lake) sprung a big leak, and

NAK: Peter Grandich likes them A LOT, have not done any homework on them, their charts look like we may be at a good enrty point BUT, who knows.
User avatar
topcat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed 01 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Northern US

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 19 Sep 2007, 08:59:58

Doly wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'ve been wondering about his move. My thoughts are:

1) Ben does know his job. He proved it with that move of reducing the discount rate. He knows the tools in his toolbox.
2) Ben has access to all that information suggesting recession that we all have.
3) Ben has possibly access to other information we don't have.


Doly, you may be right, BUT....

Greenspan has just come out with a flattering memoire of himself defending his many mistakes as being the lesser evil at the time. All mistakes that have lead us to this current credit crunch. All mistakes that could have been avoided through prudence. That is the problem when 'A Central Banker' tries to out guess the entire market. I do not care how smart they are, or think they are, they do not know everything!*

If you mean, Ben is doing this right now to try to avoid a US recession, then yes I agree with you. He is trying to avoid a recesssion.

Unfortunately, as Greenspan also points out, inflation is the real threat and the one that central banks should be addressing. Not keeping the wheels on this expansionary wagon turning over regardless of the long-term consequences.

Japan proved that markets and not central bankers or finance ministers are the masters of the universe. This is just another nail in the coffin for financial discipline by the US authorities, who have control over anything that even remotely touches US shores, but do not know how to regulate, much less control, global financial markets. Unfortunately for us all, they do, however, still possess the power to ruin markets** for us all.

I am not even talking about global financial unbalances that need to be addressed or the US' own unfunded future liabilities and accumlated debts and deficits.

Until then, enjoy the party!

*There are close to 500.000 financial services employees in Manhattan. Another 350.000 in The City of London. Paris slightly fewer, but close. Chicago has 300.000. Tokyo another 250.000. Then follows Shanghai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Frankfurt, Zurich, Geneva and Dubai. Those are just the major centers and does not even include fund managers in and around Boston or Zug, Switzerland, or niche markets like Dublin or Lichtenstein amoung others. Millions of finance specialists that dissect individual products and markets everyday for a living. When a central banker second guesses them he should be asking himself, "what do I know that they do not know?" and not vice versa.

**free, open, transparent and left to their own devices
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby rostov » Wed 19 Sep 2007, 17:00:06

MrBill,

If you are looking for Uranium, as per pm, I'd like to send you some information.

I worry that your request for quick advice to the mining situation may be drowned in current discussions concerning the market and economies right now.

I know of 2 other miners who are listed globally, and yet have their hands in 2 different parts of Africa that are producing Uranium. I have had the latter appear quite a bit (no homework done yet), but the former has had some limelight recently.

The first is Paladin Resources. Listed in TSX and ASX. Touted as one of the other major med/high cap companies who have started producing uranium (albeit with tething problems for the past 7 months), and touted by most traders as one of the very few news miners which *actually* produce Uranium, after 20+ years of no other new miners actually producing. Their Queenland (Australia) operations can not start until that state's anti-nuke policy actually takes off (Fed policy is all go, but individual states have own say), and the interesting thing is investors are watching how the recent Queensland recent premier sudden departure and subsequent replacement will affect the current state's stand on nuclear power.

The 2nd is Areva. 1 stop shop for mining, distillates ... right up to contractor for building nukes across the world. Current mining operations in the Niger part of Africa. I think they list on TSX (don't know the rest e.g. NYSE, etc) but definitely not on ASX so I didn't keep tabs.

Note that their political standings in Africa is pretty tricky. Paladin and supporting government is currently accused by the opposition that they cut the govt in for their operations, and Areva is accused of supporting the rebels and thus lost monopoly over uranium rights in Niger.

No attempted intrinsic values worked on either, neither have I worked out maximum price I'd pay for a 15% RR on 10 year hold. Paladin's past track record will kill this conventional model evaluation, and Areva is just plain out of my sight for now.

Too much UxC-related information on the U situation, either spot, futures, and global situation concerning now till 2017. For now, [opinion] the demand/supply situation looks like it's bottoming out, and can provide soon (2-4 weeks?) enough indication of where it's going (will the world really move forward as per what U will provide?)

PM me anytime.
regards,
Rostov
"Some {} are more equal than others"
User avatar
rostov
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Sat 29 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 20 Sep 2007, 03:37:28

Thanks Rostov. The whole mining sector is so daunting because each individual mine is so different. I am no where near pulling the trigger on this fund, but just fact finding at the moment. Let's see how serious the core investors are first before I invest too much effort.

RE Areva. Is this not quasi French government? I think it is the firm that co-partnered with Siemens and then bought them out, but I see from their website that Siemens still has a small holding in at least one part of Areva.

To be honest, last I checked this company had a free float of just 5%. All the rest belonged to the government, management, Siemens and the employees pension fund if memory serves me correct?

There is no way I want any part of a French company majority owned or controlled by the government. It will always be run for the benefit of the government, management and its unions, and not as a for profit company for its (minority) shareholders.

I cannot even find their income statement and balance sheet on Bloomberg, just a summary on their homepage. From what I see it trades at a P/E of 33 and net income fell 38% in 2006, so it is not cheap, although shares have risen 40% YOY.

It looks like there are 35 million outstanding shares, but it does not breakdown block ownership, and only 1.4 million voting shares? Do these prefered shares held by insiders control the rest of the common shares?

Not enough information, but it looks like it wants to grow through aquistion. That is a typical French business model. Protect your own backyard, expand into others, but keep the company close to the state to create national champions.

In any case thanks for the heads up and I will definitely PM you if and when this mining fund gets any further. As I said, it is all a little daunting to evaluate each and every company on its own merits and to ascertain whether its public statements accurately reflect the quality of their assets on or under the ground as the case may be. At least the largest diversified mining groups have geographical reach to hedge their country risks and a track record of profitability. Less can be said for the small and medium sized miners.

Cheers.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 20 Sep 2007, 05:02:25

Doly wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
I've been wondering about his move. My thoughts are:

1) Ben does know his job. He proved it with that move of reducing the discount rate. He knows the tools in his toolbox.
2) Ben has access to all that information suggesting recession that we all have.
3) Ben has possibly access to other information we don't have.


This comment from Standard Bank follow somewhat along the lines of your own thoughts, Doly. And you're right, obviously the Fed is worried about a recession in the real economy, otherwise they would not have cut by a full 50 basis points at this time. However, it is mana from Heaven for the banks and speculators none the less.

I will post this in full as there is no linik. Thanks.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')We are gratified that global equities markets have responded so favourably to the FOMC’s 50 basis point fed funds rate cut. With regard to both valuation and longer term earnings effects, the market reaction is warranted, of course, at least in terms of direction, if not magnitude. But given our reading of the Fed’s move, we cannot quite share the markets’ enthusiasm.

This is a Fed that bases policy on economic, not market need. (Such was reiterated in yesterday’s FOMC statement.) Although formally quite separate from the US Commerce and Labor Departments, which provide most US data, the Federal Reserve system has vast resources with which to assess the current state of the economy. In other words, they know more than we do, so their choice of the bolder 50 bp cut, though not unexpected, was also not reassuring. No one doubted that the Fed would eventually respond to the threat of a recession; the questions were only about the magnitude of the threat and the timing of the Fed’s reaction. To Standard, the magnitude of yesterday’s cut suggests, in retrospect, that the Fed should have acted sooner, although we admit that it did not have the ‘cover’ to do so in the form non-housing indicators with a decidedly recessionary tone.

We did not have to wait long for a confirmation of the bad news implicit in the Fed’s action: housing starts and permits, which began slumping in February 2006, continued their sharp decline in August with no reversal in sight. Monetary policy takes many months to achieve the desired effect on domestic demand. Standard is therefore braced for more unpleasant economic news in the weeks and months ahead. This implies more ease and should ensure that UST yields will remain low, at least in the short end where inflation anxiety, a function of Fed ease, should not be relevant.

As we write, EUR, at 1.397, is immaterially weaker than our yearend forecast of 1.40 (not yet breached), which looked to some unduly pessimistic (for the dollar) when we made it several months ago. EUR appears to be moving on actual and projected interest rate differentials. (The ECB may not raise rates, but seems unlikely to cut them). One reason EUR has not approached 1.40 sooner resides in the consistent willingness of foreign investors, official and private, to accumulate dollar-denominated assets. When we reported on the June Treasury International capital report and on the Q2 capital account more generally, we detected no meaningful change in the willingness of these entities to hold, indeed even keep buying (on a net basis) these assets.

The July report, released yesterday, undermines, though perhaps not definitively, that scenario of complacency. Both official and private foreign investors were net sellers of US Treasury bonds and notes (by $9.3bn). Because they bought other US long-term securities, including US government agency bonds, their holdings of long-term paper did increase slightly – by $24.7bn – in the month. But this contrasts dramatically with the average $124.6bn monthly accumulation in Q2. Moreover, when all other cross-border flows in long-term securities are included, including net US purchases of foreign paper, there was a net outflow of $3.0bn, against an average monthly inflow of $85.5bn in Q2.

This did not translate into an overall capital outflow in securities in August (foreign direct investment flows are not included in the TIC report), because funds were shifted into short-term instruments like US Treasury bills and bank deposits. From there, however, they could well exert additional downward pressure on the dollar (if not reversed, which remains possible, as one month does not make a trend in these volatile series).

Source: ResearchStrategy@Standardbank.com
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby Doly » Thu 20 Sep 2007, 07:06:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')This comment from Standard Bank follow somewhat along the lines of your own thoughts, Doly. And you're right, obviously the Fed is worried about a recession in the real economy, otherwise they would not have cut by a full 50 basis points at this time.


Thanks for the compliment. I have a question for you, Mr Bill: Is there a word to describe the following situation:

a) Recession
b) Inflation (not necessarily very high, but definitely not deflation)
c) Widespread debt at the individual level

In short, a situation were a significant number of people don't have the income to repay their debts, even the minimum payments, because their salaries aren't increasing in pace with the cost of living, and unemployment is on the rise. A very high number of people have to declare themselves insolvent.

I think that's where the US is heading and Europe will follow shortly. We already have (c) and some (b), and (a) is coming soon.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 20 Sep 2007, 08:51:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')This comment from Standard Bank follow somewhat along the lines of your own thoughts, Doly. And you're right, obviously the Fed is worried about a recession in the real economy, otherwise they would not have cut by a full 50 basis points at this time.


Thanks for the compliment. I have a question for you, Mr Bill: Is there a word to describe the following situation:

a) Recession
b) Inflation (not necessarily very high, but definitely not deflation)
c) Widespread debt at the individual level

In short, a situation were a significant number of people don't have the income to repay their debts, even the minimum payments, because their salaries aren't increasing in pace with the cost of living, and unemployment is on the rise. A very high number of people have to declare themselves insolvent.

I think that's where the US is heading and Europe will follow shortly. We already have (c) and some (b), and (a) is coming soon.


Yes, the first two together spell 'stagflation', while the third term describes the severity and the length of time it takes to crawl your way out of this particular Hell.

In the case of Japan 15-years of low, slow, no growth. And they were running a trade surplus the entire time and had a current account surplus despite very high government spending to stimulate the domestic economy that has left it with crippling debts. Not to mention that it was America at the time that soaked up much of Japan's exports. Who will be buying America's exports as the US tries to right its economy and work off its excesses?

This is just 'one' side effect of Mr. Bernanke's put. Read it and weep.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
Fears of dollar collapse as Saudis take fright

Saudi Arabia has refused to cut interest rates in lockstep with the US Federal Reserve for the first time, signalling that the oil-rich Gulf kingdom is preparing to break the dollar currency peg in a move that risks setting off a stampede out of the dollar across the Middle East.

Ben Bernanke has placed the dollar in a dangerous situation, say analysts

"This is a very dangerous situation for the dollar," said Hans Redeker, currency chief at BNP Paribas.

"Saudi Arabia has $800bn (£400bn) in their future generation fund, and the entire region has $3,500bn under management. They face an inflationary threat and do not want to import an interest rate policy set for the recessionary conditions in the United States," he said.

The Saudi central bank said today that it would take "appropriate measures" to halt huge capital inflows into the country, but analysts say this policy is unsustainable and will inevitably lead to the collapse of the dollar peg.

As a close ally of the US, Riyadh has so far tried to stick to the peg, but the link is now destabilising its own economy.

advertisementThe Fed's dramatic half point cut to 4.75pc yesterday has already caused a plunge in the world dollar index to a fifteen year low, touching with weakest level ever against the mighty euro at just under $1.40.

There is now a growing danger that global investors will start to shun the US bond markets. The latest US government data on foreign holdings released this week show a collapse in purchases of US bonds from $97bn to just $19bn in July, with outright net sales of US Treasuries.

The danger is that this could now accelerate as the yield gap between the United States and the rest of the world narrows rapidly, leaving America starved of foreign capital flows needed to cover its current account deficit - expected to reach $850bn this year, or 6.5pc of GDP.

Mr Redeker said foreign investors have been gradually pulling out of the long-term US debt markets, leaving the dollar dependent on short-term funding. Foreigners have funded 25pc to 30pc of America's credit and short-term paper markets over the last two years.

"They were willing to provide the money when rates were paying nicely, but why bear the risk in these dramatically changed circumstances? We think that a fall in dollar to $1.50 against the euro is not out of the question at all by the first quarter of 2008," he said.

"This is nothing like the situation in 1998 when the crisis was in Asia, but the US was booming. This time the US itself is the problem," he said.

Mr Redeker said the biggest danger for the dollar is that falling US rates will at some point trigger a reversal yen "carry trade", causing massive flows from the US back to Japan.

Jim Rogers, the commodity king and former partner of George Soros, said the Federal Reserve was playing with fire by cutting rates so aggressively at a time when the dollar was already under pressure.

The risk is that flight from US bonds could push up the long-term yields that form the base price of credit for most mortgages, the driving the property market into even deeper crisis.

"If Ben Bernanke starts running those printing presses even faster than he's already doing, we are going to have a serious recession. The dollar's going to collapse, the bond market's going to collapse. There's going to be a lot of problems," he said.

The Federal Reserve, however, clearly calculates the risk of a sudden downturn is now so great that the it outweighs dangers of a dollar slide.

Former Fed chief Alan Greenspan said this week that house prices may fall by "double digits" as the subprime crisis bites harder, prompting households to cut back sharply on spending.

For Saudi Arabia, the dollar peg has clearly become a liability. Inflation has risen to 4pc and the M3 broad money supply is surging at 22pc.

The pressures are even worse in other parts of the Gulf. The United Arab Emirates now faces inflation of 9.3pc, a 20-year high. In Qatar it has reached 13pc.

Kuwait became the first of the oil sheikhdoms to break its dollar peg in May, a move that has begun to rein in rampant money supply growth.

source: Fears of dollar collapse as Saudis take fright

And read this article as well.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Chinese government has begun a concerted campaign of economic threats against the United States, hinting that it may liquidate its vast holding of US treasuries if Washington imposes trade sanctions to force a yuan revaluation.

Source: China threatens 'nuclear option' of dollar sales

America wanted to 'share' its pain with its creditors, and now it looks like everyone is moving quickly and quietly to the exits, so that 'they' are not left holding the bag.

This, as they say, 'is a defining moment in history', so you may want to make careful notes to tell your grandchildren about 2007. Too bad 07/07/07 is already behind us because that has an even better ring to it than 9/11, and I doubt 08/08/08 will look much like today's landscape, although parts of Asia's expansion may indeed last until the Beijing Olympics are out of the way late next summer.

UPDATE: I have said this before. It is worth repeating again and again until people understand the secret behind the euro and perhaps the source of its weakness as well.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')rance, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Greece, and latterly Ireland are all facing very serious trouble. They are at or near the top of the cycle. Housing bubbles caused by ultra-low interest rates (geared for Germany, when Germany was down -- the dirty secret of EMU) are starting to burst. Club Med's share of global exports is collapsing.

Bernard Connolly, global strategist at Banque AIG and former head of economic research at the European Commission (the best informed euro-critic in the City, and the one most feared by Brussels), says Spain will face an outright "depression" by 2008-2009 and Italy will face an "Argentine crucifiction" until it is ejected, or chooses to escape, from the euro-zone.

How has this "divergence" happened? In a nutshell, Germany has gained 20pc in unit labour cost competitiveness against France, 30pc against Spain, and 40pc against Italy since the currencies were locked together in 1995 (EU data). It has done so by screwing down wages, while Club Med has done what it always does -- let rip on wages.
Source: Dollar to collapse?

p.s. the author has it wrong when he states, "Housing bubbles caused by ultra-low interest rates (geared for Germany, when Germany was down -- the dirty secret of EMU) are starting to burst."

As we all know that interest rates were far too high for Germany that went through 10-years of low, slow, no growth, while supporting Eastern Germany and making over-sized payments into the EU budget, while comparatively low interest rates were stimulating very fast growth in places like Spain and Ireland. Unfortunately, countries like Spain, France and Italy did not use this grace period to make structural changes to their economies being the grasshoppers that they are.

I know it is popular in London to make fun of the Germans, but lets get the facts straight shall we? Otherwise it's not cricket is it?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby firestarter » Thu 20 Sep 2007, 09:57:54

Mr Bill,

Do you see a dollar depreciation inflection point whereby other CB's will act (cut)?

Also, it looks as if subsequent to BB's cut on Tuesday, real interest rates are up big. As of now the 10 yr note is yielding 4.6%, which is almost 15bp's above its Tuesday am yield.
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MOCKBA » Thu 20 Sep 2007, 10:25:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'R')E Areva. Is this not quasi French government?

It is indeed. French government holds controlling interest since AREVA is the supplier of the fuel to generate most of the French electricity not to mention French bomb.

It is bizarre but starting this week AREVA is running weird ad on CNN US - my only explanation is that they are building the brand in anticipation of US market reopening to nuclear (they are (with partners) building enrichment plant in US that would take about 40% of the US enrichment market)

The only non government entity on Earth that mines uranium in great quantities is Cameco, but that could change quite fast since they are Canadian and 60+% of Ontario (100% of Canada's nuclear) electricity comes from their fuel, thus I like DNN more - they are different type of monopoly.
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

cron