Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Can wishful thinking replace oil?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby TonyPrep » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 03:57:42

As a long time (well, a couple of years) observer of the peak oil discussions, I've noticed an increasing amount of wishful thinking amongst even those who discuss the subject. It seems to take the form of some calculation of the amount of uranium in the crust and/or the amount of sunlight hitting the earth. From this calculation, they can see that we can grow energy use far into the future and, therefore, there is a "solution", though we may find some hardships as we transition. Such arguments appear to require a good dose of belief and don't really address the use of finite resources to harness the energy or the likelihood of being able to harness the energy at the required rates to satisfy growing demand, and without side-effects. Neither do they address the more general issue of finite resources or the other problems that growth brings.

Can we really power ahead on wishful thinking?
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby SILENTTODD » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 05:45:18

In a word? NO!
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby ekaggata » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 07:22:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'A')s a long time (well, a couple of years) observer of the peak oil discussions, I've noticed an increasing amount of wishful thinking amongst even those who discuss the subject. It seems to take the form of some calculation of the amount of uranium in the crust and/or the amount of sunlight hitting the earth. From this calculation, they can see that we can grow energy use far into the future and, therefore, there is a "solution", though we may find some hardships as we transition. Such arguments appear to require a good dose of belief -
<snip>


I fail to understand in what way quantitative and factual arguments based on real physics (sunlight intensity, Uranium concentrations) are considered "belief" whereas pure rhetoric or arguments based on authority are judged to be realistic?

It's a given that the arguments are immensely complex after you look at the numbers - but if you don't start with that, the arguments are baseless. After all, this website wouldn't even exist unless someone like Hubbert had done the calculations on oil discovery and production. It is exactly the general population's (including politicians') inability to accept Hubbert's quantitative arguments because they didn't "feel" right that got us into this mess.

So afaics your position is exactly opposite to the correct one.
ekaggata
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed 12 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby Olorin » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 09:33:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'A')s a long time (well, a couple of years) observer of the peak oil discussions, I've noticed an increasing amount of wishful thinking amongst even those who discuss the subject. It seems to take the form of some calculation of the amount of uranium in the crust and/or the amount of sunlight hitting the earth. From this calculation, they can see that we can grow energy use far into the future and, therefore, there is a "solution", though we may find some hardships as we transition. Such arguments appear to require a good dose of belief and don't really address the use of finite resources to harness the energy or the likelihood of being able to harness the energy at the required rates to satisfy growing demand, and without side-effects. Neither do they address the more general issue of finite resources or the other problems that growth brings.

Can we really power ahead on wishful thinking?


Could it be that the wishful thinking is on your side? I get the impression you don´t even want to think about ways to mitigate the situation. That´s O.K. with me and a way to go but it´s not mine. Have you ever been to war?

There are ways to improve our situation.

I base my ideas on facts and numbers. Having read a book with over 140 footnotes/internet links and page-long calculations from an expert engineer without any financial interests I don´t think this is wishful thinking.

And I never said that we could go on growing forever. Quite the contrary. But only because there are limits to growth doesn´t mean we shouldn´t be doing something about our current problems.

I may be wrong but then again you also may be. Does anybody on earth have the ultimate truth? Have there never been times when you learned something which turned your view of the world upside down?
But if you are not willing to reconsider your beliefs then forget my posts. And spare me your dumb arrogance.
User avatar
Olorin
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby Ferretlover » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 10:22:09

"Have there never been times when you learned something which turned your view of the world upside down?"

Yes. The decline of oil supply.

Can wishful thinking replace oil. Of course not.
Can thinking about further development of alternative energies prove beneficial? Yes. I am in favor of thinking.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby Ludi » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 11:17:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ferretlover', 'C')an thinking about further development of alternative energies prove beneficial? Yes. I am in favor of thinking.


Personally, I find thinking beneficial, but I find doing even more beneficial. I'm in favor of not just thinking, but taking action. We need to move beyond the thinking stage to the applying stage. I'm more interested in what people are doing with the information they've gotten from this board, than merely what they're thinking.


Wishful thinking, without action, doesn't do squat.


What are you all doing?
Ludi
 

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby TonyPrep » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 16:14:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ekaggata', 'I') fail to understand in what way quantitative and factual arguments based on real physics (sunlight intensity, Uranium concentrations) are considered "belief" whereas pure rhetoric or arguments based on authority are judged to be realistic?
The belief is that the energy sources can be harnessed without any bad side effects and at the levels required to maintain growth indefinitely. Whilst I accept that it may be possible, I've yet to read a rational argument that shows that it is possible. That's where the belief comes in, not that there may be enough uranium theoretically, or that there is enough raw solar energy. The belief also covers the lack of any bad side-effects to growth itself.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby TonyPrep » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 16:25:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Olorin', 'C')ould it be that the wishful thinking is on your side? I get the impression you don´t even want to think about ways to mitigate the situation. That´s O.K. with me and a way to go but it´s not mine. Have you ever been to war?
Then you get the wrong impression. We live on a finite planet and so sustainability requires, at some point, zero growth. It is impossible to be sustainable by using resources beyond their renewal rate. Growth requires increasing use of resources. Some of those are already used beyond their renewal rate and others with join that group unless growth is halted. The mitigation action I'd like to see is a move toward truly sustainable societies. Do you believe that growth can continue indefinitely?$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Olorin', 'I') base my ideas on facts and numbers. Having read a book with over 140 footnotes/internet links and page-long calculations from an expert engineer without any financial interests I don´t think this is wishful thinking.
I have not read any of your previous posts so I don't know what you are proposing. $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Olorin', 'A')nd I never said that we could go on growing forever. Quite the contrary. But only because there are limits to growth doesn´t mean we shouldn´t be doing something about our current problems.
I agree. We should be trying to move to a sustainable society.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Olorin', 'B')ut if you are not willing to reconsider your beliefs then forget my posts. And spare me your dumb arrogance.
Thanks for that. I don't want us to base any future on beliefs. Richard Heinberg distilled some axioms of sustainability; we should try to incorporate something like them into how our societies operate. If we don't then we condemn our societies to collapse. I think a smoother transition would be better. Don't you?
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby JPL » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 16:45:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')Personally, I find thinking beneficial, but I find doing even more beneficial. I'm in favor of not just thinking, but taking action. We need to move beyond the thinking stage to the applying stage. I'm more interested in what people are doing with the information they've gotten from this board, than merely what they're thinking.


Wishful thinking, without action, doesn't do squat.


What are you all doing?


Hi Ludi,

Weelll... apart from NOT posting any more on PO.com (grin) - pictures sometimes speak louder than words. So I just grabbed the digi-cam and just put together some random images of the chaotic, trying-to-rebuild-everything-at-once, post-peak lifestyle at chez JP...

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

(Sorry no gardening stuff today 'cos it's been very wet and everything is emberassingly over-grown)

JP
JPL
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Off with the Fey Folk
Top

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby americandream » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 18:51:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ekaggata', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', 'A')s a long time (well, a couple of years) observer of the peak oil discussions, I've noticed an increasing amount of wishful thinking amongst even those who discuss the subject. It seems to take the form of some calculation of the amount of uranium in the crust and/or the amount of sunlight hitting the earth. From this calculation, they can see that we can grow energy use far into the future and, therefore, there is a "solution", though we may find some hardships as we transition. Such arguments appear to require a good dose of belief -
<snip>


I fail to understand in what way quantitative and factual arguments based on real physics (sunlight intensity, Uranium concentrations) are considered "belief" whereas pure rhetoric or arguments based on authority are judged to be realistic?

It's a given that the arguments are immensely complex after you look at the numbers - but if you don't start with that, the arguments are baseless. After all, this website wouldn't even exist unless someone like Hubbert had done the calculations on oil discovery and production. It is exactly the general population's (including politicians') inability to accept Hubbert's quantitative arguments because they didn't "feel" right that got us into this mess.

So afaics your position is exactly opposite to the correct one.


This guys way ahead of you ekkagata in terms of what he's contemplating. He's not simply considering mobility resourcing...he's talking about resourcing the capitalist systems complete and exponentially growing usage...mobility, infrastructure...the whole works.

And the argument is a simple one....can the endless needs of capitalist inspired consumption be met by this planet's resources as we move into a phase where the system has moved well beyond the limited borders of the West into the Third World and the former communist states....the entire planet in other words.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby ekaggata » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 20:14:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '
')
This guys way ahead of you ekkagata in terms of what he's contemplating. He's not simply considering mobility resourcing...he's talking about resourcing the capitalist systems complete and exponentially growing usage...mobility, infrastructure...the whole works.

A completely unjustified assumption - assuming that I have not considered any of that.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')And the argument is a simple one....can the endless needs of capitalist inspired consumption be met by this planet's resources as we move into a phase where the system has moved well beyond the limited borders of the West into the Third World and the former communist states....the entire planet in other words.

There is nothing simple about this argument, however simple it may look on the surface. It starts with quantitative analysis and a very careful review of one's "a prioris". And then lots, lots more quantitative analysis based on scientific principles.

Unfortunately, for most people it starts and ends with baseless assertions and hearsay mixed with emotion and appeals to authority.
ekaggata
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed 12 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby Bas » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 20:27:08

Humans are only capable of contemplating a handful of variables at the same time. When confronted with an overwhelming number of variables that, for instance, exist in any given society and try to calculate a future from that our minds get stuck and cannot but give up the attempt/conclude the whole world will crash as our brain crashes trying to understand it all; it's a powerful cause of doomerist thinking; and eventhough you can understand what I just wrote, the same trap still gets me on a regular basis and I'm sure will everybody else here.

(not to say there aren't plenty of 'legitimate' reasons to be pessimistic)
Bas
 

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby americandream » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 21:13:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ekaggata', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '
')
This guys way ahead of you ekkagata in terms of what he's contemplating. He's not simply considering mobility resourcing...he's talking about resourcing the capitalist systems complete and exponentially growing usage...mobility, infrastructure...the whole works.

A completely unjustified assumption - assuming that I have not considered any of that.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')And the argument is a simple one....can the endless needs of capitalist inspired consumption be met by this planet's resources as we move into a phase where the system has moved well beyond the limited borders of the West into the Third World and the former communist states....the entire planet in other words.

There is nothing simple about this argument, however simple it may look on the surface. It starts with quantitative analysis and a very careful review of one's "a prioris". And then lots, lots more quantitative analysis based on scientific principles.

Unfortunately, for most people it starts and ends with baseless assertions and hearsay mixed with emotion and appeals to authority.


Listen mate...cut the waffle...can it or can't it..simple analogy...how long would a bunch of dumbassed gluttons make your average planetary larder last?

If you can show me technology for spinning out oil, copper, blah, blah, blah into the next century, I'm likely to change my mind. Junkets and white papers...nah....just stalling for time.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby Ludi » Mon 03 Sep 2007, 21:34:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'h')oly shit JPL that is cool!


Yeah, how many of us get to live in a 400 year old farmhouse? :)


(or want to, actually :razz: )
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby JPL » Tue 04 Sep 2007, 13:08:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'h')oly shit JPL that is cool!


Yeah, how many of us get to live in a 400 year old farmhouse? :)


(or want to, actually :razz: )


Laboris Gloria Ludi...

(grin)

JP
JPL
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Off with the Fey Folk
Top

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby JPL » Tue 04 Sep 2007, 17:19:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'h')oly shit JPL that is cool!


Yeah, how many of us get to live in a 400 year old farmhouse? :)


(or want to, actually :razz: )


Sorry, maybe some misunderstanding here, point I'm trying to make is what can be done if you make efforts. I am not a man of great means & I'm not trying to show anything off. This is what the place looked like when we arrived a few years ago - an old & failed farm bought in a fire-sale:

Image

Image

Nearly all of the work to-date has been done by my wife & I, by hand, learning from the book. A lot of it since I started posting here, for point of interest.

Also the 350 (grin) year-old farmhouse is something that suits my personal taste in terms of 'era-I-would-like-to-regress-back-to' post-oil lifestyle. They really BUILT 'em back then. Now the restoration is nearing completion I can confidently say that the building is more energy-efficient (by design!) than 99% of 'modern' crap. Also much less 'embodied energy' due to use of traditional materials.


So :razz: :razz: :razz: back (grin)

JP
JPL
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Off with the Fey Folk
Top

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby TonyPrep » Tue 04 Sep 2007, 18:55:54

I'm not sure how the discussion turned the way it did. My post was about an observation that even those who appear to understand peak oil still look for a "solution" that allows business as usual, even if there is some pain in adjusting to new energy sources and new resources, generally. Some genuinely appear to believe in such a solution but without being able fully rationalise that belief. Maybe it's what Richard Heinberg calls the cultural trance of denial in which we are all embedded.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

Re: Can wishful thinking replace oil?

Postby Ludi » Tue 04 Sep 2007, 18:59:38

No, it really is amazing, JP. I was just poking at you. :)


We all can certainly do something with whatever we start with, and if that's "nothing" then maybe we can find somebody with something and help each other.



TonyPrep, I wonder how common the "solution for business as usual" really is among us here on the board, though. I don't think it's very common. I think we've all pretty much settled on the idea things will change drastically no matter what we do. There are some who cling to the belief in the status quo, but I bet they are the small minority.
Ludi
 

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron