by Twilight » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 20:14:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n several speeches recently, Fed officials have indicated that they would not intervene to calm credit markets.
Ever since the Fed organized the 1998 bail-out of Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), a hedge fund that failed after making the wrong bets before the Russian debt crisis, investors have come to rely on the U.S. central bank's willingness to intervene in times of crises. This reliance on the Fed has been dubbed the "Greenspan put", a reference to then-Fed-Chief Alan Greenspan.
Source: MarketWatch
See, this is another problem compounding the big problem.
There's this idea that if things get too bad, the higher powers will step in to prop up the market because it is too important to go down. So with the existence of that safety net of last resort assumed, the traders think they can go to town on risk. They think their industry is so critical, they can take those extra risks, reap the rewards and if it all goes wrong, others will make sacrifices to pull them out of the fire.
I hate to burst their bubble (I make pun, haha!) but the US has
zero control over what unfolds on overseas markets, especially where opaque government vehicles are involved. It's not like they can step in with a full if/else picture of some black box full of tripwires sitting in Moscow.
What a
stupid assumption to make!
And they are staking their future on it?