Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Energy search goes underground

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Energy search goes underground

Postby Graeme » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 07:46:55

Energy search goes underground

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') study released this year by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said if 40 percent of the heat under the United States could be tapped, it would meet demand 56,000 times over. It said an investment of $800 million to $1 billion could produce more than 100 gigawatts of electricity by 2050, equaling the combined output of all 104 nuclear power plants in the U.S.

"The resource base for geothermal is enormous," Professor Jefferson Tester, the study's lead author, told The Associated Press.

But there are drawbacks — not just earthquakes but cost. A so-called hot rock well three miles deep in the United States would cost $7 million to $8 million, according to the MIT study. The average cost of drilling an oil well in the U.S. in 2004 was $1.44 million, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Also, rocks tapped by drilling would lose their heat after a few decades and new wells would have to be drilled elsewhere.

Bryan Mignone, an energy and climate-change specialist with the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., said alternative sources of energy face stiff price competition.

"Currently in the U.S. new technologies in the power sector are competing against coal, which is very cheap," he said.


Susan Petty, one of the 18 co-authors of the MIT study, works for Black Mountain Technology, a company promoting hot rock energy. She predicts that 10 percent of the world's power could come from geothermal sources in the next 50 years, from the current 0.3 percent, rising to half in around 100 years.


yahoo
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby wisconsin_cur » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 07:59:56

So will the physicists in the room help me out here.

The middle of the earth is hot because of gravity and friction? As the earth moves around the sun things are moved and squished and thereby produce heat?

Gravity is a function of mass and while, as an energy source, it is not created or destroyed it does seem like a truly "infinite" source since it is not "spent" in the process of burning it (ie the earth's core has been hot for a very long time.)

I freely confess that this is based on what I remember of my High School science class. What above is wrong with my analysis? What would be the drawback of using the earth internal heat on a massive scale? Could it produce an positive EROI assuming we have the resources and the good sense to use our current energy surplus to start the ball rolling?
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby lawnchair » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 08:23:53

Much of the geothermal energy is a result of spontaneous decay of mostly Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium-40. Eventually, most of these isotopes would decay and the core of the Earth will get colder. However, since their half-lives are on the order of 1e9 to 1e10 years, this source will only get to half its current power before the sun dies.
User avatar
lawnchair
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 08:31:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '
')Gravity is a function of mass and while, as an energy source, it is not created or destroyed it does seem like a truly "infinite" source since it is not "spent" in the process of burning it (ie the earth's core has been hot for a very long time.)

Gravity is not an energy source.
Dynamic systems subjected to gravity will produce energy, but static systems will not.
Large black holes are coldest items in Universe.

Gravity is also "spent" with time by means of emission of gravity waves (ripples of space time traveling with speed of light).
So remnant of Sun will fall on Segetarius A, sufficient time given.
Observations of neutron star binaries are confirming that phenomenon.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby Blacksmith » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 11:56:39

Deep wells pose a particular set of problems, particularly with regard to the mud system, as they found out in Iceland when they went deep. The mud system must cool the bit, remover cutting, and maintain the intergrety of the hole (by maintaining a pressure against the sides of the hole). You can solve some of you rock pressure problems by running casing, but then your hole gets smaller.
I am sure technology and good engineering will eventually beat the problem, but for now it is a consumation devoutly to be wished.
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby WatchfulEye » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 13:00:13

Does anyone have any hard figures for how long geothermal resources last?

The article alludes to a 'few decades', but how variable is this, and what sort of extraction profile is available?

I know that it places where heavy use has been made of geothermal resources (e.g. in Iceland, and some parts of California) they are finding that there reserves are 'tapped out' - and this isn't just individual wells that are tapped out, but potentially whole 'heat fields'.
User avatar
WatchfulEye
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu 07 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 13:06:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'T')he middle of the earth is hot because of gravity and friction? As the earth moves around the sun things are moved and squished and thereby produce heat?
Ok, first the heat in the earth is there because of friction, but friction from 5 billion years ago, not really from the friction happening today. When the planet formed, all the kinetic energy from solid star fragments (meteors) crashed together making a big molten soupy ball known as Earth. Since that time the earth has radiated heat into space and a cool crust has formed over the melt...

The Earth is like a cup of coffee

The earth is like a cup of coffee that was heated by simply shooting coffee beans, water and milk from a big gun into a very solid cup! The impact friction heated everything up and made coffee. Now the coffee is still swirling in the cup a little, but the cup is cooling. It already has coffee scum on the top and the grounds have settled to the bottom.

Mars was liquid and had active tectonics too, but being smaller then Earth it has solidified already. The moon was liquid but solidified since. My point with this is, friction doesn't keep a planet hot, they eventually cool down and turn solid.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lawnchair', 'M')uch of the geothermal energy is a result of spontaneous decay of mostly Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium-40.
This is also a good point. Our planet has a lot of fissile and will for a long time. Radioactive elements are part of the reason the earth is still soupy. Also deep radioactive hot spots are likely to be the cause of many volcanic hot spots, like the hot spot under Hawaii.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'i')e the earth's core has been hot for a very long time.
The earth is slowly cooling and solidifying.

Image
"The core is composed of mostly iron and nickel and remains very hot, even after 4.5 billion years of cooling. "

Here's one way to think of it. Lets say you made a mile deep sphere of cups of hot coffee and so the only way for heat to escape is by radiating though the closed lid of the top cup. In this case, it might take a million years for the cup of coffee in the center to get cool. The earth is a lot thicker and hotter, so it still has a lot of heat trapped inside.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'W')hat would be the drawback of using the earth internal heat on a massive scale? Could it produce an positive EROI assuming we have the resources and the good sense to use our current energy surplus to start the ball rolling?
There shouldn't be any drawbacks, except every few years you have to put in a new well. So the main problem would be the expense/availability of refined metals for drilling to keep installing new heat wells. Over all, I think geothermal has great potential for becoming a more widely used energy source. Of course, it will never be as free and easy or cheap as coal or gas was...
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby frankthetank » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 13:14:43

Just a thought, and this has been discussed on here before, but wouldn't it be easier to get at the hot stuff near the surface (Yellowstone/etc) then dig holes miles deep?
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:07:55

Small scale Geothermal
* Home heating/cooling systems like heat pumps are fairly easy to install and the shallow ground recharges seasonally.
* Air tubes though the ground can be used similarly to draw heat or cool air to maintain a more constant temperature for a dwelling.
* Caves, living in a cave would be the natural form of geothermal.

Image

Small scale geothermal probably has good prospects. Like if we go back to the stone age and end up living in caves! Hahaha :lol:
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:12:06

Large Scale Geothermal - for power generation
* Drawing heat for generators...
This requires intense heat to be near the surface or very high energy prices to be economical.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'J')ust a thought, and this has been discussed on here before, but wouldn't it be easier to get at the hot stuff near the surface (Yellowstone/etc) then dig holes miles deep?
Yeah, destroying Yellowstone national park to make a great big generating station would be more economical, as would siphoning heat off of Hawaiian volcanoes... Sticking a well deep into a random location in the earths crust costs a lot more.

Image
Economical geothermal energy sources are away from where most people live and close to areas already becoming less habitable due to climate change, such as the long term mega-drought desiccating the plains states. Of course, it still could be useful for electricity generation and energy intensive manufacturing processes such as aluminum refinement, if the prices for metals go way up.

Regarding the article, drilling three mile deep holes is possible and could make geothermal resources available for coastal populations. But this technology has not yet been implemented. It would be more expensive and less productive then traditional geothermal, but as the energy could be produced closer to where the population lives that could make up for the increased cost. So it could be a competitive energy source and certainly would be more reliable then wind power.

So aside from bringing up sulfur, arsenic and causing minor earthquakes... The technology might be implemented more someday in the future...

Image
Image

Problems: Well's may not last long and production methods can bring up large quantities of Sulfur and Arsenic...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s much as this is an interesting technology, it's not perfect. The geothermal steam that goes through the plant is also loaded with sulfur and arsenic, which all has to be scrubbed out before the steam can be released through the air. The amount of solid sulfur removed per day was quite a bit."

"Another thing to keep in mind, there are 61 projects in the works for 5000+ megawatts. For comparison, Diablo Canyon nuclear plant has two reactors, and each can produce over 1100+ megawatts. There is way more bang for the buck in other technologies, but they all have their drawbacks.

MIT-Led Study Says Geothermal Energy Is Viable
http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/0 ... 4214.shtml
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby Blacksmith » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:14:16

Small scale geothermal, with the exception of sea water, are really just a heat sink or storage system which requires energy to pump the fluid through the system. In addition thay are quite expensive to install and I question the economics.
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:17:39

Summary of my thoughts

The bankers think it is a very interesting study but no one is putting any money into this. Maybe it's a technology we could use in the future, but there is almost no implementation of this deep well stuff in the present. And at max production, it could only supply 10% of energy at 2005 levels. Plus it would dreg up huge volumes of arsenic...

:P
Last edited by steam_cannon on Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:23:02, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby Blacksmith » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:20:59

Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby frankthetank » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:36:09

steam-

I'm not serious. It was just a thought. Its never going to happen. This article is just more "we'll be saved by technology" bullshit. It's too late anyways.
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:41:34

The Deepest Hole
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Blacksmith', 'h')ttp://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/mar97/855593397.Es.r.html

http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=567
It's amusing; the Soviets drilled the deepest holes, shot up the first satellite, the first woman in space and they even collapsed first... But I'm sure we'll catch up, we alway have! :roll:
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby Blacksmith » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:44:27

It's called deficit spending.
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:49:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'J')ust a thought, and this has been discussed on here before, but wouldn't it be easier to get at the hot stuff near the surface (Yellowstone/etc) then dig holes miles deep?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 's')team-

I'm not serious. It was just a thought. Its never going to happen. This article is just more "we'll be saved by technology" bullshit. It's too late anyways.
I didn't think you were serious, but I could see it happening.

Seriously, in a collapsed US all the states and remaining economic elements would do whatever they could do to survive. If this means cutting the last tree in the forest, people will do it. If this means slash/burning national parks to make farmland, could happen too. And so could yellowstone be transformed from a spotted owl preserve into an energy mine / toxic waste dump? It could happen.

Just human nature ya know... :twisted:
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby Zardoz » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:57:27

I've been in the industrial supply business since 1972. I've sold a ton of stuff to the geothermal industry.

Theoretically, it's a great source of energy. The problem is the fantastic mineral content of the hot geothermal brine. You have to have mechanical equipment to recover the heat from the brine, and the super-heavy mineral content clogs, erodes, and corrodes the equipment something awful. I've been through many geothermal plant equipment boneyards, and the condition of the scrapped hardware is something to see.

It's been a while since I've had any contact with geothermal producers as I'm now working with different types of equipment, but the last I heard, the problem was not close to being solved. Personally, I don't see how it can be.

Down the road, when oil gets scarce, perhaps the economics of geothermal power will look better. For now it's still an expensive way to generate electricity. I think it always will be.

(BTW, for reference, here's the official site of the largest geothermal plant in the world:

The Geysers )
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 16:04:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('steam_cannon', '[')b]The Deepest Hole
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Blacksmith', 'h')ttp://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/mar97/855593397.Es.r.html

http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=567
It's amusing; the Soviets drilled the deepest holes, shot up the first satellite, the first woman in space and they even collapsed first... But I'm sure we'll catch up, we alway have! :roll:

...and first man in space as well.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Energy search goes underground

Postby steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 17:35:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '.')..and first man in space as well.
Yeah, but I figured people already knew that. By the way, today I'm wearing my sputnik pin. My wife's mother was a communications engineer for the soviet space program and her brother still does that sort of work, so I have lots of pins. My favorite is from Baikonur... :-D

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyway, getting back to the topic...

Geothermal didn't save the soviets (so don't expect it to save US.)

Soviet Geothermal Engineering
"Geothermal power plants are still used only locally."
http://www.gateway2russia.com/art.php?a ... 163&rubid=

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

But Geothermal in Russia is still steaming along
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Russian Geothermal Program

The launch of such a Program is favorably conditioned by the following factors:

* 4000 geothermal wells have been drilled in the country; the Government has spent over US$ 6 billion on exploration and drilling activities (estimated in current prices);

* The Government of Russia defined modernization of the utility sector and development of appropriate infrastructure as one of the cooperation areas with the World Bank (WB);

* The Energy Strategy of Russia requires new RES-operated capacities to be commissioned prior to 2010, i.e. 7000 MW(e) and 1200 MW(th).

The cost of first demonstration projects to be implemented in the next 5 years can be evaluated at US$ 500 million, most of which will be attracted in the form of soft loans.

Sergei. I. Kruglik
Federal Building, Housing and Utilities Agency (Rosstroy)

http://www.geotherm.ru/eng/programme.asp

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Russia Geothermal

Russia possesses vast geothermal resources, and over 3,000 wells have been drilled to take advantage. At present the geothermal energy is used in Russian Federation both for heat supply and electricity production.

Direct utilization of thermal water with temperature 30–100 °C for heating and hot water supply of buildings, for agricultural needs (heating of green houses and cattle raising farms), for fish breeding, in local industry, in balneology and for swimming pools takes place mainly at the Northern Cauca sia (Krasnodar and Stavropol Territories, Republic Dagestan, Adygei Region, Karachai-Cherkessia) an at Far East (peninsula Kamchatka, Kuriles). Locally the thermal water is also used in the separate settlements of Western Siberia, near Lake Baikal, in Magadan and Chukot regions and at Sakhalin. At Kamchatka there are the experimental plants for using thermal water in combination with heat pumps...

http://tinyurl.com/2wjang
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top


Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron