by steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:12:06
Large Scale Geothermal - for power generation
* Drawing heat for generators...
This requires intense heat to be near the surface or very high energy prices to be economical.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'J')ust a thought, and this has been discussed on here before, but wouldn't it be easier to get at the hot stuff near the surface (Yellowstone/etc) then dig holes miles deep?
Yeah, destroying Yellowstone national park to make a great big generating station would be more economical, as would siphoning heat off of Hawaiian volcanoes... Sticking a well deep into a random location in the earths crust costs a lot more.

Economical geothermal energy sources are away from where most people live and close to areas already becoming less habitable due to climate change, such as the long term mega-drought desiccating the plains states. Of course, it still could be useful for electricity generation and energy intensive manufacturing processes such as aluminum refinement, if the prices for metals go way up.
Regarding the article, drilling three mile deep holes is possible and could make geothermal resources available for coastal populations. But this technology has not yet been implemented. It would be more expensive and less productive then traditional geothermal, but as the energy could be produced closer to where the population lives that could make up for the increased cost. So it could be a competitive energy source and certainly would be more reliable then wind power.
So aside from bringing up sulfur, arsenic and causing minor earthquakes... The technology
might be implemented more
someday in the future...

Problems: Well's may not last long and production methods can
bring up large quantities of Sulfur and Arsenic...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s much as this is an interesting technology, it's not perfect. The geothermal steam that goes through the plant is also
loaded with sulfur and arsenic, which all has to be scrubbed out before the steam can be released through the air. The amount of solid sulfur removed per day was quite a bit."
"Another thing to keep in mind, there are 61 projects in the works for 5000+ megawatts. For comparison, Diablo Canyon nuclear plant has two reactors, and each can produce over 1100+ megawatts. There is way more bang for the buck in other technologies, but they all have their drawbacks.
MIT-Led Study Says Geothermal Energy Is Viable
http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/0 ... 4214.shtml