by Tyler_JC » Fri 13 Jul 2007, 20:07:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'A')lthough the article was written from the US perspective, demographic trends in the US alone are irrelevant. This applies to the world, not the US.
I wholeheartedly disagree.
In the future, travel will become more difficult and more expensive.
Meaning, total immigration will likely decrease.
Countries like New Zealand may see a dramatic decline in immigration.
It is entirely possible for New Zealand's population to level out and decline without having to worry about foreigners "overrunning" their country.
I don't understand why people who believe that transportation fuel is going to run out also believe that sustainable countries will be overrun by refugees from non-sustainable countries.
How will they get from point A to point B, walking?
As for the United States, we have a large and formidable ocean on either side of the country. Canada has a small and slowly growing population (also as a result of immigration).
So the only border we have to worry about is Mexico.
It is certainly possible that a nationalist president of the USA will demand action to stop illegal immigration from Mexico, especially if the US population is suffering from the results of economic recession.
In that scenario, the only demographic trends that should worry Americans are the demographic trends that are occuring inside the United States itself.
Let Ethiopia double in population every 20 years. It just doesn't matter if they can only stay inside Ethiopia.