by JPL » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 13:21:07
... here is the translation of third and last part of the Le Monde - IEA interview.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
.
.
Is there a short-term risk?
I'm resting on the assumption that the average rate of depletion of existing oilfields is 8 percent per year. This is already a lot: for each dollar invested in extraction, we have to invest three dollars to compensate for this decline. But what would happen, on all fronts, if this decline rate was 9 percent? The additional quantity of oil that would need to be found to compensate for this difference is equal to the entire projected increase in demand of the OECD out till 2020.
Saudi Arabia admits to a rapid decline in several of its main fields...
I can confirm that Saudi Arabia is capable of attaining a production capacity of 15 million barrrels per day by 2015, as against 12 today - this comes from the Saudi Oil Minister, Ali Al-Nouaimi. However these additional 3 million barrels is all we can look forward to to meet the envisiged rise in world oil demand (this demand is 83 MBPD today).
And Iraq?
If Iraqi production does not increase exponentially between now and 2015, we have a massive problem, even if Saudi Arabia fully meets it commitments. The figures are very simple, there is no need to be an expert. All you have to do is one subtraction. China is going to grow very fast, and India also, and the Saudi increase, the 3 MBPD extra, is not enough to even cover the additional Chinese demand.
But, given the actual situation in Iraq, it is very umprobable that this country is going to reach its optimum capacity just like that!
If this situation improved dramatically, how long would it take the Iraqi petrolium industry to reach its full capacity?
The Iraqi officials talk of 3 to 5 years. They know better than me. Even if they are correct, and all goes well in Iraq, it will in any event be a long process.
So I repeat, the oil industry faces a serious test between now and 2015. With the decline of production outside of OPEC and the peak in growth of China, the gap between supply and demand will widen to a significant degree.
What happens to the oil majors in this new game, which, according to you, will be increasingly dominated by the producers cartel?
These "majors" (Exxon, Chevron-Texaco, Shell, BP and Total) will be in trouble. They will not have access to new sources of production. They need to re-define their strategies, if they remain focussed on oil, they will have to be content with niche markets.
You are saying that they won't be "majors" much longer?
This is what I am telling you. In spite of the big increase in the price per barrel, which has enabled them to invest, they have not been able to increase their reserves! (Translators note - there is a reference here to a graph which is not included so I have dropped it).
So if things don not improve in Iraq...
... There is a wall, a great test in front of us, if the Western powers and also China and India do not make substantial changes to their energy policies, increase taxes on oil, and research more into energy conservation.
We are really not going to take this road. Global oil consumption is growing more and more quickly.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of talking, but very little action. I really hope that the consumer nations will understand the gravity of the situation, and put in place strong and radical policies to slow down the growth in oil demand.
OK I will stop here. The interview goes on but it is then talking about the impact of Chinese growth of climate change and I don't want to sidetrack us again!
So, here we have it guys, looks as if the IEA is finally doing the job it was set up to do all those years ago - to keep an eye on the oil markets and OPEC and warn us if we were ever facing a 70's-style oil shock. Their chief economost has now sent the balloon up. We're in trouble - official.
Lets hope the world's leaders now have the collective wisdom to listen.
JP