by kabu » Thu 05 Jul 2007, 14:50:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '
')Your claims about the Taliban not having a reason to extradite the Al Qaeda mass murderers prior to the US invasion of Afghanistan is historically inaccurate.....I assumed you were ignorant of the facts when I suggested you read the "Looming Tower", but perhaps you just don't care about the facts.
The US had ALREADY been trying for years to get the Taliban to cooperate on extradition when the 9/11 attacks occurred.
It's not that I don't care; it's just that you can't reason your position very well.
I asked for relevant facts. Just because the US did have- at least I assume that they did- sufficient evidence to make the case for extradition based upon
other (long overdue) events, does not mean that they have sufficient evidence to make the case for extradition in relation to 9/11. Yet, they bombed a sovereign nation- with a government that they got into power in the first place- because they were "harbouring" the one responsible for 9/11. If the "do it or die" extradition was in relation to the events from the 90s, then they would have destroyed the Afghanistan in the 90s, rather then invite the Taliban over for some tea in the late 90s.
It's because people like you can't distinguish one event from another, that authors, maybe like one that wrote "The Looming Tower", can so easily blend it all together, delivering you a perfectly acceptable pretext. The world is a very complicated place. Try taking a closer look, next time.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'A')l Qaida attacks murdered hundreds of people in the 90s...for instance in Africa they bombed two US embassies, and they murdered more when they attacked the USS Cole. In both these cases, as well as others in the 90s, the US was unble to get cooperation, much less extradition assistance from the Taliban.

And yet it certainly didn't stop the US from trying to do lots of other business with the Taliban, after the fact.