by TWilliam » Tue 26 Jun 2007, 01:53:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he cell phone issue is also a fake one drummed up by the conspiracy advocates. They advance the red herring that such calls are "impossible" from 30,000 feet, but back in the real world the hijackers flew lower once they got control of the planes so the calls on 9/11 were never made from 30,000 feet altitude anyway.

Uhhh... no. Those figures are from your precious 9/11 Commission Report. Tho' if you wish to call them liars that's fine. We already know they are anyway, but you're welcome to add your voice...
Additionally, if we wish to assume that the flight data recorder file obtained from the NTSB is in fact from flight 77, then we know from it that flight 77 remained above 25,000 for at least 80% of the time that it was allegedly under hijacker control, and that it only descended below that point once it started final approach to the target. Your assertion is therefore false on at least two counts.
If, instead, you wish to maintain that this record and/or the relevant information in the 9/11 Commission Report is false, then you are left in the position of admitting the record to be a forgery, and/or the Report's statements to be lies, in which case you have now acknowledged that at least one or two pieces of evidence provided by the government are admittedly false. If you admit one, then you are forced to admit the possibility that the
entire version of events as portrayed in The Official Conspiracy[sup]tm[/sup] is likewise a fabrication.
And by the way, stop distorting my position, as in:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', 't')he plane was traveling so fast that it "vaporized" on impact
Your idea that the plane vaporized on impact seems unlikely, although the force of impact and subsequent combustion of the jet fuel and anything flammable around the plane does seem adequate to have destroyed some of the plane.