by Ingenuity_Gap » Mon 18 Jun 2007, 19:25:54
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('orionis', 'H')ey folks, i got a few questions for you.
As most of you may know there are medical programs out there that uses the computing powers of personal computers all over the world as an alternative to renting computing time with the mammoth computers to run calculations for their research.
It has had many results that would have otherwise been un-attainable without years of laborious calculations.
basically you download a program that lets the researchers use some of your cpu to run calculations. Multiply that by thousands of computers and you have an extremely powerfull tool.
So here is my questions:
Would it make a difference at all if public awareness was raised to the point where millions of computers worked around the clock on things like Nuclear fusion research and other alternative energies?
If by having such a program on your computer your goverment would give you an incentive to run it as much as possible would this not become mainstream and common in most households?
To get the response you desire, you need to ask the right question.
You ask about alternative energy (nuclear fusion included). To what end? To do what? Why do we need so much energy?
A good step in the right direction would be to ask: what is wrong with this picture (mankind in the 21st century)? Why are so many on this site worried about the future?
Our inability to see the connection between phenomena is our main disadvantage. You have to realize that energy is connected to population levels, resource depletion and pollution.
Remember the IPAT equation?
Impact on environment = Population x Affluence x Technology
If you increase the available energy (to avoid a short term economic and population crash) you create the perfect ground for more population increase, worsening the resource depletion and accelerating the pollution. After you develop nuclear fusion and the population reaches 10 billion, you will need an even more exotic type of energy to sustain that population.
Even if the population stays constant, everybody wants to live the American dream, have a car, a house, a good job. Now imagine 1 billion Chinese (already on the march) attaining the affluence levels of North Americans. Then 1 billion Indians and so on. Do you really think that this Earth can sustain so many prosperous people? We would soon choke in our own feces.
There are limits and energy availability is but one of them.
Our technological approach is wrong. Technology has side-effects; always. What we do is try to fix those old side-effects with new technology. In the meantime we greatly increase the complexity of our society at all levels. We are reactive instead of being proactive.
Our financial, economic and business model based on growth is generating all the problems.
Our mindset needs to change.
I, for one, don't think that is possible. We are still mammals. We are bound to growth by our reproductive instincts. We are different from other mammals because we created a society, economy, technology. Unfortunately everything we create is based on growth. If this Earth would be infinite, it could work. But it’s not.
"The world is becoming too complex and too fast-paced to manage." - Thomas Homer-Dixon