This is s strange article, as it claims a utility, Hydro-Quebec, manipulated prices along the U.S. northeast poweer corridor over a period of time. See link
First off, it would only provide a small share of the power demand. And, presumably, the independent powoer authority would be smart enough to realizxe it was being overcharged. Hydro-Quebec wasn't sellking the juice to Ma and Pa Clampett.
Secondly, its government owned, and that is not the kind of behaior you'd think of from a government. Unlike Enron, what would the principal officers of Hydro-Quebec have to gain by breaking the law?
Lastly, how would the lawsuit be enforceable, as the head office is not even in the U.S., just some sales office with miniscule assets, so what could the claimants attach even if they won the case?



