by mkwin » Thu 07 Jun 2007, 18:00:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', 'I') made a rather simply statement about quite basic economics and you called it nonsense.
This is the basic problem here; we're all talking past each other. You keep trying to educate us on the basics of economic theory, and MQ is telling you we've been there. Check the threads.
I'll be the last person to argue with anyone about likely global depletion rates; I just don't know enough. But I
am betting the farm, as it were, that the
currently accepted basic tenets of financial market dynamics will not be able to hold together for long in an era of permanently restricting energy supplies. Smith's invisible hand is going to get quite a swat as the magic carpet of cheap energy is pulled from under us.
Please pardon the mixed metaphors. But an ebb tide lowers all boats.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', 'S')hell and BP are trading at less than 10 times earning - i.e. you get your money back in 10 years. Given the likelihood that we will be producing and consuming all available oil for decades after peak oil, it looks like an easy call to me.
Cool. Go for it. Good luck.