Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Tanker Truck Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

THE Tanker Truck Thread (merged)

Unread postby Troyboy1208 » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 11:41:28

Now this is something you dont want to have to deal with Monday morning:

Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway
Last edited by Ferretlover on Tue 28 Apr 2009, 11:36:11, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merge thread.
User avatar
Troyboy1208
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed 26 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Orlando FL

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby cynicalheretic » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 12:02:36

Well, gas prices are going up. lol
cynicalheretic
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu 02 Nov 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 12:03:56

www.cnn.com

... now has footage of the tanker in flames and the collapsed upper freeway. This is going to make for an interesting commute... apparently this is on the WB approach to the Bay Bridge and it's now destroyed.

Let's see how fast this freeway can be rebuilt.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby Eli » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 14:12:31

Let me be the first to point out the obvious.

This was an obvious controlled demolition. Gasoline burns at 1256 Fahrenheit there is no way that is hot enough to bring down a concrete overpass.


The sheeple are so easily fooled.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby lateStarter » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 15:52:56

Perhaps Raphael can explain to us the significance of the numbers '80', '580', and '880' and how it relates to this number:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')asoline burns at 1256 Fahrenheit


Any comments from the driver yet, or did he just disappear into the night?

Monday, Monday... No guarantee... (or something like that)
We have been brought into the present condition in which we are unable neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them. - Livy
User avatar
lateStarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 38 km west of Warsaw, Poland

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 15:58:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', 'L')et me be the first to point out the obvious.

This was an obvious controlled demolition. Gasoline burns at 1256 Fahrenheit there is no way that is hot enough to bring down a concrete overpass.


The sheeple are so easily fooled.


Obviously! Burning fuel cannot heat metal enough to collapse steel! :razz:

From the article...
Engineers said the concrete roadway's steel underbelly seems to have heated to a sufficient temperature to bend the metal, which then pulled the roadbed off its supports.

Guess that kinda fucks up all those conspiracy theories doesnt it. 8O :lol:
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby MD » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 15:59:51

It doesn't even have to burn if it's an asphalt roadway. Go pour some gasoline on your driveway as a test. Gasoline turns asphalt into loose pebbles.

Set it on fire and the roadway will burn and melt away in no time.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby Newsseeker » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 17:06:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MD', 'I')t doesn't even have to burn if it's an asphalt roadway. Go pour some gasoline on your driveway as a test. Gasoline turns asphalt into loose pebbles.

Set it on fire and the roadway will burn and melt away in no time.


Which begs the question why would TPTB want to bring down this overpass? Why not the bridges going into Manhattan island. Now that's a target. Viewing this as controlled demolition is not realistic in my opinion.
Newsseeker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu 12 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 17:36:56

Oh goodness everyone. This is a gas truck accident. Period.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 19:39:22

Yeah, I heard about it this morning, they had "Dr Bill Wattenburg" on too, explaining that he and his shadowy group had been studying this for years, that laden tanker trucks are an accident waiting to happen, and if one gets into the hands of a terrorist, can do a lot of harm.

Not that this is the situation here, it's just a stupid fucking early morning truck accident.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 19:41:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'E')ngineers said the concrete roadway's steel underbelly seems to have heated to a sufficient temperature to bend the metal, which then pulled the roadbed off its supports.

Guess that kinda fucks up all those conspiracy theories doesnt it.


It does.....but then the conspiracy theories were never based on logic or evidence. :-D
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 19:48:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', '
')
Which begs the question why would TPTB want to bring down this overpass? Why not the bridges going into Manhattan island. Now that's a target. Viewing this as controlled demolition is not realistic in my opinion.


Because Bush wants to regain support for his constitutional amendment to ban homosexual marriage.

And he figures that if he and the rest of The Powers That Be can wipe out enough Prius-driving San Francisco homosexual lawyers who might accidently drive over this destroyed overpass, the opposition to his amendment will vanish. :roll:
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 19:52:55

The funny art about that is, though, that California is not reallly a blue state - it's purple. It's about evenly red and blue, and there are tons of SUV-driving rednecks even in the Bay Area. In fact, one day I was noticing that really quite a lot of people here wear cowboy boots. Now I have lived in a Democrat stronghold, and the only place I saw cowboy boots worn then was on TV, on John Wayne lol. Also, white "urban" music is popular here, there's also Ranchero, which is hispanic rednecky sort of stuff, and country, or KUNT'ry, is "real popular" here.

A piece of bridge out is is more likely to bag SUVs than Prii.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 19:56:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'T')he funny art about that is, though, that California is not reallly a blue state - it's purple. It's about evenly red and blue, and there are tons of SUV-driving rednecks even in the Bay Area. In fact, one day I was noticing that really quite a lot of people here wear cowboy boots. Now I have lived in a Democrat stronghold, and the only place I saw cowboy boots worn then was on TV, on John Wayne lol. Also, white "urban" music is popular here, there's also Ranchero, which is hispanic rednecky sort of stuff, and country, or KUNT'ry, is "real popular" here.

A piece of bridge out is is more likely to bag SUVs than Prii.


But the guy in the Hummer has a higher likely hood of surviving than the guy in the Honda.

Ergo, on the whole, a broken bridge is more likely to kill a Democrat.

Additionally, Republicans are far more likely to drive in a car by themselves rather than carpool. So even if 1 Republican car and 1 Democrat car each go off of the bridge, the odds are that the death ratio was 3-1 in favor of Bush.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 19:58:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '
')But the guy in the Hummer has a higher likely hood of surviving than the guy in the Honda.

Ergo, on the whole, a broken bridge is more likely to kill a Democrat.

Additionally, Republicans are far more likely to drive in a car by themselves rather than carpool. So even if 1 Republican car and 1 Democrat car each go off of the bridge, the odds are that the death ratio was 3-1 in favor of Bush.


Hm, good points! Let's see ... actually SUVs do not do well for their passengers in roll-overs, and I suppose falling off a bridge would be one....

And, as whacky and way-out as the Bay Area is, it's still part of Amurrika. NO ONE car pools. NO ONE.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ
Top

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 20:10:16

Hummer Crash Test Ratings
Prius Crash Test Rating

Looks like the Hummer beats the Prius in terms of Frontal Crashes For the driver.

And if you fall off a big overpass, I think you might possibly fall front-first (the weight of that big V-8 engine)

The Hummer also wins in side-impact tests for both the driver and the passengers.

So if the car spins on its sides, you're better off in the Hummer.

Basically unless it lands on its top, you have a better chance of surviving in the Hummer.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Sun 29 Apr 2007, 20:47:03

OK ok I'll give you that. Frankly the Prius is not made to play bumper-cars with.

Travel in that area's going to be a real Kunstlerfuck* in the morning


*Kunstlerfuck - clusterfuck traceable directly to the dependence on oil and on car travel.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby pup55 » Mon 30 Apr 2007, 12:10:51

Well let's see....

Let's say that these 280,000 commuters have to drive an extra 10 miles out of their way in the morning and also at night because this bridge is out: That's 5.6 extra million vehicle miles. But maybe we will get really lucky and at least half of them will carpool. That's 2.8 million vehicle miles, so this will still cause an extra fuel consumption (at 20 miles per gallon) of 3,333 barrels of oil per day (140,000 thousand gallons at 42 gallons per barrel).

But then let's also say that the resultant traffic jams around the city caused by these poor commuters having to go around the problem somehow will affect 3 times as many commuters, and the traffic will slow down to the extent that they are burning an extra half gallon of gas per day because of the screwed up traffic. 840,000 commuters, .5 gallons per commuter, 420K gallons).

That's another 10,000 barrels of oil per day, for a total of about 13,333 barrels of oil per day for this one catastrophe.

So over the next roughly 75 days this will add up to an additional million barrels of oil. Those of us that follow the inventory reports well know that this part of the country is the very worst from the standpoint of inventory, and also, that the system is on edge as it is. But this illustrates the actions of some truck driver at 3am has a big magnifying effect throughout the entire system.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 30 Apr 2007, 12:32:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '
')So over the next roughly 75 days this will add up to an additional million barrels of oil.


B-b-but, won't this only slightly offset the energy conserved from the earlier Daylight Savings Time?

Oh wait, there were no savings. :roll: :lol:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Gasoline Tanker Truck Destroys San Francisco Roadway

Unread postby strider3700 » Mon 30 Apr 2007, 12:37:02

Ahh but they will simply mismanage the additional traffic requirements so badly that people will give up on commuting via car and demand an alternative. The city will be free to cram some form of mass tranit through in order to deal with the congestion in an emergency situation and demand destruction can be forced on the people.

The CIA took out the road at the request of the city who recieved kick backs from the bus manufacturers. The 200 ft tall flames caught on video will make it easy to explain why years from now the road still hasn't been repaired

;)
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron