by Twilight » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 13:12:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JasonHam', 'A')nd, why is it when you try to talk about this stuff with family or friends or anybody outside this message board, they have nothing to say.
There are three groups of people from whom that response is understandable - the uneducated, the ageing and the escapists.
The first are little more than animals in terms of behavioural complexity, with no greater light of intelligence guiding their collection of social security, participation in conflict and reproduction than is observed in lab rats pushing a button to receive a food pellet. Debate there is futile, and interaction comes only of social obligation.
The second are those who have the luxury of saying "I don't care about 2020, I'll be an old man", and they have a point.
The third are those who are so emotionally fried by the day jobs they can't contemplate leaving, that they won't accept any negativity in a social setting. It's hard to care about your future when the present has driven you to undiagnosed stress or depression. The future does not exist, it would take nothing less than a confirmed K-T boundary impact in 2020 to snap them out of their trap and force them to reassess their priorities.
This often goes unrecognised by those who bemoan resistance to change - many people just aren't reachable for lifestyle reasons. Not even the most die-hard campaigner can raise the awareness of someone effectively not present for the discussion. This imposes a solid ceiling on the effectiveness of any public information effort, and I would bet changing lifestyles mean it has been steadily falling. I would also bet that governments (now embracing the term "voter apathy") are well aware (and quietly frustrated) that an ever-growing slice of their citizens are in territory marked "New ideas shall not pass", with all that implies for their freedom of maneuvre.
Then there is the largest and best-known group, those limited by the psychology of past investment. No-one who has given years of their life in the service of some cause will willingly recognise its obsolescence. I invested my youth, money and self-esteem in learning about energy and engineering, and derive my income from it, so when this area throws up some new issues, paying attention comes naturally. Had I invested my youth, money and self-esteem (this last bit is particularly important) in learning all about advertising, and derived my income from that, I would be very, very resistant to hearing my work and place in the world described as 'GDP from waste and inefficiency', and hearing that an invisible section of the economy existing at a far lower level of abstraction is going to put me out of business.
The number of open-minded people educationally and socio-economically well-placed to constructively respond to an argument, is therefore not only limited, but as specialisation and abstraction of labour grows in industrial economies, probably
diminishing.
Everyone who tries to persuade friends, family, the public, of their take on some issue, whether it is tax policy, climate change or peak oil, is going to run into these obstacles. That's why I think educating people on any future challenges is now futile. We seem to have moved past the point where it produces any measurable improvements. And so while they talk with excitement about how airport expansion and cheaper flights are going to improve their quality of life, I just "mhmm", and if they had any sense, those who have already heard my opposing views should feel some unease at the fact that I no longer elaborate.