Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil - A Conspiracy Theory?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby MattSavinar » Tue 03 Apr 2007, 20:55:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'P')erhaps.

Let's suppose people accept Peak Oil. Then they recognize that the era of exponential growth is at an end. What happens?

1) Stock market crash. No growth equal low stock valuations.

2) Social turmoil. The pie will not grow - it will shrink. The poor will never have a chance to "get a piece". How will that play?

3) Political turmoil. Forget Social Security and all those other social programs. The system won't even be able to pay debt service. How will the voters respond?



You forgot to mention the (obligatory)

4. Halliburton work camps,

5. hoardes of Blackwater contractors seizing the peasents and feeding them into thermal depolymerization machines

6. terminator robots doing "cleanup" operations above ground as the global elite descend into their underground cities to be fueled by the tp machines from #5

Come on Jack, you're off your game a bit today.
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby americandream » Tue 03 Apr 2007, 20:57:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '
')It is a shame we will have to meet in mortal combat following the peak.


Lol...there's a Jack in every neighbourhood from Hunan to Alice Springs.

But then again, there's a Red Devil like me around to keep em good.

Don't fret Matt me ol mate, there's good in them thar hills.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby cynthia » Wed 04 Apr 2007, 02:57:41

Speaking of neighborhoods and conspiracy, I harken back to 2002 and VP activity that was certainly planned to span more than two terms...
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington ... asts_x.htm
cynthia
User avatar
cynthia
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby killJOY » Wed 04 Apr 2007, 07:17:35

Matt,

I'm trying to laugh, but I can't...
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby Jack » Wed 04 Apr 2007, 10:07:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', '
')Come on Jack, you're off your game a bit today.


I'll work on it. I have to be ready for the final conflict you alluded to earlier. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby AFO » Wed 04 Apr 2007, 18:04:19

Based on the report, the non-opec oil production will peak around 2010 (figure 10 - Pg. 26), and if Saudi Arabia & Iran (the 2 highest opec producing countries) are lying on their reserves capacity & production, then most probably peak will happen before 2010.

Care to comment on my analysis?
User avatar
AFO
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu 15 Feb 2007, 04:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 18:16:35

This issue is not much covered because nobody much cares.


I've said it before, I'll say it again NOBODY CARES.


It's simply a non-issue to most people.
Ludi
 

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 19:24:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'T')his issue is not much covered because nobody much cares.


I've said it before, I'll say it again NOBODY CARES.


It's simply a non-issue to most people.


People take their cues from the media, so it's not that they don't care, they just don't take it seriously until it comes out of the mouth of several authority figures, repeatedly. Emphasis is the key; after all, it is a seismic shift in world view, we're talking here. Change in thought patterns and emotional adjustments, take time and reinforcement.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 21:15:41

What is the precise difference between "they don't care" and "they don't take it seriously"?


If someone does not take something seriously, they generally don't care about it. If they don't care about it, they don't take it seriously.
Ludi
 

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 22:54:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')hat is the precise difference between "they don't care" and "they don't take it seriously"?


If someone does not take something seriously, they generally don't care about it. If they don't care about it, they don't take it seriously.


There is a huge difference. If I told you we were being visited by other dimensional or extra terrestrial beings, with superior technology, and they might not all be friendly, you likely wouldn't take me seriously. It's not that you actually don't care. If a panel of astronauts, followed by a governor from a major state, disclosed the same information, and it was the feature story on CBS evening news, you would care, because you would take them seriously. That is, if you are a typical academic, given the same prejudices and assumptions of your class, level of education, and religious (or lack of) affiliation.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby pea-jay » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 01:09:42

I'm of the mind that there is no vast conspiracy of the Iron Triangle or anyother entity. People are generally stupid. They will assume what happened yesterday will predict tomorrow and if somebody offers a vision of tomorrow that differs greatly from that, they're apt to reject it unless they see direct evidence of it. $3 buck gas isnt going to cut it. The only conspiracies you'll hear then is classic "theyre gouging us again"

Like I said, most people are stupid. Never underestimate the power of collective stupidity. Too bad our species didnt have a few more millenia to evolve out those bad traits before stumbling onto petroleum.
UNplanning the future...
http://unplanning.blogspot.com
User avatar
pea-jay
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1547
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: NorCal

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby JasonHam » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 02:28:41

I think most people dismiss Peak Oil because , at this stage at least, it seems the "cult-like" doomers have taken to it like white on rice. When you start talking about Civilzation ending and a new Dark age starting in just a few years, nothing you say after that is heard. You fall into the Y2K,Rapture, Waco, Aliens taking over the world category. 99% of the population thinks you are little "wacky". In fact, i think the phrase peak -oil will be replaced with something else.
User avatar
JasonHam
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby retiredguy » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 11:00:18

To people who bother to pay attention PO is just another idiot standing on the street corner shouting that the end is near.

They've heard these stories before. From Tillich through the oil embargos of the 70's. So where are we at today? Gas is still affordable and the sky has not fallen. Why would they believe the most recent crop of scaremongers?

The only way this issue would command attention from the masses is if someone or group of someones the media pays close attention to would act as the PO spokesman. But who among the PTB will be the first to publicly endorse PO?

By the time this happens, most people in the country will also be aware.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby JasonHam » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 11:15:28

Why would they believe the most recent crop of scaremongers?

Exactly. And it seems that the world is full of scaremongering right now. I don't think people are scared, but aprehensive might be a good word. And when it comes to the end of the civilization scenarios, Peak-Oil, doesnt even make the top 5.

I'm not a doomer, but I do think they have a place. Maybe if the doomers didnt bring so much attention to Y2K business/government wouldnt have spent so much money to fix it.

But retiredguy is right; Peak-Oil needs a spokesperson who doesn't claim were all Doomed. I personally think , eventually, peak -oil, will be bundled into a phrase or term like "Energy Crisis". Global warming is sort of becoming Climate Change. How many years went by when the majority viewed Global Warming as "a fringe element". Now, if you say Global Warming/Climate Change is false, it's almost like lighting a cigarette up at kids soccer game.

I think peak-oil will get its day. Whether its called Peak-oil? I'm not so sure.
User avatar
JasonHam
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby Twilight » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 12:03:03

Most people have accepted global warming / climate change, but are they doing something constructive about it? No. Does it look as though they will? No. Will their understanding therefore affect the material outcome? No.

If peak oil is the same, if all it needs is a socially acceptable spokesperson to reach mainstream opinion, then the aforementioned experience suggests it won't matter whether people understand the situation or not, and it will merely result in the addition of a new philosophy of crisis to compete for the same amount of attention. The best we can expect is for people to place the right name to what's impoverishing them.

These days in practice, raising public awareness of any major issue seems to be done for its own sake, as inertia is so great, there is little prospect of influencing outcomes. I don't even mention resource depletion to people I know any more and "mhmm" noncommittally in conversation because there is no point in adding a new note of discord. Joseph A. Tainter discussed eleven major themes in collapse. #4 Insufficient response to circumstances - check.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby JasonHam » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 12:13:03

I agree Twilight.

And, why is it when you try to talk about this stuff with family or friends or anybody outside this message board, they have nothing to say. No response at all, no questions, no comments, nothing.....................................................................

You either get a complete change of subject , a blank stare or the "are you a nutball?" stare.

I know, I know people dont care, they are in denial, they dont believe in all the resource depletion stuff, ......I just dont get it.....
User avatar
JasonHam
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby Twilight » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 13:12:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JasonHam', 'A')nd, why is it when you try to talk about this stuff with family or friends or anybody outside this message board, they have nothing to say.

There are three groups of people from whom that response is understandable - the uneducated, the ageing and the escapists.

The first are little more than animals in terms of behavioural complexity, with no greater light of intelligence guiding their collection of social security, participation in conflict and reproduction than is observed in lab rats pushing a button to receive a food pellet. Debate there is futile, and interaction comes only of social obligation.

The second are those who have the luxury of saying "I don't care about 2020, I'll be an old man", and they have a point.

The third are those who are so emotionally fried by the day jobs they can't contemplate leaving, that they won't accept any negativity in a social setting. It's hard to care about your future when the present has driven you to undiagnosed stress or depression. The future does not exist, it would take nothing less than a confirmed K-T boundary impact in 2020 to snap them out of their trap and force them to reassess their priorities.

This often goes unrecognised by those who bemoan resistance to change - many people just aren't reachable for lifestyle reasons. Not even the most die-hard campaigner can raise the awareness of someone effectively not present for the discussion. This imposes a solid ceiling on the effectiveness of any public information effort, and I would bet changing lifestyles mean it has been steadily falling. I would also bet that governments (now embracing the term "voter apathy") are well aware (and quietly frustrated) that an ever-growing slice of their citizens are in territory marked "New ideas shall not pass", with all that implies for their freedom of maneuvre.

Then there is the largest and best-known group, those limited by the psychology of past investment. No-one who has given years of their life in the service of some cause will willingly recognise its obsolescence. I invested my youth, money and self-esteem in learning about energy and engineering, and derive my income from it, so when this area throws up some new issues, paying attention comes naturally. Had I invested my youth, money and self-esteem (this last bit is particularly important) in learning all about advertising, and derived my income from that, I would be very, very resistant to hearing my work and place in the world described as 'GDP from waste and inefficiency', and hearing that an invisible section of the economy existing at a far lower level of abstraction is going to put me out of business.

The number of open-minded people educationally and socio-economically well-placed to constructively respond to an argument, is therefore not only limited, but as specialisation and abstraction of labour grows in industrial economies, probably diminishing.

Everyone who tries to persuade friends, family, the public, of their take on some issue, whether it is tax policy, climate change or peak oil, is going to run into these obstacles. That's why I think educating people on any future challenges is now futile. We seem to have moved past the point where it produces any measurable improvements. And so while they talk with excitement about how airport expansion and cheaper flights are going to improve their quality of life, I just "mhmm", and if they had any sense, those who have already heard my opposing views should feel some unease at the fact that I no longer elaborate.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby retiredguy » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 13:46:42

Great post Twilight. However, there are some of us who will be really old in 2020, who have success in their lives under the current melieu, and therefore, have a vested interest in the status quo who believe that powerdown and die-off is the only solution.

But we are far too few to have any effect.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby JasonHam » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 16:47:34

That was a great answer!!!
User avatar
JasonHam
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: I'm a Conspiracy Theorist on Peak Oil in the Media...

Unread postby CrudeAwakening » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 17:02:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', '
')Then there is the largest and best-known group, those limited by the psychology of past investment. No-one who has given years of their life in the service of some cause will willingly recognise its obsolescence. I invested my youth, money and self-esteem in learning about energy and engineering, and derive my income from it, so when this area throws up some new issues, paying attention comes naturally. Had I invested my youth, money and self-esteem (this last bit is particularly important) in learning all about advertising, and derived my income from that, I would be very, very resistant to hearing my work and place in the world described as 'GDP from waste and inefficiency', and hearing that an invisible section of the economy existing at a far lower level of abstraction is going to put me out of business.

You put your finger on it again, Twilight. I have a good friend in advertising who is particularly deaf to the PO issue - I suspect for exactly the reasons you present. But ignoring the issue won't make it go away....
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron