by Guest » Thu 23 Dec 2004, 11:42:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '"')Heroic Iraqi freedom fighters"
"Despicable cowardly terrorists"
Fixed that for you.

Freedom fighters or terrorists?
Two sides of the same coin most of the time. It just depends on which side you're on, and what you believe to be the truth.
However, there is nothing terroristic about attacking military forces, so in this case, I would not call these individuals terrorists. Call them guerillas, militia, paramilitary, whatever. Remember those planes that flew into the towers? That's terrorism. Militaries exist to defend against attacks. Militaries are supposed to expect attacks, so why is it an act of terrorism to attack one? It is not.
Remember those guys cutting off civilians' heads with a steak knife? Now that's terrorism. That's old-school scare tactics right there. Its only intention is to terrorize. I've got no problem calling those guys terrorists. We've got to be careful how we define terrorism. When people attack our military, it pisses me off, too. Call them bastards, MFers, whatever, but let's not misuse the word "terrorist" like the FoxNews people do.