by PenultimateManStanding » Wed 07 Mar 2007, 02:50:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'T')his will also have the effect of criminalizing any store owner whose video system films a robbery committed with a weapon, and any citizen who happens to be an eyewitness to a crime and films it for evidence.
However, when I read the phrase "happy slapping," I nearly threw up. For those who didn't click the link, this refers to thugs attacking random strangers and having their friends film it for amusement.
But there is a way to deal with "happy slapping," and that's to charge both the thug and the accomplice with a conspiracy and a premeditation enhancement, each of which should be good for another five years in the pen, with the proviso that the accomplice who does the filming can get off the hook entirely by turning state's evidence against the perpetrator of the assault & battery. This sets up a clear "prisoner's dilemma" type of situation, by providing a strong incentive for the accomplice to defect on the thug.
The other nasty bit in that article was the item about government certification of websites as approved news sources. All I can say is, if they ever try that in the good ol' USA, there'll be so many instant lawsuits that the entire court system will be tied up for as long as it takes to ovrturn it, and if that doesn't work, then yes, there will be a revolution.
You greatly disappointed me when you failed to respond to my arguments in the psychology thread about forced sterilization.