What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.
by mistel » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 13:24:43
Twilight
The problem in the US and Canada is that we have suburbia which is spread out over huge tracts of land that was all designed around the car. People have to drive. Mass transit is very difficult in these areas of such low density.
I didn't really see it until I went to Florida, after I had started reading about Peak Oil. I think that you don't really notice it in your own neighbourhood. I remember driving through neighbourhoods talking with my wife saying " look at this place, how could you get any where without a car?" I rarely saw bus stops. Unless you level all of suburbia, there is going to have to be some sort of personal transportation. I imagine the problem is not as great in the UK?
Now if you will excuse me, I am going to the RV show. I am looking for a diesel RV that I can run on waste vegetable oil so I can show my kids North America while I still have a chance.
Peter
-

mistel
- Peat

-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
-
by Starvid » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 13:32:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')everal analyses by EPRI or the DOE estimate the energy demand of plug-in hybrids, even at 50% market penetration, at between 4-7% of total US electricity demand.
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/05 ... nal_w.html
On top of this, many power plants are not running 24/7. Read somewhere that a study had shown that PHEV (or was it pure electrics?) could reach a market penetration of about 75 % before new power plants were needed in the US.
And even then it won't be a problem. Power plants are pretty cheap and you don't need that many.
The big cost will always be the cars themselves, and their batteries. A certain premium over fossil cars is OK as the fuel is cheaper, but not that big a premium. A couple of thousand dollars maybe.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
-

Starvid
- Intermediate Crude

-
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden
-
by Twilight » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 15:38:40
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')everal analyses by EPRI or the DOE estimate the energy demand of plug-in hybrids, even at 50% market penetration, at between 4-7% of total US electricity demand.
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/05 ... nal_w.htmlOn top of this, many power plants are not running 24/7. Read somewhere that a study had shown that PHEV (or was it pure electrics?) could reach a market penetration of about 75 % before new power plants were needed in the US.
And even then it won't be a problem. Power plants are pretty cheap and you don't need that many.
The big cost will always be the cars themselves, and their batteries. A certain premium over fossil cars is OK as the fuel is cheaper, but not that big a premium. A couple of thousand dollars maybe.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')uvall noted that a typical battery charger for a plug-in hybrid will draw about 1,400 watts of power from a 120-volt outlet and be active for about 2-8 hours per day—roughly equivalent to an electric space heater.
The 2 hours per day figure is on the very low side, no-one is going to go very far on 2 hours of charge unless the vehicle is made of fibreglass and seats one occupant. If typical usage patterns see a car plugged in for 2 hours, then it will be plugged in for 2 hours at several different times during the day.
I have my doubts about 1.4 kW too, maybe he is looking at Japanese concept cars and not electric conversions of the vehicles Americans like to drive. But I will humour that, and for consistency with my earlier estimate, assume the car is plugged in for 6 hours in a 24-hour period. However, I will assume that in the US, 50% of the cars will be recharged in any given day, as opposed to 30% in the UK. This is conjecture, but it makes sense that not all vehicles will be used daily, and it makes sense to assume that usage will be more frequent in the US than in a European country. So we're talking 51m cars recharged daily assuming 50% market penetration.
This works out as a 71.4 GW load if placed simultaneously. In practice it would be somewhat spread out across the time zones. The
installed capacity in the US is 1067 GW. In comparison, the charging load is small, so in theory it appears feasible, and the 4-7% figure stands up.
In practice, first we have to take 2-3 kW as being more reasonable, then we have to ask three further questions, the same ones we would ask when looking at any other country.
1) How do the typical and peak demand profiles look over the course of a day in each season? How much spare generation capacity exists?
2) How much spare transmission capacity exists?
3) How much non-linear load can the network handle?
Depending on what the answers are, the picture can vary across the country. Regarding the US, anecdotal (and empirical, see 2001, 2003, 2006) evidence points to some areas being unable to sustain electrical vehicle charging loads for extended periods each year. With the infrastructure as it is today, even a few million extra "electric space heaters" being charged during the afternoon would collapse the NE power grid. It is debatable whether thermal derating of power lines during forest fires in places like California, would leave sufficient transmission capacity spare for tens of millions of commuters to plug their cars into the network at the end of a working day.
It has been said before, the US power industry has failed to adequately invest in infrastructure for 30 years, and is now renovating a crumbling network in many places of Third World standard, operating on the brink of disaster as a matter of routine every annual seasonal peak, while centralised European power grids have up until now operated with good supply cushions.
It is true that many power plants do not run all the time, but it was fairly well publicised in 2003 that a couple of hundred gas turbines had been built to deal with exploding demand growth, which then lay unused because there had been no parallel expansion of transmission and distribution infrastructure. You also need some underutilisation of generators and transmission lines, otherwise you are stuck come next servicing downtime, and this is not something you can book with commuters - they will plug in as usual.
With 75% market penetration and real men's electric cars, you've got 150-230 GW of load and proportionately more asset replacement to perform than any European country contemplating the same switch. Power stations will be the least of your problems, every transformer and power line will have to be replaced / uprated, all your control equipment settings changed. If you doubt it, let's imagine what would happen this coming August if everyone on the US East Coast were to run their heating and air conditioning simultaneously. Lights out and lots more smoke pouring out of manholes in New York.
Bottom line: Lots of construction, man. Lots.
The auto companies had better start having discreet consultation with utilities about what they can realistically achieve, I can tell you that out of earshot of the shareholders, it's not a rosy picture.