Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Toyota Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby mistel » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 13:24:43

Twilight

The problem in the US and Canada is that we have suburbia which is spread out over huge tracts of land that was all designed around the car. People have to drive. Mass transit is very difficult in these areas of such low density.

I didn't really see it until I went to Florida, after I had started reading about Peak Oil. I think that you don't really notice it in your own neighbourhood. I remember driving through neighbourhoods talking with my wife saying " look at this place, how could you get any where without a car?" I rarely saw bus stops. Unless you level all of suburbia, there is going to have to be some sort of personal transportation. I imagine the problem is not as great in the UK?

Now if you will excuse me, I am going to the RV show. I am looking for a diesel RV that I can run on waste vegetable oil so I can show my kids North America while I still have a chance.

Peter
User avatar
mistel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Starvid » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 13:32:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')everal analyses by EPRI or the DOE estimate the energy demand of plug-in hybrids, even at 50% market penetration, at between 4-7% of total US electricity demand.

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/05 ... nal_w.html

On top of this, many power plants are not running 24/7. Read somewhere that a study had shown that PHEV (or was it pure electrics?) could reach a market penetration of about 75 % before new power plants were needed in the US.

And even then it won't be a problem. Power plants are pretty cheap and you don't need that many.

The big cost will always be the cars themselves, and their batteries. A certain premium over fossil cars is OK as the fuel is cheaper, but not that big a premium. A couple of thousand dollars maybe.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Twilight » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 15:38:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')everal analyses by EPRI or the DOE estimate the energy demand of plug-in hybrids, even at 50% market penetration, at between 4-7% of total US electricity demand.

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/05 ... nal_w.html

On top of this, many power plants are not running 24/7. Read somewhere that a study had shown that PHEV (or was it pure electrics?) could reach a market penetration of about 75 % before new power plants were needed in the US.

And even then it won't be a problem. Power plants are pretty cheap and you don't need that many.

The big cost will always be the cars themselves, and their batteries. A certain premium over fossil cars is OK as the fuel is cheaper, but not that big a premium. A couple of thousand dollars maybe.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')uvall noted that a typical battery charger for a plug-in hybrid will draw about 1,400 watts of power from a 120-volt outlet and be active for about 2-8 hours per day—roughly equivalent to an electric space heater.


The 2 hours per day figure is on the very low side, no-one is going to go very far on 2 hours of charge unless the vehicle is made of fibreglass and seats one occupant. If typical usage patterns see a car plugged in for 2 hours, then it will be plugged in for 2 hours at several different times during the day.

I have my doubts about 1.4 kW too, maybe he is looking at Japanese concept cars and not electric conversions of the vehicles Americans like to drive. But I will humour that, and for consistency with my earlier estimate, assume the car is plugged in for 6 hours in a 24-hour period. However, I will assume that in the US, 50% of the cars will be recharged in any given day, as opposed to 30% in the UK. This is conjecture, but it makes sense that not all vehicles will be used daily, and it makes sense to assume that usage will be more frequent in the US than in a European country. So we're talking 51m cars recharged daily assuming 50% market penetration.

This works out as a 71.4 GW load if placed simultaneously. In practice it would be somewhat spread out across the time zones. The installed capacity in the US is 1067 GW. In comparison, the charging load is small, so in theory it appears feasible, and the 4-7% figure stands up.

In practice, first we have to take 2-3 kW as being more reasonable, then we have to ask three further questions, the same ones we would ask when looking at any other country.

1) How do the typical and peak demand profiles look over the course of a day in each season? How much spare generation capacity exists?

2) How much spare transmission capacity exists?

3) How much non-linear load can the network handle?

Depending on what the answers are, the picture can vary across the country. Regarding the US, anecdotal (and empirical, see 2001, 2003, 2006) evidence points to some areas being unable to sustain electrical vehicle charging loads for extended periods each year. With the infrastructure as it is today, even a few million extra "electric space heaters" being charged during the afternoon would collapse the NE power grid. It is debatable whether thermal derating of power lines during forest fires in places like California, would leave sufficient transmission capacity spare for tens of millions of commuters to plug their cars into the network at the end of a working day.

It has been said before, the US power industry has failed to adequately invest in infrastructure for 30 years, and is now renovating a crumbling network in many places of Third World standard, operating on the brink of disaster as a matter of routine every annual seasonal peak, while centralised European power grids have up until now operated with good supply cushions.

It is true that many power plants do not run all the time, but it was fairly well publicised in 2003 that a couple of hundred gas turbines had been built to deal with exploding demand growth, which then lay unused because there had been no parallel expansion of transmission and distribution infrastructure. You also need some underutilisation of generators and transmission lines, otherwise you are stuck come next servicing downtime, and this is not something you can book with commuters - they will plug in as usual.

With 75% market penetration and real men's electric cars, you've got 150-230 GW of load and proportionately more asset replacement to perform than any European country contemplating the same switch. Power stations will be the least of your problems, every transformer and power line will have to be replaced / uprated, all your control equipment settings changed. If you doubt it, let's imagine what would happen this coming August if everyone on the US East Coast were to run their heating and air conditioning simultaneously. Lights out and lots more smoke pouring out of manholes in New York.

Bottom line: Lots of construction, man. Lots.

The auto companies had better start having discreet consultation with utilities about what they can realistically achieve, I can tell you that out of earshot of the shareholders, it's not a rosy picture.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 19:58:29

Well, instead of talking about thin Japanese and fat Americans, let me put this into terms fat Americans can understand: the batteries weigh a ton. So, if you take a Prius with a carrying capacity of 850 lbs, and add 500 lbs of batteries, you're left with 350 lbs. Add a 200-250lb driver (this is America!) and you can't carry another adult passenger (most American kids are 150 lbs by the time they're entering high school) or much in the way of stuff, which is the only justification for having a car instead of a bicycle or scooter.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Terrapin » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 20:47:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'W')ell, instead of talking about thin Japanese and fat Americans, let me put this into terms fat Americans can understand: the batteries weigh a ton. So, if you take a Prius with a carrying capacity of 850 lbs, and add 500 lbs of batteries, you're left with 350 lbs. Add a 200-250lb driver (this is America!) and you can't carry another adult passenger (most American kids are 150 lbs by the time they're entering high school) or much in the way of stuff, which is the only justification for having a car instead of a bicycle or scooter.


Actually, why don’t you stop talking about fat Americans and use more realistic numbers?

Since the Prius will obviously have to be redesigned and I don’t see Toyota making it into a 2 seater I would expect it’s load capacity to remain about the same. As you mentioned I would expect it to be several hundred pounds heavier.

As to your previous post, people do not usually run their heating and air conditioning simultaneously, and it will be a helluva long time before we ever reach 75% market share of “real men’s electric cars”, so we have some time to upgrade the infrastructure. By that time there will no doubt be less cars being driven less. The point that the earlier poster made was that with off-peak charging the existing capacity is not as deficient as some make it out to be. The problem of where all the fuel will come from to generate the power still exists however.

BTW, I don’t know what third world countries you’ve been in lately, but it has been my experience that our grid still surpasses most of theirs.

The problems are big enough without getting overly dramatic about them.
User avatar
Terrapin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: NW California
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby TonyPrep » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 21:12:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'T')he point that the earlier poster made was that with off-peak charging the existing capacity is not as deficient as some make it out to be.
Maybe not but, like most "solutions", it requires events to unfold in exactly the right way (like everyone, or almost everyone, sticking religiously to the off-peak charging regime). It's more likely that there is no "solution" and so we need to make very different arrangements for societies.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Terrapin » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 21:38:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'T')he point that the earlier poster made was that with off-peak charging the existing capacity is not as deficient as some make it out to be.
Maybe not but, like most "solutions", it requires events to unfold in exactly the right way (like everyone, or almost everyone, sticking religiously to the off-peak charging regime). It's more likely that there is no "solution" and so we need to make very different arrangements for societies.


I agree that things will have to change. there is no one solution and some of the "fixes" will indeed be painful to many.

I expect we will see even more aggressively priced time of use metering. I would be a fool to deny that the grid will fail sometimes.
User avatar
Terrapin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: NW California
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby sicophiliac » Sun 04 Mar 2007, 22:42:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sicophiliac', 'O')nly thing thats holding them back is the battery technology
So you don't agree with Twilight's post? Or do you just mean that battery technology is holding back car companies from offering them and motorists from buying them?



Well the integrity of the power grid is certianly an issue. If you had 100 million plug ins on the road right now and they all started plugging into the grid tonight, yeah you got big problems. But concievably if they slowly creep into the market place.. maybe growing by a few % a year then that gives you alot more time to gradually improve the power grid. (this obviously ignores the problems well face with crude oil depletion rates but thats another issue) Also the possibiliy of solar power being used more and more on homes and businesses which would be grid free power could help negate the problem.
User avatar
sicophiliac
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: san jose CA
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby gg3 » Mon 05 Mar 2007, 05:26:38

Optimal solutions in most cases are highly syntropic (negentropic; low entropy). The more probable outcomes are lower-syntropy, i.e. higher-entropy, thus more painful for more people.

But not to worry, we're headed for a multi-gigadeath dieoff this century anyway.

---

It would appear the UK is a bit screwed in terms of generating capacity, and the US is a bit screwed in terms of transmission capacity. Both of course can be built, with wind and nuclear and solar and some degree of decentralization.

---

The "Man's Car" is going to turn out to be a horse. Preferably a manly stud of a stallion, with higher prices for horses with larger ...male attributes.

---

Eventually we'll have to deal with energy efficiency of electric cars, perhaps expressed in miles per kilowatt-hour (m/KWH or mpk to parallel the present usage "mpg"). (And/or switch to telecommuting; our friends here from Australia & NZ will appreciate this way of putting it: "From mpg to the PMG":-)

Anyway, in the long term, the bubble cars win.

---

As for personal mobility, first we have to do away with sprawl. Anyone here live in Manhattan? How many people there insist on personal automobiles, eh? Few. A good number don't even have driver's licenses because they don't need them.

In Manhattan, speaking from experience of many a visit there (and hey I was also born there), everyone walks, takes the bus, takes the subways. If you need to go from door to door with a load of stuff you take a taxi. In most neighborhoods you need only walk half a block to the corner to catch a bus or taxi, or another block or two for the subway. Thus walking is actually a viable method of transport there. And a folding bike, for example the new Sinclair A-Bike with the tiny wheels, would work perfectly in that kind of environment.

In New York the grocery is usually right on the corner, and within a short walk of a few blocks there is usually every other store you need.

The problem with Manhattan, aside from the nanny-state local government that has banned smoking in tobacco shops and "bad" fats from restaurant menus (I dread to think what's happened to Mimi's Pizza on Lex, but here in Berkeley we have Arinell's which is every bit as good), is the roof shortage. Roofs are fiendishly expensive, and affordable ones (i.e. middle-class, as in cops & firefighters, shopkeepers & secretaries, etc.) are in the kind of condition (or location) that is reminescent of bad science fiction.

But there is a lesson here, which is that sustainable design is also highly in demand: build cities & towns such that people can walk everywhere, and public transport is ubiquitous, and lo & behold you will get sustainable outcomes and far less need (or even desire) for cars.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Twilight » Mon 05 Mar 2007, 16:23:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'A')s to your previous post, people do not usually run their heating and air conditioning simultaneously, and it will be a helluva long time before we ever reach 75% market share of “real men’s electric cars”, so we have some time to upgrade the infrastructure. By that time there will no doubt be less cars being driven less. The point that the earlier poster made was that with off-peak charging the existing capacity is not as deficient as some make it out to be. The problem of where all the fuel will come from to generate the power still exists however.


I disagree, first of all because charging electric cars does amount to running heating and air conditioning at the same time (the latter are seasonal and as you point out mutually-exclusive loads, but electric cars aren't, which adds up to...), secondly because the last couple of news stories on the subject from New York and Texas point to US transmission and generating capacity in these key centres becoming increasingly deficient rather than improving. Meanwhile, if you believe the hype (I don't, BTW) electric cars are becoming a more realistic prospect. As a load, they have been likened to an electric space heater, and they run year-round, not with the seasons. Therefore they will add to seasonal demand peaks. Domestic loads alone are outpacing expansion of system capacity, and the speed with which the auto manufacturers put SUVs onto the market in the 1990s tells me that if they got behind a product and started pushing, utilities would find themselves completely outclassed.

Incidentally, off-peak charging is an assumption made to give the idea some chance of surviving a feasibility study, first you would have to sell to customers the idea that the car can't be made to recharge outside of a fixed night-time window. That would take some getting used to.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'B')TW, I don’t know what third world countries you’ve been in lately, but it has been my experience that our grid still surpasses most of theirs.

The problems are big enough without getting overly dramatic about them.


Granted, a cheap shot really, I suppose you could take that up with Bill Richardson the former DOE head. But it is far from overly dramatic to take a conclusion (mass ownership of electric cars) and work backwards to assess the necessary conditions. The conditions are more ambitious than utilities' capabilities, and it's not alarmist to say the system would fail in such circumstances, because plainly it would.

Given the standard to which we have become accustomed, if electric cars became viable, everyone would want one and the utilities could not cope with a boom. If an electric car boom were to happen, it would have to follow the world oil decline curve, in other words not for several years. Coincidentally, if industry trends do not change significantly, power system margins will be at their lowest at its start.

It would be a perfect storm, electric utilities which can barely cope with people's lighting, heating, cooling and multiple plasma screens , and the motor industry deciding plug-in electric cars will be their salvation in a post-peak world. And right now neither industry is talking strategy with the other - if nothing else, that would have to change. Otherwise you've got an unannounced shift of demand from a shrinking energy sector onto one completely unprepared.

That's why I think mass ownership of electric cars is hype best left unrealised. But hey, anyone is welcome to grab the next hyped electric car's data sheet, hit the website of their country's energy stat house and come to different conclusions.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Terrapin » Mon 05 Mar 2007, 19:45:52

Twilight, I agree mass ownership of electric cars is fraught with problems, However, we are talking about plug in hybrids here (or at least I thought we were maybe I missed where the topic changed) - their cruising range and charge are not as great as true electrics. They will also still run even if they get no charge.

Where I live “off peak” is considered to be anything other than 12-6pm weekdays. Granted sometimes the California Independent System Operators request that people voluntarily hold off power use in the evenings on hot nights, but (thus far) this has been a rare event. This leaves normally leaves quite a bit of charging time.

I realize that not everyone will abide by the request to charge only off-peak. If this truly becomes an issue I could see the mandating of chips that would only allow hybrids to be charged off-peak.

Of coarse solar electricity is the logical answer to this dilemma. Its peak power generation coincides roughly with peak demand. It decentralizes power generation therefore helping to relieve long distance transmission bottlenecks. It may not be the answer for NYC but it has great potential many other places like Texas.

I think we can all agree that things will change in the future. People will have to get used to whatever the requirements are. I may not be as pessimistic as Monte and some others here but I agree that the days of cheap gasoline and cheap power in general are limited. People will not like it but they will eventually adapt to driving less and more efficiently (possibly on the road to eventually not driving at all).

It seems unfortunate to me that our grid needs to be designed to handle peak loads that only happen for a few hours on a few days per year. It seems to me that at least to some extent things that tends to even out the load (like encouraging off peak use) actually helps improve efficiency.

Maybe people shouldn’t be moving to so many places where so much air conditioning is required?
User avatar
Terrapin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: NW California

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Twilight » Mon 05 Mar 2007, 20:40:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'T')wilight, I agree mass ownership of electric cars is fraught with problems, However, we are talking about plug in hybrids here (or at least I thought we were maybe I missed where the topic changed) - their cruising range and charge are not as great as true electrics. They will also still run even if they get no charge.


True, topic got changed along the way, I wanted to see what would happen with pure electrics, or at some point people deciding gasoline is too pricey and topping up from the socket in their garage as a matter of routine instead.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'W')here I live “off peak” is considered to be anything other than 12-6pm weekdays. Granted sometimes the California Independent System Operators request that people voluntarily hold off power use in the evenings on hot nights, but (thus far) this has been a rare event. This leaves normally leaves quite a bit of charging time.


The problem there is, just how much strain does peak load place on their equipment? Are they running it at short-term thermal ratings during seasonal daily peaks? Do they need that low-load time every night to give it time to cool off ready for the following day? That sort of information will not be released, but it does happen and it is relevant. The problem with spare capacity in a power system is that unless your chosen application was originally taken into account, it is almost always earmarked for something not readily visible, and if an unsatisfactory arrangement is doing the job "well enough", there is a temptation to leave it alone and hope the situation does not change.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') realize that not everyone will abide by the request to charge only off-peak. If this truly becomes an issue I could see the mandating of chips that would only allow hybrids to be charged off-peak.


Yeah, that in itself would be a big culture change, not just for consumers, but for the motor industry, because they will find the likes of public utilities looking over their shoulder, changing the on-demand nature of motoring to fit around the way they do business.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'O')f coarse solar electricity is the logical answer to this dilemma. Its peak power generation coincides roughly with peak demand. It decentralizes power generation therefore helping to relieve long distance transmission bottlenecks. It may not be the answer for NYC but it has great potential many other places like Texas.

I think we can all agree that things will change in the future. People will have to get used to whatever the requirements are. I may not be as pessimistic as Monte and some others here but I agree that the days of cheap gasoline and cheap power in general are limited. People will not like it but they will eventually adapt to driving less and more efficiently (possibly on the road to eventually not driving at all).


A way of charging electric cars off-grid would simplify the engineering problem. Not just the obvious peak load handling issue, but the effect switched mode power supplies have on power quality and equipment further up the network. In parts of the world sufficiently sunny and wealthy, PV could fill that gap nicely. A few opportunities open up if PV can be made cheap enough, and in large volumes.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I')t seems unfortunate to me that our grid needs to be designed to handle peak loads that only happen for a few hours on a few days per year. It seems to me that at least to some extent things that tends to even out the load (like encouraging off peak use) actually helps improve efficiency.

Maybe people shouldn’t be moving to so many places where so much air conditioning is required?

It is seldom required anywhere, but people want it. I read a news snippet last week about some argument over whether or not a school in (I think) Australia was going to have air conditioning, as temperatures would hit maximums of 27 deg C during term time. Some idiot was saying the needs of the kids must come first. He didn't realise that acclimatisation to luxury while burning coal, loading the network to capacity and stifling the potential of electric vehicles would do greater harm in the long run. I can understand the need for air conditioning in climates where temperatures regularly reach 40-55 deg C, where internal organs can actually start to cook, but not in countries like the US. It has been fitted as standard for years, yet in Europe it is an optional extra which you have to sort out yourself. We really need to distinguish between necessities, like figuring out a better way of making the journey to work that puts food on the table, and comforts not really necessary to life, like running air conditioning all evening and night.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Terrapin » Mon 05 Mar 2007, 21:46:56

All more or less true. I will coment on this however:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'A') way of charging electric cars off-grid would simplify the engineering problem.
I had once thought this was a good idea (charging cars off-grid) but I am not as keen on it any more. I figure that if you are going to set up PVs they should optimally have a place to send their generated electricity at all times. If they are set up for the sole purpose of charging batteries, particularly car batteries there will likely be times when either the car is not home or the batteries are topped off. For this reason it seems to me that PVs should be linked to the grid whenever possible. If people want to further link their car batteries to the grid and sell off peak power back to the grid at peak rates then so be it (someone else alluded to this a page back or so). $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ot just the obvious peak load handling issue, but the effect switched mode power supplies have on power quality and equipment further up the network.

I am not familiar with what you refer to here. Are you saying that there is a problem to the grid with the introduction of modified sine waves from an inverter?
User avatar
Terrapin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: NW California
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby TonyPrep » Mon 05 Mar 2007, 22:54:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') may not be as pessimistic as Monte and some others here but I agree that the days of cheap gasoline and cheap power in general are limited. People will not like it but they will eventually adapt to driving less and more efficiently (possibly on the road to eventually not driving at all).
I know you realise that big changes are coming but this kind of comment makes me despair. Driving less or more efficiently isn't going to be enough, long term. We either decide that we can't do without economic growth and accept that eventual collapse is inevitable, or we aim for sustainability which means a very, very, different society, economy and way of life. Sustainability doesn't mean just driving less or more economically, it may well mean not driving at all. That's why tinkering with plug in hybrids and electric cars is just that, tinkering; it doesn't address the real problems at all.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Terrapin » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 10:46:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') may not be as pessimistic as Monte and some others here but I agree that the days of cheap gasoline and cheap power in general are limited. People will not like it but they will eventually adapt to driving less and more efficiently (possibly on the road to eventually not driving at all).
I know you realise that big changes are coming but this kind of comment makes me despair. Driving less or more efficiently isn't going to be enough, long term. We either decide that we can't do without economic growth and accept that eventual collapse is inevitable, or we aim for sustainability which means a very, very, different society, economy and way of life. Sustainability doesn't mean just driving less or more economically, it may well mean not driving at all. That's why tinkering with plug in hybrids and electric cars is just that, tinkering; it doesn't address the real problems at all.


Tony, I despair also.

We are not going to wake up tomorrow with everyone saying “I think I’ll live sustainable from now on”, so the pragmatic side of me says let’s move that one off the table and see what is left. The best conceivable scenario that I can envision is having as many technologies in place to ease transitions into a more sustainable lifestyle as people become aware of the need. This combined with a slowing down of the economies and a decline and eventual reversal in population growth will do a lot and will likely be seen soon with population decline very possible by mid century. Now is the time for R&D in these technologies while capital is still relatively available. This is not the same as rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. This is more like an orderly flow of launching the lifeboats. The more time we buy the easier the transition will be. I am not saying it will be easy. It could well be that “driving” does disappear completely but it is not going to happen this decade so let’s help folks make the transition to it rather than trying to do something impossible.
User avatar
Terrapin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: NW California
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby TonyPrep » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 17:10:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'T')he more time we buy the easier the transition will be.
That is only true if we buy time as part of a strategy of transition to real sustainability. I actually don't think it is at all useful to do the odd thing that we can sell as more sustainable, if there is no strategy to get to sustainability. So we'll hear of a hundred initiatives that are intended (fingers crossed) to reduce CO2 emissions, whilst we continue to grow the population, erode topsoil, use more non-ff resources, push for more economic growth, reduce biodiversity, run down aquifers, and so on, as well as to continue to rely on fossil fuels, even if only at a reduced rate (which still depletes those resources).

Just think about what it means to only use renewable resources below their renewal rate and to continuously decrease our use of non-renewables towards zero. I believe that it will mean a society/economy utterly different from our present one.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Twilight » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 17:43:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') am not familiar with what you refer to here. Are you saying that there is a problem to the grid with the introduction of modified sine waves from an inverter?

Yeah, transformers are quite sensitive to harmonics and have to be derated to avoid overheating as a result of increased losses. I have heard anecdotal tales of this being a particular problem in modern hospitals, lots of fancy power electronics and the transformers feeding them can become damaged, have lifespans reduced, etc unless they are over-specified or some sort of filtering is implemented. That tends to be a special case, but electric car battery charging before reaching mass-market conditions would have to be very carefully considered with utilities in mind.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Terrapin » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 17:47:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'T')he more time we buy the easier the transition will be.
That is only true if we buy time as part of a strategy of transition to real sustainability. I actually don't think it is at all useful to do the odd thing that we can sell as more sustainable, if there is no strategy to get to sustainability. So we'll hear of a hundred initiatives that are intended (fingers crossed) to reduce CO2 emissions, whilst we continue to grow the population, erode topsoil, use more non-ff resources, push for more economic growth, reduce biodiversity, run down aquifers, and so on, as well as to continue to rely on fossil fuels, even if only at a reduced rate (which still depletes those resources).

Just think about what it means to only use renewable resources below their renewal rate and to continuously decrease our use of non-renewables towards zero. I believe that it will mean a society/economy utterly different from our present one.


Considering that I don't believe any of us that post here live a truly sustainable lifestyle it doesn't look good does it?

OTOH Humans have proven to be remarkably adaptable in the past and “technology” is not completely played out yet I believe there is still hope.

Personally I believe we have to play the cards as they are dealt. A large terrorist attack in S.A. could change everything in a flash (maybe for the better). Maybe there is a viable cellulose-ethanol process. Maybe Lovins is closer to right than we give him credit for. Maybe someone can come up with a fuel cell that converts ethanol directly. Maybe a cheap PV system with 40% efficiency will be developed.

I know I know I can hear he doomers say “It won’t make any difference, we will just expand to exploit whatever new resources are found and then we will be worse off than before.” I’m not so sure about that I believe that further energy breakthroughs will be incremental instead of the blockbusters like coal and oil. They will not be a cheap and they will only help alleviate the pain on the downside. People will respect them more because they will cost more.

What do you propose Tony?
User avatar
Terrapin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: NW California
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby TonyPrep » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 17:59:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'W')hat do you propose Tony?
Well, I'm only one person and have no more insight into the future than others. What I'm convinced of is that we first of all need our leaders to recognize the limits of this planet and then to start a massive education campaign to get that fact into the general consciousness. Only then can we start to contemplate the massive societal changes that would be required for sustainability. What those changes will be, I can only guess at. There needs to be a lot of research, open debate and cross-party consensus.

Again, what is the alternative to sustainability? It can only be collapse.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Unread postby Terrapin » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 18:16:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') am not familiar with what you refer to here. Are you saying that there is a problem to the grid with the introduction of modified sine waves from an inverter?

Yeah, transformers are quite sensitive to harmonics and have to be derated to avoid overheating as a result of increased losses. I have heard anecdotal tales of this being a particular problem in modern hospitals, lots of fancy power electronics and the transformers feeding them can become damaged, have lifespans reduced, etc unless they are over-specified or some sort of filtering is implemented. That tends to be a special case, but electric car battery charging before reaching mass-market conditions would have to be very carefully considered with utilities in mind.

Interesting, I had not heard that. I know that the last hospital I used to work in had dedicated “monitor” circuits for fancy electronics. I had been told that those circuits were extra “clean” without surges and spikes. (Maybe that was also to reduce appliance induced harmonics?).

I wonder how big a problem it is?
User avatar
Terrapin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: NW California
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron