Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Barbarian invasions

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Barbarian invasions

Unread postby TheDude » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 20:03:00

I'm reading The Fall of Rome and the End of Civilisation by Bryan Ward-Perkins, which debunks the theory (popular in the last few decades) that the "Fall of Rome" was a sort of gradual transition, with relatively peaceful integration of the various invading Goths, Huns, Vandals. Hmm, all of those terms are perjoratives in modern usage...
Anyway, I keep thinking about where invaders would come from in North America. Here in the Willamette Valley, would we be overrun with Idahoans? We're already being invaded by Californians. What kind of divisions between people would manifest themselves over time? Such as the Rhine dividing the French and Germans. Would the Columbia River create a similiar division between Oregon and Washington?
Suggested purely as an entertaining thought excercise.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 20:31:32

OK, the new barbarians at the gate are the children. They will go ballistic when they see the world collapsing for lack of energy. If you are armed and ready, be prepared to fire on 13 year olds.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby Loki » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 21:29:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'A')nyway, I keep thinking about where invaders would come from in North America.

Gee, I don't know. Could it possibly be Mexico? Do I win a prize for coming up with the most blatantly obvious answer?

Ten percent of Mexico's citizens already live here in the US, and it sure doesn't seem like the flood is gonna be stopped anytime soon. My aunt and uncle's former neighborhood in Salem is now predominantly Mexican. When I lived there 15 years ago there wasn't a Mexican to be seen anywhere. Ever been to Hillsburrito? Or Woodburn? More than 50% of Woodburn's population is now "Hispanic" (i.e., Mexican).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ccording to a Pew Hispanic Center survey in 2005, nearly half of Mexico's 106 million people say they want to move to the United States, and many of them say they're willing to cross our borders illegally to do so. Pew found 46 percent would go to live in the United States if they had the means and opportunity. Of those, 21 percent, or more than 20 million people, say they would be inclined to cross the border illegally.

Link


As for which divisions will be exacerbated by the end of the Great Barbeque, the same divisions that have divided people for ages: Race, culture, and, to a lesser extent, class. "Multiculturalism" is for societies that are fat and happy.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby Loki » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 21:41:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he current migration of Mexicans and Central Americans to the United States is one of the largest diasporas in modern history, experts say.

Roughly 10 percent of Mexico's population of about 107 million is now living in the United States, estimates show. About 15 percent of Mexico's labor force is working in the United States. One in every 7 Mexican workers migrates to the United States.

Mass migration from Mexico began more than a century ago. It is deeply embedded in the history, culture and economies of both nations. The current wave began with Mexico's economic crisis in 1982, accelerated sharply in the 1990s with the U.S. economic boom, and today has reached record dimensions.

San Francisco Chronicle
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby Daculling » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 21:59:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'G')ee, I don't know. Could it possibly be Mexico?


They are coming from everywhere... depending on where you live. Central Americans where I'm at (Maryland). I even saw an influx of Eastern Europeans during the immigration debates last summer, but they left when amnesty croaked...

The real question is... who controls the borders. Is it the globalists that wish for a North American Union? If yes then we are all in for a shit storm.

Will patriots prevail? Then you will see a Nazi type cleanup of our immigration problems. But only when the people start to suffer. Do you want to suffer? Welcome to the EndGame.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby Daculling » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 22:14:27

Question directed to anyone with the know. Did the Romans intend to restrict movement of (ethnic) peoples or try to dominate (ethnic) peoples with their culture?

These are two different strategies... none of which are employed currently by western governments.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby Loki » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 22:16:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daculling', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'G')ee, I don't know. Could it possibly be Mexico?


They are coming from everywhere... depending on where you live. Central Americans where I'm at (Maryland).

True enough. I have a pretty Western-centric view---I'm not that up on what the situation is like on the East Coast. TheDude also asked about the Willamette Valley, which I'm most familiar with, having lived here half my life. There has been a major influx of Mexicans here in the last 10-15 years. And a lot of farmers are whining that we still don't have enough....

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he real question is... who controls the borders. Is it the globalists that wish for a North American Union? If yes then we are all in for a shit storm.

I'm not sure I buy into the North American Union stuff. I don't doubt there are some members of the ruling class who support it, but I think the continued influx of illegals is due to corporate greed and the unwillingness of politricksters to upset their owners rather than a conspiracy to destroy US sovereignty. Truly an unholy alliance---the corporate ruling class, the bought-and-paid-for politicians, and the white-guilt PC liberals who rationalize the Invasion as something great for this country.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon
Top

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby gg3 » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 23:23:19

Let's not forget the criminal gangs that are already in our midst, and that represent every conceivable ethnicity & nationality. And not just in the urban areas: very often in the rural areas as well. And very often fueled by the meth trade. And very often quite well armed.

My advice: Support the lawful order with all you've got. When public funding gets tight and services are being cut to the bone, volunteer to wash police cars or sweep up at the county courthouse or bring fresh vegetables to inmates at the county lockup. When it gets even tighter, host bake sales to keep the county judge on the job, and organize neighborhood watches. As long as the framework of criminal and civil justice holds, there will be a way to keep the barbarians in check. But if that framework breaks, it's a long fast trip to the bottom and you do not want to go there.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 20 Feb 2007, 23:56:05

There's already a sort of loose neighborhood watch forming on my street in response to the new neighbors I got about a month ago.....

I have on my shopping list a good gun, if we get a real disaster like earthquake etc the police are going to be spread thin and shooting my neighbors will be a move commended by the whole neighborhood - and the cops!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby max_power29 » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 03:33:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', '
')My advice: Support the lawful order with all you've got. When public funding gets tight and services are being cut to the bone, volunteer to wash police cars or sweep up at the county courthouse or bring fresh vegetables to inmates at the county lockup. When it gets even tighter, host bake sales to keep the county judge on the job, and organize neighborhood watches. As long as the framework of criminal and civil justice holds, there will be a way to keep the barbarians in check. But if that framework breaks, it's a long fast trip to the bottom and you do not want to go there.


I [s]think[/s] know it will actually be easier to deal with crime once the "law and order" is bankrupt and gone. Good riddance to our corrupt "justice system" . The justice system is for the rich only. The biggest gang, which is a protection racket, there is dresses in blue clothes and drive around in black and white vehicles extorting money and property from the people at the points of their guns.

The law comes down hard on the people for eliminating the criminal element and stopping illegal immigration; especially in places like commiefornia. what's hilarious now is the government is even lashing out at their own enFORCEment arms. HA HA HA!

Gangs are thought of as ruling the streets only because the people are not allowed to deal with them. If open season were declared on gangs, they would be gonners. Compared to law abiding, serious, gun owners they cant shoot worth crap. They don't even know how to hold firearms properly.

Regular Joes with hunting rifles and revolvers could gun them down like fish in a barrel.
User avatar
max_power29
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Orygun
Top

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby katkinkate » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 06:22:16

I think, in the future, both Canada, USA and Australia are likely to get a Chinese invasion. Either when the environmental degradation in China gets too much for them to support their own population, or when the western economy crashes opening the way for a migration.
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby max_power29 » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 06:55:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('katkinkate', 'I') think, in the future, both Canada, USA and Australia are likely to get a Chinese invasion. Either when the environmental degradation in China gets too much for them to support their own population, or when the western economy crashes opening the way for a migration.


This is one of the only scenarios in which I would support the use of nukes. It would be the only chance of survival. I suspect nukes are the reason china has not gone after Russia's vast natural resources/wide open spaces yet.

Anyways the chinese better hurry up if they want americas resources. The Mexicans are beating them hands down. The Chinese could probably buy everything in america without firing a shot and I bet they would solve the illegal mexican immigration problem quickly and easily.
Iran: 'Murrica's FINAL frontier
User avatar
max_power29
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Orygun
Top

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby FourOfSwords » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 10:41:50

TheDude, this is an interesting thread. Although ' suggested purely as an entertaining thought exercise' , it is important to discuss on some level, as a loose generalization of what the USA faces today, and likely on into the near future.
Although I have not read the particular book you are reading now, I am fairly well read on this subject. Although from here on in all we can discuss here are loose generalizations and comparisons.
My understanding is that most of the 'fall' was gradual with the Empire becoming more Germanized over the centuries, with the
exception of the barbarian tribes you mentioned, who initially did not integrate well at all, and the Huns(who were not Germanic), who were there not to integrate at all!( modern parallels to be draw about your 'friends' south of the border).
Before we go on, I really want to state that we should be careful
to try not to cross the line from cogent dialogue into xenophobia and racism. There are I assume, a few individuals here on this forum that are from ancestry that we may be discussing, and just out of common courtesy we should be aware that our musing here may offend.
The kind of divisions between people likely will not form along river lines, or geographical area's, but more along lines of urban/rural settings. We see this now as a process that has been going on for decades, where new immigrants especially those from the south migrate to large urban areas. So too with the barbarians in Roman times. People go where the money is, and a living can be made.
Athough for one part of the US's southern border the Rio Grande river would provide a brrier(if properly manned) that the Romans tried to provide with their 'Limes'
Loki, you are right of course. South of the border, is where the new 'barbarians are massing. And you only win a prize if you can convince America that this is a real threat that is shattering and morphing it's culture. You win the grand prize if you can convince the powers that be to acknowledge this, and effectively stop it. Of course we know this will never happen. Without the converging crises of ecological collapse and peak oil, America is already an empire in steep decline(can be friendly debated on another thread if someone wishes)
Daculling, really good questions, and relevant to America today. I feel that early on in the Roman Empire, certain Emperors and their beaurocrats, and provincial governors who were 'in line' with official policy did try to restrict ethnic movement. This would have been done in the border provinces. Keep in mind though, that their borders were to a large extent militarized. In the interior provinces there was less of a need. Later on as barbarian peoples pressed far more firmly on this 'crustal defensive line'(the 'limes') it was realized that restriction, or even deflection of these migrations was unlikely to suceed to any great extent.
Coupled with this was a severe (and sometimes only local ) depopulation of the empire due to various reasons, but mainly to constant losses in the almost endless wars that plagued the later empire, coupled with some really nasty plagues that swept through at various times. So how is this relevant to America, and her declining empire? Similar, but not identical problems. We are seeing(I believe) the beginning of what may be a series of endless wars coming up. America's population is not being decimated by these wars, but since there is as yet no enforced draft, the effect is the same for this empires army. Oh, and as an interesting side note the US is starting to do what the Middle to Late Roman Empire army did...recruiting foreign nations into the amy to fight it's wars. The Romans were experts at this. It started out as hiring into the army individuals from Germanic and other tribes, and snowballed into hiring whole tribes then whole nations/peoples to fight, with a promise of citizenship after service. The US is doing the same today, with a promise of 'fast track' citizenship. people should be woried about this.
As to trying to dominate other peoples with their culture Daculling, the Romans were experts at this. Offering the 'Pax Romana' and ctizenship were standard operating procedure. So too with the US. Today is offered the 'Pax Americana', iPods, Big Mac's and slammed down Honda's etc. It's been done for decades, and except for a small percentage of the population no one is aware of it.
Katkinkate, I feel you are spot on when you mention the Asian migration tidal wave that is hitting North America's shores. It started shortly after WWII and has grown into quite a surge recently. The powers that be are aware of this and actively promote it. Most if not all Western nations that are highly indusrialized are experiencing a population shrikage or a best a net zero loss. If you are a consumer/capitalist driven nation your economy must continually grow or it with sputter, slow down, and eventually collapse. This is well known. Well known by the govt, well known by big business/multinational corporations(whose allegience is to no country, people, or Empire).
As for barbarian invasions, well, its happen, its here for those who take time from their lives to look up and ponder important matters.
I might suggest for those who are interested to obviously read Gibbon's Decline and Fall if you have not already. The parallels with the Roman Empire are there, they are just of a different scope and magnatude.
It gives one thought to ponder. :(
A.
User avatar
FourOfSwords
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Sun 05 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: East edge of the Milky Way

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby Baldwin » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 13:18:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') might suggest for those who are interested to obviously read Gibbon's Decline and Fall if you have not already. The parallels with the Roman Empire are there, they are just of a different scope and magnatude.


Gibbon's views were in someways backwards and a product of his own times. It's best not to heed his words when discussing the Byzantine Empire. In fact, his commentary on the Roman Empire should be taken with a grain of salt, as he excessively lavishes the triumphs of the Empire (particularly the Pax Romana) .
User avatar
Baldwin
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon 05 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby AWPrime » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 13:20:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'T')here's already a sort of loose neighborhood watch forming on my street in response to the new neighbors I got about a month ago.....

I have on my shopping list a good gun, if we get a real disaster like earthquake etc the police are going to be spread thin and shooting my neighbors will be a move commended by the whole neighborhood - and the cops!

What kind of neighbors are they?
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby Baldwin » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 13:35:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('max_power29', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', '
')My advice: Support the lawful order with all you've got. When public funding gets tight and services are being cut to the bone, volunteer to wash police cars or sweep up at the county courthouse or bring fresh vegetables to inmates at the county lockup. When it gets even tighter, host bake sales to keep the county judge on the job, and organize neighborhood watches. As long as the framework of criminal and civil justice holds, there will be a way to keep the barbarians in check. But if that framework breaks, it's a long fast trip to the bottom and you do not want to go there.


I [s]think[/s] know it will actually be easier to deal with crime once the "law and order" is bankrupt and gone. Good riddance to our corrupt "justice system" . The justice system is for the rich only. The biggest gang, which is a protection racket, there is dresses in blue clothes and drive around in black and white vehicles extorting money and property from the people at the points of their guns.

The law comes down hard on the people for eliminating the criminal element and stopping illegal immigration; especially in places like commiefornia. what's hilarious now is the government is even lashing out at their own enFORCEment arms. HA HA HA!

Gangs are thought of as ruling the streets only because the people are not allowed to deal with them. If open season were declared on gangs, they would be gonners. Compared to law abiding, serious, gun owners they cant shoot worth crap. They don't even know how to hold firearms properly.

Regular Joes with hunting rifles and revolvers could gun them down like fish in a barrel.


In a way I wish for this to happen. Citizens with guns can make a living providing protection, or just simply can protect themselves without the hassle of going through the legal process to justify shooting that guy who broke in.
User avatar
Baldwin
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon 05 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby TheDude » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 15:45:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'E')ver been to Hillsburrito?


Of course. And Beaverton, which also has had its name modified into a racial slur. Here in Newberg there are about 6 Mexican restaurants - about even with your various Anglo diners. Plus Tacos Time and Bell. Someday they'll catch up with the churches! More of them per capita than anywhere else in the state.
"Barbarian" to a Roman simply ment outsider, which Mexicans definitely are to native born Americans. Typing that, I sound like Daniel Day-Lewis in Gangs of New York. This definitely won't settle itself peacefully - ghettos, pogroms, sharecropping, feudalistic arrangements, slavery? With the lights out who knows how the law will come down on people.
With things as disconnected from reality as they are in the US now I wonder how large a city could maintain itself without electricity or trucks shipping in food. In Roman times the countryside was full of farmers who of course didn't use artificial fertilizers or gas-powered tractors. The cities could turn to them when needed - will that be the case in the future?
I was originally wondering how the geography of the US might play a part in shaping future nations. Without cars, trucks, and trains, I wouldn't expect much more immigration here from Mexico. It would be comporable to the divide between Constantinople and India - trade to be had for sure but no en masse migration I'd bet.
Kunstler brought up the idea of Asian piracy against North America. Dunno if the currents would be in their favor or the
distances worth surmounting. The Middle East will eventually go to the Chinese or Russians though - I doubt we can maintain these supply lines much longer. With powered ships and America in the dark they could do as they please, at least until the Natives start picking 'em off.
I'm about half-way through Ward-Perkins's book, which has that dry British humour in spots; very engaging read. He's drawing on what archaelogical evidence has come through to us, which so far in the book means mostly pots and coins. Romans seem to have forgotten what a potter's wheel was for about 400 years there. Nothing was distributed like it'd been before - he mentions shards of Roman manafacture showing up in north Scotland, for instance. At one Italian spot second and third century fragments are to be had for cheap now, but something from the sixth century or later is very valuable - owing to its rarity.
There's the Mons Testaceus in Rome, a hill formed from discarded amphorae - wine/oil jugs. Pollution levels from lead/copper smelting peaked when the empire was going strong, and only reached comparable levels in the 16th/17th centuries - these two bits of data Ward-Perkins includes as examples of civilization's more dubious achievements...
His theme is that levels of "comfort" for people in general declined, along with commonly-available goods and their quality/quantity. We can infer a similiar decline in goods that don't make it into the archaelogical record - clothing, structures, etc.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby smiley » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 18:40:56

I have to admit that I haven't read the book by Bryan Ward-Perkins yet. But glancing over the contents of his book I get the impression that he is a proponent of a certain view which I don't share.

The problem is that when you rely on too many Roman sources you get a certain impression of the roman empire and of those 'barbarians'. One which is not necessarily correct.

I mean suppose that you would dig up the combined Hollywood archives in 2000 years. How realistic would your view be about present day America be? How much correct historical information would you be able to extract from films like The Patriot, Once upon a time in the West, Pearl Harbor, or worse, say would try to understand America's role in the Afghan conflict by watching Rambo III.

The Roman empire was vast and extremely powerful. It was also very paranoid, extremely conservative, brutal and abusive.

Roman sources like De Bello Gallico will tell you that the romans went to submit the barbarians (a term which referred to all non Latin speakers, including the technologically advanced Greec and Persians) to bring them civilization. The reality is that they stripped the countries of all their recourses, destroyed their cultural treasures and enslaved their population.

The Romans also were not too big into science unless it could be brought to military purposes. In fact science was seen as a threat to their military superiority, especially when it was practiced in the outer regions. No wonder Archimedes was killed by the Romans.

In a lot of literature (I don't know if this is one of them) the barbarians are portrayed as an ignorant, inferior and culturally backward bunch, who didn't want to become civilized and for some odd reason (envy) set out to destroy the roman empire.

In fact they might well have been relatively advanced people who saw their chance to get rid of the big bully and collectively set out to do so.

And there there are a lot of parallels to draw with the present day.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 18:53:12

Barbarians lol!!

Let's see, "mexicans", tend to live in coherent families, Mom stays home and takes care of the kids, Dad goes out and works, Friday night he gets together with his buddies and they sit out on their trucks in the parking lot and drink a lil tequila and howl like coyotes, but it's up early Saturday morning to take the kids to the park, and Sunday's church.

Their equivalents in white America: Mom and dad like as not divorced, if not they might as well be because they're both working fulltime or more than fulltime. The kids are latchkey, left with sitters or daycare, etc. They may or may not go to church, if they do better than even chance it's some looney one talking about the End Times. The kids are kicked out to sink or swim at 18. They got their tattoos and that's their life preparation!

I wonder if the Romans were as fucked up as we are, when the various European tribes came in, maybe dressed oddly and smelling different, but chances are they had a much more "human" social structure and family structure.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Barbarian invasions

Unread postby Loki » Wed 21 Feb 2007, 19:27:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'B')arbarians lol!!

Let's see, "mexicans", tend to live in coherent families, Mom stays home and takes care of the kids, Dad goes out and works, Friday night he gets together with his buddies and they sit out on their trucks in the parking lot and drink a lil tequila and howl like coyotes, but it's up early Saturday morning to take the kids to the park, and Sunday's church.

That's a pretty rosy picture you're painting there Picasso. You forgot to mention the hordes of single men hanging on the corners, the meth dealers, the gang bangers, the wife beaters, the murderers, the drunk drivers, the general lack of concern about education, etc., etc., etc.

I don't consider Mexicans to be "barbarians," matter of fact, I think there are some admirable traits to their culture, but they're hardly all angelic family-loving churchgoers. I grew up 40 miles from the border and had many Mexican friends and acquaintances, and I used to speak decent Spanish. Their culture has its good points and its bad points, same as ours. But the fact of the matter is that they're illegally pouring over our borders by the millions. This is a problem.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron