by JPL » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 20:59:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')
We get one shot at this.
Monte - no, we HAD one shot, and we blew it 150 years ago.
Let's do a mental exercise here - imagine a world which had never had Oil. We would have now:
A world which would (in N America and Europe) look a bit more advenced than the 19'th century but which would still use mule and horse-power on the roads, and sail and coal for most of its sea-transport. The rail-road would be the main form of transport on land and there would be the odd steam-car for the rich.
Helium-zeppelins would be used for luxury air travel and the odd bit of air-freight for those that could afford it.
The 'Green Revolution' would never have happened and the world population would now be stable at (about?) 3 billion.
The Third World would still be in a mess but we would (sic) be working on the problem.
Climate Change would be an issue but a 'very slow' one - given our limited ability to extract coal in any large quantity and the fact that the cost of transportation would be so high, we could only us it locally, anyhow.
We would have worked very hard on technologies to capture 'latent' energy and may well have built a lot of local, village-based electric-power systems based around sustainable woodland and Steam-Powered electric stations to burn the wood. Some of the visionaries amongst us might, even now, be talking - excitedly - about linking some of them up to form a 'Grid'.
######
(& now back to reality...)
We have 20 years(max) to reverse 200 years of history and then crawl up the 'right' time-line instead (pluugh...)
What I mean is, we could have been 'civilised' without mass-industrialisation. It didn't have to be this way...
JPL