Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Doomer or PowerDowner?

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

I am a....

Doomer
27
No votes
PowerDowner
28
No votes
Cornucopian
2
No votes
In between Doomer and Powerdowner
49
No votes
In between Powerdowner and Cornucopian
10
No votes
'huh, what?' / none of the above
2
No votes
 
Total votes : 118

Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Bas » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 07:14:19

Thought it would be intersting to find the ratio between doomers powerdowners on this forum.

Let's say that a:

Doomer = somebody who believes in the almost total collapse of societies, countries with massive die-offs around the world, resource wars the size of a World War, with nukes. Basically armageddon.

PowerDowner = Somebody who thinks that we will face prolonged econonomic depression, some resource wars but contained, some die-off but mainly in third world countries. Societies and countries will remain mostly intact, biofuels and sustainable energy will play a role in a new economic equilibrium.

Cornucopian = Does not believe in the end of abundant oil/thinks technology will save the day.
Last edited by Bas on Fri 02 Feb 2007, 12:52:39, edited 1 time in total.
Bas
 

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby davep » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 07:18:46

I'm choosing the Doomer / Powerdowner combo, but I guess both will occur to a greater or lesser extent depending on geography.

I don't think that you need to believe that nukes will be let loose to be considered a doomer. This depends more on who has access to the nukes, and is not a direct result of PO.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Bas » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 07:25:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', 'I')'m choosing the Doomer / Powerdowner combo, but I guess both will occur to a greater or lesser extent depending on geography.


People that know me know that I'm stubbornly powerdowner, some even despise me for it, but it won't change, you have to have something to believe in even if you don't know if that's how things will go.
Bas
 

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby NeoPeasant » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 10:39:44

Thanks for making the distinction between doomer and power-downer. To a cornucopian, any future other than one permitting a life of high consumption and universal automobility is doom, and anyone predicting such a future is a doomer.
The battle to preserve our lifestyle has already been lost. The battle to preserve our lives is just beginning.
NeoPeasant
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Bas » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 13:51:40

interesting results so far, I thought the people here were more doomer than that...maybe they just shout more [smilie=eusa_think.gif]
Bas
 

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby undertaker » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 15:38:18

I'm making a speech next weekend advocating powerdown. Not sure the reception I'll et, or more importantly, if people will actually act on what I say. I will lay out what they can do, and I have discovered and cultivated a lot of local resources (mostly farmers and farm related industries that are approachable).

If I don't get good results, count me in as a strict doomer.
User avatar
undertaker
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun 08 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Bas » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 15:56:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('undertaker', '
')If I don't get good results, count me in as a strict doomer.


Says the undertaker, L [smilie=laughing6.gif] L
Bas
 

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby turmoil » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 16:05:04

Just drive less, and eat less meat...it's not that hard for people to do and when prices get high, people will do that anyway.

So much energy is wasted and I have no doubt that when people become aware of this, we will all be powerdowners by 2020, if not sooner.

What's the difference between a powerdowner and an environmentalist? Historical baggage?
Last edited by turmoil on Fri 02 Feb 2007, 19:47:17, edited 1 time in total.
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 18:04:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', ' ')
PowerDowner = Somebody who thinks that we will face prolonged econonomic depression, some resource wars but contained, some die-off but mainly in third world countries. Societies and countries will remain mostly intact, biofuels and sustainable energy will play a role in a new economic equilibrium.



Not even close. A PowerDowner believes we must downscale every aspect of our lives, restrict per capita consumption, and reduce the population from it's current level. We should develop sustainable energies that do not exceed the earth's capacity to prodcue or absorb.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Tanada » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 19:34:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', ' ')
PowerDowner = Somebody who thinks that we will face prolonged econonomic depression, some resource wars but contained, some die-off but mainly in third world countries. Societies and countries will remain mostly intact, biofuels and sustainable energy will play a role in a new economic equilibrium.



Not even close. A PowerDowner believes we must downscale every aspect of our lives, restrict per capita consumption, and reduce the population from it's current level. We should develop sustainable energies that do not exceed the earth's capacity to prodcue or absorb.


Hmm, Monty, his version is a lot closer to what I mean when I say powerdowner than your is. Perhaps you can do a seperate poll with your defenitions? Might be instructive.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 20:25:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', ' ')Hmm, Monty, his version is a lot closer to what I mean when I say powerdowner than your is. Perhaps you can do a seperate poll with your defenitions? Might be instructive.


Well, Richard Heinberg is know for his stand on Powerdown.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heinberg', 'P')owerdown — The path of cooperation, conservation, and sharing. The only realistic alternative to resource competition is a strategy that will require tremendous effort and
economic sacrifice in order to reduce per-capita resource
usage in wealthy countries, develop alternative energy
sources, distribute resources more equitably, and humanely
but systematically reduce the size of the human population
over time.


This is what a powerdown means, regardless of what others might say it is.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby EnergySpin » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 20:31:24

There are a few other distinctions that have to be made ...
For example how would you classify Amory Lovins Bas?
He clearly believes that the amount of energy we use has to come down, but the services we get from energy do not have to.
I for example believe that the amount of services enjoyed, can in fact increase to a great extent by technological innovations/evolution/adoption of existing stuff in a grand scale but do see the reduction in energy consumption per capita as inevitable (and even desirable considering GCC).
I guess I have tovote for something between a cornocupian and a powerdowner
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Bas » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 20:32:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', ' ')
PowerDowner = Somebody who thinks that we will face prolonged econonomic depression, some resource wars but contained, some die-off but mainly in third world countries. Societies and countries will remain mostly intact, biofuels and sustainable energy will play a role in a new economic equilibrium.



Not even close. A PowerDowner believes we must downscale every aspect of our lives, restrict per capita consumption, and reduce the population from it's current level. We should develop sustainable energies that do not exceed the earth's capacity to prodcue or absorb.


it's purely a question of interpretion and my definitions will do fine for this poll, thank you.
Bas
 
Top

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Grifter » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 21:20:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', ' ')
PowerDowner = Somebody who thinks that we will face prolonged econonomic depression, some resource wars but contained, some die-off but mainly in third world countries. Societies and countries will remain mostly intact, biofuels and sustainable energy will play a role in a new economic equilibrium.



Not even close. A PowerDowner believes we must downscale every aspect of our lives, restrict per capita consumption, and reduce the population from it's current level. We should develop sustainable energies that do not exceed the earth's capacity to prodcue or absorb.


it's purely a question of interpretion and my definitions will do fine for this poll, thank you.


I prefer your interpetation because it it made me not a doomer. If I use monte's then I'm back to doomer. Bummer.

I chose between doomer and powerdowner btw.
User avatar
Grifter
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 796
Joined: Wed 29 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: England
Top

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Omnitir » Fri 02 Feb 2007, 21:42:05

None of us neatly slot into a single category of peaknic, or even somewhere between two different categories.

Does powerdowner necessarily mean believing in a dieoff, or is that more doomer? Does believing in possible mitigation of disruptions through powerdown mean purely powerdowner, or does any belief in a relatively smooth transition make one a cornicopian? Does believing in a continuing role of technology in our future necessarily mean cornicopian, or is that part powerdowner?

These definitions that we use are useless. We are all a little bit of everything, it’s just a question of how much percentage of each.


I’ve been told that I’m a cornucopian simply because I believe that future technologies will be of huge importance in shaping the future. I believe in a high-tech future. But I also think we are headed for some difficult times which we will only be able to get through with powerdown ideals. So I guess I’m also somewhere in between powerdownder and cornucopian. Yet most doomers would easily consider me a cornucopian. Likewise, I would consider some people’s ideas of a powerdown to be far more doomer then powerdown. But then I also think that in the long run, advanced technology is our only hope, which makes me part doomer.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby johnmarkos » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 01:11:22

Like Omnitir said, only more so. ;)

I believe that reality is complex.

Nonetheless, I'm ~75% optimistic. This is likely a genetic predisposition.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby gg3 » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 02:36:42

Doomer who acts like a powerdowner.

That is, I think the shit is going to hit the fan hard, but I'm doing everything I can to contribute to mitigating the impact. Seems to me that's the most realistic approach.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Wednesday » Sat 03 Feb 2007, 21:19:21

In between Doomer and Powerdowner.
The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.
~Friedrich Nietzsche~
Wednesday
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 763
Joined: Wed 29 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Central Texas

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby kmann » Sun 04 Feb 2007, 00:04:37

I voted cornucopian because I've been accused of it. Besides, I always vote for the underdog. The description given best fits my views. I'm not saying we'll be pumping crude forever, just that we'll get more and more utility out of it until it's no longer needed. Upheaval from shortages? Probably no more than now or in the past.
Ask me on another day and I'll likely give a different answer.
User avatar
kmann
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon 25 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Doomer or PowerDowner?

Postby Bas » Sun 04 Feb 2007, 00:11:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kmann', 'I') voted cornucopian because I've been accused of it. Besides, I always vote for the underdog. The description given best fits my views. I'm not saying we'll be pumping crude forever, just that we'll get more and more utility out of it until it's no longer needed. Upheaval from shortages? Probably no more than now or in the past.
Ask me on another day and I'll likely give a different answer.


I think everyone on this site has been accused of being cornucopian, aside from that, I too give different answers on different days and on an extreme happy day I could give an answer almost as "cornucopian" as yours :)
Bas
 
Top

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron