by MrBill » Mon 29 Jan 2007, 04:44:50
There is no denying that power corrupts and that absolute power corrupts absolutely. I think that is well established. Hence the checks & balances that are imposed on the system to keep the playing field level.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U').S. government prosecutors announced charges Tuesday against the former head of the United Nations oil-for-food program, accusing him of receiving $160,000 in kickbacks from sales of Iraqi oil under the government of Saddam Hussein.
The seven-count indictment, unsealed in Federal District Court in Manhattan, was brought against Benon V. Sevan, 69, a Cypriot who served as executive director of the $64 billion aid program from 1997 until mid-2003. He was accused together with Ephraim Nadler, 79, a naturalized American citizen born in Egypt, of taking illegal commissions from an Egyptian oil trader in exchange for helping him secure contracts to purchase Iraqi oil. Both were charged with conspiracy and wire fraud.
Ex-chief of UN oil-for-food program is charged
Look at the pressure to regulate private equity and hedge funds. Technically, it is none of the regulators business and private investors do not have to invest in either private equity or hedge funds. They have organized exchanges and publicly traded companies that are more transparent and have to follow a stricter set of rules and regulations.
But because all investors interact with one another. They all draw from the same pool of funding. They buy and sell the same types of instruments. The regulators are keen to keep an eye on private equity and hedge funds as well.
I am of a mixed opinion on this subject. First of all I can see the regulator's point of view. If something has the potential to disrupt markets and hurt individual investors then they need to be involved. However, private equity and hedge funds sprung up precisely because some markets were becoming over-regulated and compliance too expensive. So I feel for the investor or owners of capital that are fleeing the long-arm of the regulators who are also guilty of mission creep.
This forum on peak oil dot com is about the economic ramifications of hydrocarbon depletion. I think that is the main issue.
International accounting standards, organized exchanges, regulators, public companies, hedge funds, etc. are all fascinating subjects. I think personally the whole system has gotten too complex for its own health. However, you have to recognize that it has gotten so complex in response to each successive crisis in confidence where voters and shareholders have demanded the government get involved. It did not evolve of its own volition.
Aside from protecting widows and orphans the system now tries to protect every investor from making their own mistakes. Out of such complexity stems huge bureaucracies where it is possible to abide by the letter of the law while still violating its spirit. If tax loop holes and special purpose vehicles did not exist then accountants, lawyers and the bosses that hire them could not exploit them. Period.
I know it is popular to hate big business, big government, big oil and big brother. But let's be fair. Who creates big government for example except the voters and their collective actions over time. On that point I agree 100% with The Great Mogambo Guru (TGMG). We, collectively, simply cannot resist the temptation to meddle and as a result we end of making the system more complex and costlier instead of simpler to administer.
I bet that if publicly traded companies were absolutely free of all regulation that a) investors would be much more careful in which company they risked their money, and b) good companies would strive to be open and transparent in order to attract investor funding.
There should be no such thing as passive investing. I do not trust my banker, my broker, my investment advisor or anyone else when making decisions about my finances. It is my money and if I lose it they will not have to pay for it. I will suffer. So I read every contract before I sign it and I make my own investment decisions.
And, yes, my investment advisors have also lied to me by not disclosing all the transaction fees even though I directly asked them. So, yes, some of them are crooks. I am far more wary of the small time investment advisor collecting front-end fees from mutual fund sales then I am of regulated broker-dealers. If you have any doubts check that a broker is part of an investor compensation scheme and what the conditions of that scheme is as well as who regluates them and their ombudsman.
But just because I have been burned a few times it does not mean I have the luxury of not investing intelligently. Because asset price inflation is constantly eating away at my savings, and the uncertainly of the future, like peak oil depletion for example, means I need to grow my money, so that I have the assets to deal with that uncertainty. However, I am now even more careful than ever. Get a good lawyer and an accountant you can trust. They are money well invested.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.