by gego » Thu 25 Jan 2007, 02:39:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')
Secondly, the question is not some Bushesqe fantasy of freedom vs. those that hate freedom. The question is of whose freedom is pre-eminent. Should local people have the right to control the flavor of communities and their local commerce or should distant corporations have a right to impose their procrustean ideas of commerce, craft the whole world in their image, and convert it into a giant conveyer of cash going into a perpetually shrinking collection of pockets. Living in a world where everywhere looks like everywhere else and all the commerce is controlled by a few dozen CEO's thousands of miles away who suck up all the profits does not strike me as being freedom.
Your view of freedom is absurd. Just because you band together with some of your neighbors, you do not suddenly have the right to control what someone or some corporation does with its property so long as they do not commit overt acts of aggression against you. Competition in not aggression.
You are a fascist, pure and simple; that is not an accusation, it is a simple observation based on what you advocate. Maybe others should decide how you use your property based on their own wants and economic needs and tell you how to live your life, where to live and what business you are entitled to enter or not.
Your thinking makes me feel contempt toward you.