Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trader's Corner 2007

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will WTI crude be on DEC 31st 2007?

Poll ended at Thu 19 Apr 2007, 04:20:21

under $50 per barrel
5
No votes
around $55
0
0%
around $60
5
No votes
around $65
12
No votes
around $70
11
No votes
around $75
28
No votes
 
Total votes : 61

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby pup55 » Sun 21 Jan 2007, 16:59:18

Mr. Bill:

Do you have access to open interest numbers for crude oil? I recall dimly last week or so on this board the statement was made that there are a lot of open naked short sales outstanding at the moment, but would like more detail on this.

NYMEX.com has the open interest, which is greatly higher for March than it is for February, which is what we would expect as we approach the expiry, but it's not given whether the open orders are long or short.

Anyway this would be interesting to know, as a potential indicator of a change in market emotion, also as an idea as to whether or not a short squeeze is imminent.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 07:03:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'M')r. Bill:

Do you have access to open interest numbers for crude oil? I recall dimly last week or so on this board the statement was made that there are a lot of open naked short sales outstanding at the moment, but would like more detail on this.

NYMEX.com has the open interest, which is greatly higher for March than it is for February, which is what we would expect as we approach the expiry, but it's not given whether the open orders are long or short.

Anyway this would be interesting to know, as a potential indicator of a change in market emotion, also as an idea as to whether or not a short squeeze is imminent.


Hello, I know the longs/shorts are contained in the commitments of traders reports, which if I am correct are reported on the NYMEX, but not the ICE? In any case, I look at the COTS reports here.

COTS

They show commercial hedgers increasing their net shorts while large traders/speculators are increasing their longs. However, this is futures only and does not include OTC deals or option contracts. Thanks.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Commodities
Energy Weekly

Despite high volatility more evidence of tighter global fundamentals


Weather, producer selling and "negative gamma" continue to weigh on the oil market

Despite a rebound on Friday, the oil market continued to sell off last
week, as the combination of warm weather, producer selling, and negative gamma effects that we discussed in our last weekly maintained downward pressure along the whole crude oil forward curve. We are still, however, confident that these trading factors will unwind in the coming weeks and months in the reverse order they impacted the market, with the weather effects taking the longest to reverse.

The global oil market continued to draw inventories in December

Despite last week's US crude oil stock build, reports from the International Energy Agency and other industry sources confirmed that the global oil market continued to clean up during December. Further, the non-weather-related demand outlook continued to improve on the back of constructive economic data and supportive price effects. Aggregating regional data, we estimate that in
December total OECD crude stocks drew by over 47 mln bbls or 5%, scoring one of the largest draws in the past 15 years for December. Despite the record warm temperatures, the total OECD hydrocarbon stocks declined by over 41 mln bbls, or 1.5%.

US ethanol margin drop to negative levels

The increase in natural gas prices along with the sharp rise in corn prices and the decline in the oil price has put enormous pressure on ethanol margins, which dropped to negative levels over the past week. We believe that negative margins are not sustainable and will have to reverse in coming weeks, as ethanol output (not capacity expansions) will likely be impacted.

Source: Goldman Sachs Commodities Research
January 21, 2007
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby shakespear1 » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 08:49:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', 'US ethanol margin drop to negative levels

The increase in natural gas prices along with the sharp rise in corn prices and the decline in the oil price has put enormous pressure on ethanol margins, which dropped to negative levels over the past week. We believe that negative margins are not sustainable and will have to reverse in coming weeks, as ethanol output (not capacity expansions) will likely be impacted. ')

This is very interesting. It show the impact of weather and harvest level impact on ethanol profitability.
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby DantesPeak » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 09:51:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ecember total OECD crude stocks drew by over 47 mln bbls or 5%, scoring one of the largest draws in the past 15 years for December. Despite the record warm temperatures, the total OECD hydrocarbon stocks declined by over 41 mln bbls, or 1.5%.


This is also interesting. OECD stocks dropped more in the fourth quarter more than most anyone expected – which is even more surprising considering record late 2006 warmth in continental US.

I still have difficulty believing the markets are truly efficient, perhaps mostly efficient and partly backwards looking would be a better explanation. The markets seemed to have taken quite a bit of time to realize a summertime build up in stocks occurred, and will perhaps take just as long to realize OECD stocks are dropping – maybe 200 million barrels or more in the fourth/first quarters.
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby pup55 » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 12:32:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hey show commercial hedgers increasing their net shorts while large traders/speculators are increasing their longs. However, this is futures only and does not include OTC deals or option contracts


Yep, this is it, Thanks, Mr. Bill

I guess this shows that for every buyer there is a seller, and vice versa.

Also it shows that the commercials and the large traders drive the market, which we knew.

Also, about half the time, maybe more, changes in sentiment by these two groups signal shifts in market emotion.

We will see what happens.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 16:26:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ecember total OECD crude stocks drew by over 47 mln bbls or 5%, scoring one of the largest draws in the past 15 years for December. Despite the record warm temperatures, the total OECD hydrocarbon stocks declined by over 41 mln bbls, or 1.5%.


This is also interesting. OECD stocks dropped more in the fourth quarter more than most anyone expected – which is even more surprising considering record late 2006 warmth in continental US.

I still have difficulty believing the markets are truly efficient, perhaps mostly efficient and partly backwards looking would be a better explanation. The markets seemed to have taken quite a bit of time to realize a summertime build up in stocks occurred, and will perhaps take just as long to realize OECD stocks are dropping – maybe 200 million barrels or more in the fourth/first quarters.


Absolutely, as Pup55 said, for every buyer there is a seller. What we saw last summer was a $20 premium for the risk of a supply disruption that did not materialize. I guess we might therefore factor in a $40 rise with an actual supply disruption? As someone else said, peak oil may not signal ever higher prices, but greater volatility as our worst fears are either borne out or not? Thanks for the comments. I am sick at home. Keeping my distance from my colleagues. Will be back later this week. Cheers.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby pup55 » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 21:57:19

My other favorite commodity expression is: "every rally sows the seeds of the next crash, and vice versa". In the world of the grains, a price of $7 for beans and $4 for corn induces every farmer in Iowa or elsewhere to go out and plant to the hedgerows and if the weather cooperates, the prices are right back down where they were by the following fall. The farmers quit planting, there is a shortage, and the cycle starts again.

In the case of oil, it works the same. high prices mean more production, more debottlenecking, more security guards in Nigeria to protect the platforms from the local militias, and less consumption in places like Japan where they are smart enough to do without it, but the price goes down and people stop doing all of that stuff and before you know it, the prices back off, and people go back to normal and the cycle starts again.

The minor exception to the whole thing will be when "the peak" as we have grown to know it, finally hits for real, and no amount of extra drilling or effort on anybody's part will cause production to go up and satisfy the demand panic. Then we're off and running.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby cube » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 22:02:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', '.')..
I still have difficulty believing the markets are truly efficient, perhaps mostly efficient and partly backwards looking would be a better explanation.
...
Is the market efficient...or was it deficient? :lol: You can spend the rest of your life trying to figure that out.

I gave up trying to answer that question.

However I am absolutely certain that it is people's actions which drive the market and people / humans don't always use logic. The world would be a very different place if everybody used logic.
Image
This is why a computer can NEVER beat the market. It is not a matter of addition and substraction...or however complex the mathematical algorithms, but instead the "madness" of men that drive the markets.

Woes to those who spent $3,000 on some crazy software program that will supposedly make them rich by correctly calling the tops and bottoms of a market.

Have crude prices hit the bottom? I honestly do NOT know. However I will know when I see it thru the rear view mirror. :-D
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 05:38:25

Don't forget every post from now on has to start or end with the economic ramifications of post peak oil depletion otherwise I will be forced to move you to the Open Forum. Come on guys, no talking about markets in the abstract.

Back to Pup55's comment that every rally sows the seeds of its own destruction. Ditto for peak oil. Had we never drilled that first hole in the first place we would not be worried about running out of plentiful, cheap energy now. Wow, cosmic! ; - )

But seriously post peak oil depletion is about markets. Markets for physical assets like food, clothing, shelter, heat and the basics we need, plus those things we want. That means that just as the present reflects the past, the future will look at least somewhat like the present. We all agree the current system is unsustainable, but our institutions, religions, cultural practices, nation states, governments, etcetera will either guide the future or haunt it.

So to look at the future we need to look at trends in real estate, interest rates, commodity prices and other economic indicators like inflation and money supply or foreign exchange rates. These are not constants, but they guide our forecasting. Just as 16th century banking looks very much then as it does today, and we still refer to the bubbles in South Seas real estate or tulip bulbs in the same breath as the dot con bubble. Each was caused by different events, but they also had many similarities.

Even if post peak oil depletion causes a discontinuous change as a ready substitute for our current energy needs is not available we will fall back on what we know in response, and we have real time examples of various worst case scenarios like Zimbabwe and Rwanda or Argentina. The developing world offers us many clues to what our collective future may look like if we fail to adjust our energy needs lower while continuing to look for effective alternatives.

I dislike talking about these things in Trader’s Corner because many of those type of conversations risk getting seriously off-track and ultimately dying on these boards as the posters cannot agree what the future will look like and/or lose interest. While new posters want to have a conversation in real-time and are not particularly interested to wade through long, rambling posts from others where there is no editing or summary and each valid point of view is mixed-in and diluted by an opinion lacking in fact. The reader is left to decide which is which.

I prefer to concentrate on the here and now by talking about what is happening in the markets at the moment. In the overall context that decisions made in Russia, Iran or Nigeria do affect energy security and therefore are important in the discussion about peak oil. I do not find it necessary to draw that line in each and every posting. High prices for energy lead to the search for more oil as well as for alternatives. Those include clean burning coal or coal to liquids as well as reassessing the viability of nuclear energy.

The electricity grid in Europe runs on the least cost substitution of coal for natural gas as well as linking into alternative sources of power such as wind and solar as well as hydroelectric. It is not the single variable, oil, it is the energy mix that matters. The more infrastructure that runs on alternatives the less it depends on oil or gas. That energy is then available for the search and development of new sources of energy. It does not free us of the need for reliable energy any more than the large dinner I had last night means I do not eventually have to think about eating today or tomorrow at the latest.

If you believe that no alternatives exist to petroleum. And if you believe the system cannot continue to function as it is. Then the conversation about the economic ramifications of post peak oil depletion is a very short one. Economic collapse and massive die-off. You do not have to endlessly debate which industry will succumb first or whether some of you or any of you will survive. There are millions of variables and no forecast can hope to be accurate with any degree of certainty. You may as well find religion and hope there is a life after death. There is no use pretending you’re more clever than the next and writing about all the symptoms of post peak oil depletion.

We have collectively gotten ourselves into this mess, like wandering through a very dark, dense forest. My only compass are the markets that tell me what is happening today. They may or may not help me to find my way, but walking around in circles is no solution either. Anyone that pretends they know what the future looks like without understanding how markets works today is just kidding themselves. That is dangerous in itself. Especially if they make sound, logical arguments that are not grounded in facts and supported by the data. And if they convince others that they alone are right about the shape of the future.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby pup55 » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 16:22:17

Sorry for getting you back on task, but what do you make of the big runup today?

It looks like some of it is due to people rolling out of February contracts and into March.

Also, this issue of the SPR refilling may provide an opportunity for the DOE to support or tame down oil prices by timing of these purchases.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby mefistofeles » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 20:34:00

What's going with oil prices am I imagining things or were they $51.00 on the Nymex last week? I just checked the Nymex and now oil's at $55.00.

Anyone havve any ideas on what might be going on?
User avatar
mefistofeles
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby pup55 » Tue 23 Jan 2007, 21:40:21

Possibilities:

a. The fundamentals have been going this way for awhile. I did not think it would happen until March or so.

b. Bloomberg thinks that it is due to the forecasts of colder weather, on top of the additional anticipated purchases for the SPR that are supposed to be announced tonight.

c. This has some characteristics of a proverbial "short squeeze" where there were a lot of open orders going short, which had to be covered all of a sudden when the market reversed.

d. Also, the February contract expired within the last day or so, I think, and the march contract, which was always a little more expensive, became the "forward month" contract, which is reported in the media, making it look like a jump..

It will be interesting to see in the next few days whether this backs off. The inventory report tomorrow should show a little build in inventories, if my calculations are right, so that will be a test of whether this is a true reversal, or just a sucker rally.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 24 Jan 2007, 04:09:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'S')orry for getting you back on task, but what do you make of the big runup today?

It looks like some of it is due to people rolling out of February contracts and into March.

Also, this issue of the SPR refilling may provide an opportunity for the DOE to support or tame down oil prices by timing of these purchases.


Heating oil and natural gas were the big gainers with colder weather reminding us that winter is not over, yet. High wind storms that caused considerable damage across western Europe have been followed now by snow and colder weather. Nothing off the thermometer, but enough of an excuse for some sellers to cover their shorts and trigger a rally from oversold conditions.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Trading recommendation: Buy May 2007 ethanol margin

Buy May 2007 ethanol margin; Current price: $-0.387/bu
Margin = ethanol price * 2.6 - natural gas price * 0.13 - corn price

Buy 2.60 gallons of May 2007 CBOT ethanol
Sell 0.13 mmBtus of May 2007 NYMEX natural gas
Sell 1.00 bushels of May 2007 CBOT corn

Note: This assumes the technology can convert 1 bushel of corn into 2.6 gallons of ethanol and will burn 0.13 mmBtus of natural gas in the process.

We expect ethanol margins to improve

As we noted in our January 21, 2007 Energy Weekly, spot and forward ethanol margins have turned negative in the recent period. Expected shifts in ethanol, natural gas and corn prices should result in stronger margins. We are therefore recommending a long position in the May 2007 ethanol margin.
Source: Goldman Sachs Commodities Research
January 23, 2007
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 24 Jan 2007, 04:14:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'P')ossibilities:

a. The fundamentals have been going this way for awhile. I did not think it would happen until March or so.

b. Bloomberg thinks that it is due to the forecasts of colder weather, on top of the additional anticipated purchases for the SPR that are supposed to be announced tonight.

c. This has some characteristics of a proverbial "short squeeze" where there were a lot of open orders going short, which had to be covered all of a sudden when the market reversed.

d. Also, the February contract expired within the last day or so, I think, and the march contract, which was always a little more expensive, became the "forward month" contract, which is reported in the media, making it look like a jump..

It will be interesting to see in the next few days whether this backs off. The inventory report tomorrow should show a little build in inventories, if my calculations are right, so that will be a test of whether this is a true reversal, or just a sucker rally.


I do not disagree with you at all. This from Bloomberg this morning.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')rude oil fell in New York, paring
yesterday's 4.7 percent gain, as a U.S. government report today
may show commercial stockpiles rose for a second week.
U.S. inventories probably increased 1.3 million barrels
last week, according to a survey of analysts by Bloomberg News.
Yesterday, prices jumped after the U.S. announced plans to
double the country's emergency oil stockpiles.

The U.S. reserves, the world's largest emergency crude oil
holdings, and similar stockpiles in Europe and Asia are held to
make up for disruptions of global oil supplies.
The U.S. government holds 691 million barrels, roughly
equivalent to 55 days of imports, Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman
said. The expanded reserve, stored in salt caverns along the U.S.
Gulf Coast, will cater for rising energy demand and will hold
the equivalent of about 97 days of U.S. oil imports, he said.

Source: Bloomberg, January 24, 2006

That would be in addition to China's plans to also build their own SPR, but I have seen no concrete numbers on that, yet, only announcements made to the Press. However, one would assume it is more attractive to build reserves at $50 per barrel rather than $60 or higher. Or maybe China already assumes VZL's reserves are as good as its own?

This week while I was home sick I saw a good film on West Deutscher Rundfunk (WDR) about the German automobile industry and why they were falling behind the Japanese in terms of hybrid technology. It was not encouraging at all. Basically, consumers are still demanding more PS (or HP) from their German automobiles, so that is what the German car makers are building and promoting.

Sure they have lots of innovations in the top drawer that they can pull-out if prices continue to go higher, but at current levels ($5-6 per gallon for benzine) customers still prefer performance over fuel economy. So in terms of peak oil it is really not good at all if the tolerance for higher prices means that even at twice the current price in America that drivers would sooner spend more than change their habits.

Even specialized tuning and the ready conversion of cars to natural gas is not a popular alternative even for drivers who commute or drive long distances. A simple tuning can improve mileage by 1 to 2 liters per 100 kilometers for example just by tweaking the chip that control performance versus fuel economy. Aside from complaining about high pump prices most drivers are simply not prepared to do anything about it, so only physical shortages are likely to have any psychological effect on the peak oil debate it seems?

Well, after being away from the office for almost 10-days, first in Vienna on business and then home sick, I am quite snowed under here with work AND my Reuters is not working properly. Therefore, will have to report back later. Good luck.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby shakespear1 » Wed 24 Jan 2007, 04:54:35

I suspect that if the media/politicians/actors were talking about Peak Oil and Global Warming perhaps they might change their minds. Or how about Schwarzenegger doing a futuristic film where he drives an economy car , "small und wiz hay gez milag" :-)

He did wonders for cigar industry, Hummer etc. :-D :-D :-D
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 24 Jan 2007, 05:01:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shakespear1', 'I') suspect that if the media/politicians/actors were talking about Peak Oil and Global Warming perhaps they might change their minds. Or how about Schwarzenegger doing a futuristic film where he drives an economy car , "small und wiz hay gez milag" :-)

He did wonders for cigar industry, Hummer etc. :-D :-D :-D


Another TV program I saw yesterday did a special on tuning cars, not for fuel economy, but for performance. I think they improved the Hummer from 300 to 500 PS (but don't quote me on that)? Great, just what you need for the autobahns in Europe. A Hummer that slurps up 20 liters per 100 kms! And who says, Europeans dislike Americans? ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 24 Jan 2007, 09:03:37

This is another example of why in the case of energy consumption, , for some reason, the market system does not work efficiently. People, apparently even Germans, do not necessarily make choices in their own best interest.

In the USA, even during the worst of the high prices last summer, people were buying SUV's for the "safety and comfort and power" factor. GM, incredulously, interpereted this as a sign that they should start to gear back up on SUV production.

I guess the consuming public has not yet reached the point of "capitulation" on this issue of fuel efficient vehicles. Until this happens, you will not be able to get them out of their cushy mercedes and beemers.

I think the bulk of the public, and also the traders (to keep this thread in compliance) are still with the old paradigm. This being the case, there will continue to be emotional restraint which will keep the market from blowing up exponentially.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 24 Jan 2007, 11:09:31

They interviewed one of the original founders of the SWATCH auto who along with Daimler-Chrysler turned it from a rechargeable electric vehicle into a fashion accessory. Yes, he is a little bitter.

But as in life as in trading timing is everything!

I stumbled across some notes scribbled into the margins of a magazine I was reading last summer. Apparently, I sold quite a chunk of crude up around $7728? Well, if I did, I did not hold onto that short long enough!

Now, I will go out on a limb and say we have probably seen the lows for now. But predicting the weather is a mug's game, so I will wimp out and stress the 'probably' part.

Getting some help in the energy from the base and precious metals, which are up 2-3% today as well. Strangely enough the dollar is also stronger today against the euro? Well, the trends are positively, not perfectly, correlated most of the time.

Oil equities have all jumped recently making-up about one-third of their slide since the end of last year. I am not adding to those positions, but just riding them out just in case as you say this is a fool's rally.

Crack spreads reflecting refining margins are stable at around $8-9 per barrel, which is about average, but nothing to write home about. I remember the day that Sunoco inside traders starting selling their shares last summer. Margins were around $20 per barrel at the time. I thought, hmm, strange? But their timing could not have been better. Something I will have to keep a closer eye on in the future.

Being back I have had triple doses today of both Kunstler and The Mogambo Guru. Doomer stuff. But many good points to keep in mind as the summer-like weather in mid-winter was lulling all the bulls into hybernation instead of vice versa. Well, no new insights, so I will just wait for the crude stock releases later. Cheers.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby cube » Wed 24 Jan 2007, 13:25:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '.')..
Now, I will go out on a limb and say we have probably seen the lows for now. But predicting the weather is a mug's game, so I will wimp out and stress the 'probably' part.
....
MrBill I have followed this board for over a year and this is the FIRST time I remember you ever trying to call a top or bottom.

There's a joke they have within the financial news community:

"Name a price or time...but NEVER both." :lol:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2007

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 25 Jan 2007, 03:58:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '.')..
Now, I will go out on a limb and say we have probably seen the lows for now. But predicting the weather is a mug's game, so I will wimp out and stress the 'probably' part.
....
MrBill I have followed this board for over a year and this is the FIRST time I remember you ever trying to call a top or bottom.

There's a joke they have within the financial news community:

"Name a price or time...but NEVER both." :lol:


I usually just indicate where I see support or resistance and where I have bought or sold. The problem with calling tops or bottoms is the psychological effect of anchoring your outlook to your forecast. It puts a bias in your thinking.

The oldest maxim in trading is 'the trend is your friend' which is basically momentum investing. My models use a combination of short, medium and long-term moving averages to help average into a full long or full short position.

The only exception is when as I have often stated the market gets more than 3-standard deviations from its mean and gets into either overbought or oversold territory. Only at those points should one take a contrarian point of view and go against the underlying trend. However, that is most useful for either taking profit on an existing position or buying OTM options in the other direction while the market is still focussed on the end of the trend and trying to capture the last crumbs from the table.

Other than that I think a mature trader is quite indifferent to $50, $60 or $70 oil as at every price there is a 50/50 chance of it going up or down. Also at $53.46, $49.72 and $62.94, which are not round numbers and therefore do not catch the Press' imagination.

Of course, you can always take a punt and either buy or sell based on your tummy. That is fine for day trading. Just use stop losses and be prepared to admit you're wrong if it goes against you. Another maxim, your first loss, is your best loss.

At the moment we are in a down move on the weekly charts, but the hourly and daily are moving upwards towards resistance in the crude around $59-60. However, support is not particularly robust as we saw yesterday when we dipped after the release of the DOE stock report that showed demand down while overall supplies rose.

The strongest trends are obviously those where the technicals support the fundamentals and the weekly, daily and even the hourly are all pointing in the same direction. But as we also often say, the fundamentals are always the clearest at the top and at the bottom of each trend. When the last long sells at a loss or the last short stops out then it is time for a reversal.

So those who call for tops or bottoms are usually not very successful traders. And remember a broken clock can be right twice a day, so someone who is always bullish or always bearish will be right some of the time. It does not make them a good trader. Sometimes they get lucky and are in the right place at the right time. Then making money for a while is easy!
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron