by pup55 » Mon 13 Dec 2004, 14:39:11
I don't think Swedes are, on the whole, any "smarter" than Americans. There is nothing in the water over here that makes us stupid (that we are aware of).
If you take some Swedish babies and bring them over here and feed them a diet high in sugar and fat, put them in day care and minimize parental exposure, make them watch thousands of hours of TV, and let them vegetate in the American school system for 16 years, they will be just as stupid as the rest of the Americans.
As far as the leadership is concerned, being smart has not worked in your favor as far as becoming a leader in America since about 1980. Much better to be tall, good looking, and able to raise money from wealthy contributors. This goes for State and Local leaders, as well as national.
Also, we have just had a 9-month, $1 billion dollar advertising campaign in the US that says that the "other guy" running for government office is not competent, and we will be worse off if he gets elected. The result is that no matter who wins our elections, at least half the voters, plus all of the people who did not vote, will have no confidence in the winner. That way, any decision that is made, especially if it is a little bit creative, or forces people to change their behavior will have minimal popular support. This has also trickled down to our State and Local leaders.
Also, we are carrying about the bottom third of the population on our backs at a given moment: inner city types, hip hoppers, hillbillies, etc. whose culture is so far removed from making steel or anything else that they have no clue whatsoever what is going on anywhere outside their six-city-block area, and spend most of their time reproducing, doing violence to each other, and doing other completely unproductive non-metallurgical activities which do nothing except shorten their life expenctancy and ensure another generation that accomplishes even less than they did.
So, given all this, it's surprising we are able to even put together a decent army. At the moment, despite outnumbering Iraq 15-1 in population, they are fighting us about even on their own ground, so evidently, we are not even really able to do a good job at that. We cannot defend our southern border, we cannot keep illegal drugs from crossing any of the borders of the country, and we also cannot defend our own infrastructure, including two of the three tallest buildings in the country, from attack at a given moment.
Still, there is hope. Maybe we can import some engineers and teachers from Sweden and catch up within a few years.
p.s. Just in case it comes up, no I do not hate America, I like it a lot, just hate it when we do things stupidly. Also, the "typical American" has a reasonable amount of common sense, and if you can get to him or her to pay attention long enough, typically they will make decent decisions, and agree with somebody organizing the sort of projects you are talking about to get out of a little bit of trouble. The question is, should it be the American government, in whom we have minimal confidence, or somebody else? Eventually, if things get serious enough, we still have the capacity to fix our problems we have and move forward. It has to get pretty serious, though, before we will focus this incredible creative energy.
It is evidently not serious enough yet on the issue of steel, or oil, for that matter.