Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby jupiters_release » Sat 13 Jan 2007, 10:57:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'T')he price of power is money, obviously. However, big business is not a complete monolith that walks in lock-step. Industries such as agriculture and disaster insurance (and reinsurance) that are presently taking a hit from global warming, can be expected to contribute to the Gore campaign, along with the usual Democratic constituencies.

And face it folks, Gore's the best chance we have. No other credible candidate is giving this stuff more than a few sentences. Gore is also a good bet just on sheer probability: he won in 2000, he's gotten bigger since then (he just sold out a football stadium gig in the midwest, 12,000 people bought tickets to his upcoming speech), and the man who stole the election from him is now in the 30% approval range and dropping daily as he keeps shooting himself in the foot in Iraq.

It would not surprise me if Gore was speaking to business leaders behind the scenes. And don't forget, these are smart & educated people who, unlike the core Bush constituency, believe in science.


Have you read anything about central banking? It should be obvious now after over a century of industrialization, TPTB are not interested in sustainability, Al Gore was lucky they took the presidency from him, he's way too soft to have gone along with the 9/11 program.
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 13 Jan 2007, 12:58:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'T')he price of power is money, obviously. However, big business is not a complete monolith that walks in lock-step. Industries such as agriculture and disaster insurance (and reinsurance) that are presently taking a hit from global warming, can be expected to contribute to the Gore campaign, along with the usual Democratic constituencies.

And face it folks, Gore's the best chance we have. No other credible candidate is giving this stuff more than a few sentences. Gore is also a good bet just on sheer probability: he won in 2000, he's gotten bigger since then (he just sold out a football stadium gig in the midwest, 12,000 people bought tickets to his upcoming speech), and the man who stole the election from him is now in the 30% approval range and dropping daily as he keeps shooting himself in the foot in Iraq.

It would not surprise me if Gore was speaking to business leaders behind the scenes. And don't forget, these are smart & educated people who, unlike the core Bush constituency, believe in science.


Have you read anything about central banking? It should be obvious now after over a century of industrialization, TPTB are not interested in sustainability, Al Gore was lucky they took the presidency from him, he's way too soft to have gone along with the 9/11 program.


9/11 was pure neo-con. Had Gore gotten in, it simply would not have happened.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby jupiters_release » Sat 13 Jan 2007, 22:45:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '9')/11 was pure neo-con. Had Gore gotten in, it simply would not have happened.


The neo-cons may have logistically controlled 9/11 but they're only working for TPTB, even if the 2000 election were honored they wouldn't let a president get in the way of their policy decisions. Seeing how Gore did such an abrupt about-face from adamantly fighting the Florida switch to surrendering his presidency literally overnight in order "to preserve the public faith", someone must have told him it wasn't his choice to make.
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby Revi » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 00:03:40

I think that the chance of an oil shock is pretty good, considering all the wierd stuff going on. Have you noticed that Iran is back in the nightly news? That's how they get us ready for the next bit of nonsense they are about to pull. Have everybody watch the news about Iran and how they are making IED's. Isn't it the Sunnis who are planting them? Have you heard of the Shia doing that sort of thing? Anyway, I can see this whole thing getting out of hand quickly, the price of oil shooting back up and the oil shock starting pretty soon. It might not, but there is at least a 20% chance!
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 01:03:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '9')/11 was pure neo-con. Had Gore gotten in, it simply would not have happened.


The neo-cons may have logistically controlled 9/11 but they're only working for TPTB, even if the 2000 election were honored they wouldn't let a president get in the way of their policy decisions. Seeing how Gore did such an abrupt about-face from adamantly fighting the Florida switch to surrendering his presidency literally overnight in order "to preserve the public faith", someone must have told him it wasn't his choice to make.


Maybe. Alternatively, the neocons are a rogue element within the plutocracy, who weren't taken seriously by the plutocrats, because they're so freaking weird. When they aligned themselves with right wing fundamentalist Christians, it was seen as more funny than fascist.

September 11 complicity? Those dimwits! No way it could have been Lihop, let alone mihop, or so people thought, and many still think. But you don't have to be brilliant to pull it off. You only have to have the sheer appalling audacity of the act, forever banish the idea and make despicable the question of conspiracy. As the Nazis used to say, a big lie is easier to get away with than a small lie.

The Mayberry Machiovellis are stunted, both emotionally and culturally. They are impoverished spiritually and they are moral dwarfs. It's important to remember, though, that they can be all these things, and still be strategically brilliant.

We are civilized people, with no first hand experience with politicians of this ilk. The Neo-cons are qualitatively different than the standard American politician, who is compromised and corrupt, but not a criminal capable of serial murder. This is the essential difference.

Many find it hard to believe that the neocons, apparent fools, are THE controlling forces in the country. I mean, you want your dictators to be shadowy, menacing, or at least controlled by that type. Men who meet in dark wood panelled rooms wearing smoking jackets and listening to Stravinsky, while discussing geopolitical tensions, have much more appeal than the reality; Cheney and Bush kicking back with a beer, watching football and discussing how they're going to kick Iranian butt.

I think both Gore and Kerry were threatened into compliance, post vote, not by dark overlords, but by the neo-cons who probably have photos, film, and testimony in manilla envelopes, ready to dispatch at a drop of a hat. They've probably spent the last 50 years digging up dirt on anyone with influence, just biding their time, waiting...
Last edited by threadbear on Sun 14 Jan 2007, 14:07:03, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby jupiters_release » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 07:48:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'M')aybe. Alternatively, the neocons are a rogue element within the plutocracy, who weren't taken seriously by the plutocrats, because they're so freaking weird. When they aligned themselves with right wing fundamentalist Christians, it was seen as more funny than fascist.


Funny to us, not sure if the Iraqis are laughing though. Naturally personal bias prevents most people on this forum from accepting that the neo-cons are only doing exactly what the banks want them to do, there's nothing rogue about it. Peak oil mitigation is an ugly thought but we have to understand central bankers not only exist but will have 'majority rule' on who dies and who doesn't. You can call it fascism but I call it good business.
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 14:03:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'M')aybe. Alternatively, the neocons are a rogue element within the plutocracy, who weren't taken seriously by the plutocrats, because they're so freaking weird. When they aligned themselves with right wing fundamentalist Christians, it was seen as more funny than fascist.


Funny to us, not sure if the Iraqis are laughing though. Naturally personal bias prevents most people on this forum from accepting that the neo-cons are only doing exactly what the banks want them to do, there's nothing rogue about it. Peak oil mitigation is an ugly thought but we have to understand central bankers not only exist but will have 'majority rule' on who dies and who doesn't. You can call it fascism but I call it good business.


The neo-cons actually went against the express desires of big oil, by going beyond regime change and removing all Bathists from their jobs, and disbanding the military, in Iraq. They did so in the interests of creating a laissez faire capitalist society, out of one that was heavily dependant on govt run institutions. The entire country was up for sale. They basically destroyed it, so that it could be built back up again, by their croney corporate pals on the American taxpayer's dime--a huge transfer of wealth from the public trough into private hands.

Do you really think that the banks and corporations sat down with the neocons and planned this, or do you think they went along for the ride, hoping there was something in it for them? I wouldn't mistake compliance for conspiracy.

You HOPE, as I do, that there is a hint of altruism, albeit twisted in nature, in the neo-con's actions--that they understand the implications of peak oil, are scared witless, and therefore are acting proactively to counter forces that could hold them hostage, before the Americans are prepared with affordable substitutes for oil. I actually doubt this. It's really all about murder and piracy. The democrats are as close to the banking institutions and corporations as the repuglicans, but they wouldn't have done what the neo-cons did.
Last edited by threadbear on Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:18:17, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby mmasters » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 14:34:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'D')o you really think that the banks and corporations sat down with the neocons and planned this, or do you think they went along for the ride

To an extent yes, absolutely. A faction of the elite devised the project, Bush & co had their bid in and were given the thumbs up. Bush and Co are in it for the spoils of serving the plutocracy. The plutocracy is the ultimate ride. It's all business for these guys. Bush and Co have been a disaster to the country but a success to the plutocracy. Why? because the plutocracy reigns globally. Dismantling the US and empowering the banks and corporations is simply part of a larger plan we will see unfold within the next decade.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Top

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:16:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mmasters', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'D')o you really think that the banks and corporations sat down with the neocons and planned this, or do you think they went along for the ride

To an extent yes, absolutely. A faction of the elite devised the project, Bush & co had their bid in and were given the thumbs up. Bush and Co are in it for the spoils of serving the plutocracy. The plutocracy is the ultimate ride. It's all business for these guys. Bush and Co have been a disaster to the country but a success to the plutocracy. Why? because the plutocracy reigns globally. Dismantling the US and empowering the banks and corporations is simply part of a larger plan we will see unfold within the next decade.


We are communicating at cross purposes here. I think that the neoconservatives are fascists and have been planning to subvert democracy in the US, for decades. Certainly defence contractors and big corporate construction companies like KBR, Hal, and security corporations like Dyncorp have much to gain, short term, by siding with neo-cons.

There is a chance some of the ceo's of these corporations, particularly Haliburton were involved in strategic planning of Iraq war. Oil companies, too, could have been briefed on the plans to go into Iraq and oust Saddam, cancel Iraq's oil contracts with foreign govts and dominate the oil infrastructure.

Whether big oil designed the plans as they were actually implemented, presenteding them to both dems and repugs to see who would bite-- Maybe, but I kind of doubt it.

If there are shadowy forces behind the neo-cons, they are most likely in Israel, and represented by the pro-Israel lobby in the US. These lobbyists exert tremendous pressure on both parties, so if you're looking for an over-arching control system that could render both parties indistinguishable from one another, on certain issues, look no further. Does this mean Israel was in on the planning of the Iraq war? Perhaps. Hard to say.

Most of the old money elite are reactionary autocrats who prefer the status quo, if it's working for them. They're philosophically more aligned with "liberals" and would likely prefer to finance research into alternative sources of energy than bomb the limbs off children to accomplish their goals.

The neo-liberal soft fascism was working quite well for the governing elites. The fist hidden in a velvet glove works much better in the long term, than the fist wrapped around brass knuckles, unless you're in organized crime.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby mmasters » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:52:32

I see what you're saying though my point is there is an over-arching control system and it goes beyond isreal, the neocons, CEOs, oil men, etc.. Most these people are just "agents" of a much greater power. This power is not public and is referred to by some as the "globalists" or the "bankers". The CFR for instance, the group which controls both the repubs and dems is layers beneath the top. The PNAC is an outgrowth of the CFR and is too rungs below the real power.

Essentially Bush and Co were hired to do a project for these guys higher up. In part, because the bush family had historical ties to them and in part because they had the right connections to do the job. That aside the spoils are rewarding to say the least.
Last edited by mmasters on Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:54:10, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby mmasters » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:53:04

double post
Last edited by mmasters on Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:55:16, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby Revi » Sun 14 Jan 2007, 15:54:55

Read Greg Palast's Armed Madhouse for what really went on in Iraq. The neo-cons were going to bring the price of oil down, and Paul Bremer got a visit from a prominent Texas oil man who told him the way things were really run. He liked the fact that oil was going up. There wasn't going to be any sale on the stuff.

I think that may be what's going on now. The price of oil is down slightly, so it's time to jack it up again. Sabre rattling isn't enough. We may have to start something with Iran. That'll get the price up some! Opec will be happy about that. They can't be disciplined enough to do it on their own. ( members cheat on their quotas) So we'll have to do it for them. $100 a barrel, here we come!
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: World Economic Forum Issues Oil Shock and Other Warnings

Unread postby Temperedoil » Mon 15 Jan 2007, 23:10:29

There have been a few warnings lately from organisations keeping watch over resources and economies, but the general tone of most of the warnings given seems to be that the problem lies in insufficient investment or the nationalisation of oil resources. It would seem to be too much of a leap (or too frightening a leap) to recognise that, regardless of how much investment may be employed, or who owns the oil or the rights to the oil, there will simply be insufficient supply to meet demand.

Everybody needs to wake up and start taking a serious look at what is happening if we are to pull through this crisis (or, combination or crises, considering that global warming and insufficient supplies of fresh water are striking us at the same time).
Temperedoil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Previous

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron