Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

atomic "memory" or "code" theory of evol

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

atomic "memory" or "code" theory of evol

Unread postby seahorse » Thu 11 Jan 2007, 21:53:44

In evolution, there are still many gaps in the origins of life, namely, how did life first begin in this big genetic soup. How RNA and DNA first developed is almost pure speculation at this point.

However, a more basic question I have is, why do atoms form anything? In the billions of atoms that comprise me, why are they all working together, in me, constantly taking on new atoms and shedding old ones? Why would they have any need or desire to "survive", when atoms have no life expectancy? The atoms in my body, are as old as the known universe, yet for some reason, they have formed this person I call me, and will attempt to pass on my traits to other atoms in a code we call DNA. I ask this question for all atoms, not just ones that form people, but trees, any form.

It seems to me the answer lies in new research being done on atoms for computers. It seems certain that atoms can store information and can receive information via light, photons. Scientist are working towards the day when information will be stored via atom and transferred via light.

So, it seems plausible that the atoms which form the world around us could easily carry in them an "atomic memory" or "code" since the beginning of the big bang, and that, when incubated properly, the code begins to function on its own, creating all the world around us that we see now.

Just a thought. If this has already been suggested, I would appreciate some links to read up on it.


All printed information could be stored in a single atom.

UWPhysics

Use of photons to carry information to atoms

Science Daily

Machine Design

The race is on for developing quantum computers, essentially showing that "coded" or "memory" stored in atoms is possible.

quantum computers wiki
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 08:32:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'I')n evolution, there are still many gaps in the origins of life, namely, how did life first begin in this big genetic soup. How RNA and DNA first developed is almost pure speculation at this point.

The only thing here, that most of scientists agree is that RNA was first.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')owever, a more basic question I have is, why do atoms form anything? In the billions of atoms that comprise me, why are they all working together, in me, constantly taking on new atoms and shedding old ones? Why would they have any need or desire to "survive", when atoms have no life expectancy? The atoms in my body, are as old as the known universe, yet for some reason, they have formed this person I call me, and will attempt to pass on my traits to other atoms in a code we call DNA. I ask this question for all atoms, not just ones that form people, but trees, any form.

This is considered to be emerging property of sufficiently complex systems.
Any atom in your body, other than hydrogen, helium or lithium is bound to be younger, than Universe.
NB. Helium is not needed for proper functioning of body and usefulness of lithium is only marginal.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t seems to me the answer lies in new research being done on atoms for computers. It seems certain that atoms can store information and can receive information via light, photons. Scientist are working towards the day when information will be stored via atom and transferred via light.

Atoms storing information - in quantum mechanical sense - yes.
Information actually is stored by atoms and transferred by light (EM radiation) right now.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o, it seems plausible that the atoms which form the world around us could easily carry in them an "atomic memory" or "code" since the beginning of the big bang, and that, when incubated properly, the code begins to function on its own, creating all the world around us that we see now.

If you talk about hydrogen, hellium and lithium atoms, than yes (in quantum mechanical sense).
In case of other atoms - no, as those did not form in the Big Bang.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby seahorse » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 09:25:05

Interesting, thanks
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby Doly » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 10:45:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', '
')However, a more basic question I have is, why do atoms form anything? In the billions of atoms that comprise me, why are they all working together, in me, constantly taking on new atoms and shedding old ones? Why would they have any need or desire to "survive", when atoms have no life expectancy?


Let me put an example to shed light in this question: Conway's Game of Life (google for it if you have never heard about it before).

Life is just a set of rules about pixels in a screen. They go on and off according to very simple rules. If you study the rules, you may be able to surmise that Life allows for static stable patterns to exist. It would be a lot harder to establish that it allows for stable patterns that move across the screen. I don't think you could figure out from the rules if it allows for patterns that create other patterns. People playing about with it on their screen have found that it's possible. Not just that, but that it's also possible to create self-reproducing patterns (in screens much larger than even found in reality). Self-reproducing patterns are the definition of life, and Conway never imagined that the name he gave was so appropiate. It remains an open question whether, in an enormous enough screen running for long enough, self-reproducing patterns would spontaneously appear from an initially random field. It also remains an open question whether there is any self-reproducing pattern that is sturdy enough to resist damage from other stray patterns in the area, and will be able to repair itself.

You could say the same thing from our Universe. Physicists are convinced that all the enormous variety of phenomena in the Universe boil down to a few (relatively) simple rules. But, by studying the rules, or even the simplest patterns (in this case, atoms), you would never be able to figure out if this Universe can sustain self-reproducing patterns (in other words, life).

This doesn't mean that there is any undiscovered secret information in atoms that we haven't figured out yet. What it means is that our brain cannot deduce this fact from learning the basic rules, because we have limited processing power. There is no hidden data, just the fact that our imagination is very limited.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 11:15:50

I read the Dawkins/Collins debate on evolution vs. religion and it seemed to come down to this on Dawkins' part: God is a cop-out. But then after the debate went on Dawkins came around to this: well if there is God then it isn't one of those old gods from the past. God is unimaginably Grand he said. No problem there. Intelligent atoms? why not, who knows? Personally, I think that DNA is much more than anyone grasps. Right now we seem to be between gods. In the fullness of time, a new God will appear, but not now. Now is decay time.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby NEOPO » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 12:30:42

1. . . . The last Vibration of the Seventh Eternity thrills through Infinitude. The Mother swells, expanding from within without, like the Bud of the Lotus.

2. The Vibration sweeps along,touching with its swift Wing the whole Universe and the Germ that dwelleth in Darkness, the Darkness that breathes over the slumbering Waters of Life..

3. Darkness radiates Light, and Light drops one solitary Ray into the Waters, into the Mother-Deep. The Ray shoots through the Virgin Egg, the Ray causes the Eternal Egg to thrill, and drop the non-eternal Germ, which condenses into the World-Egg.


4. The Three fall into the Four. The Radiant Essence becomes Seven inside, Seven outside. The Luminous Egg, which in itself is Three, curdles and spreads in milk-white Curds throughout the Depths of Mother, the root that grows in the Depths of the Ocean of Life.

5. The Root remains, the Light remains, the Curds remain and Still Oeaohoo is One.

6. The Root of Life was in every Drop of the Ocean of Immortality , and the Ocean was Radiant Light, which was Fire, and Heat, and Motion. Darkness vanished and was no more; it disappeared in its own Essence, the Body of Fire and Water, of Father and Mother.

7. Behold, O Lanoo, the Radiant Child of the Two, the unparalleled refulgent Glory- Bright Space, Son of Dark Space, who emerges from the Depths of the great Dark Waters. It is Oeaohoo, the Younger, the ***.He shine forth as the Sun,he is the Blazing Divine Dragon of Wisdom; the Eka is Chatur, and Chatur, takes to itself Tri, and the Union produces the Sapta, in whom are the Seven, which become the Tridasha, the Hosts and the Multitudes. Behold him lifting the Veil, and unfurling it from East to West. He shuts out the Above, and leaves the Below to be seen as the Great Illusion. He marks the places for the Shining Ones, and turns the Upper into a shoreless Sea of Fire, and the One Manifested into the Great Waters.

8. Where was the Germ, and where was now Darkness? Where is the Spirit of the Flame that burns in thy Lamp, O Lanoo? The Germ is That, and That is Light, the White Brilliant Son of the Dark Hidden Father.

9. Light is Cold Flame, and Flame is Fire, and Fire produces Heat, which yields Water - The Water of Life in the Great Mother.

10. Father-Mother spin a Web, whose upper end is fastened to Spirit, the Light of the One Darkness, and the lower one to its shadowy end, Matter; and this Web is the Universe, spun out of the Two Substances made in One, which is Svabhavat.

11. It expands when the Breath of Fire is upon it; it contracts when the Breath of the Mother touches it. Then the Sons dissociate and scatter, to return into their Mother's Bosom, at the end of the Great Day, and re-become one with her. When it is cooling, it becomes radiant. Its Sons expand and contract through their own Selves and Hearts; they embrace Infinitude.

12. Then Svabhavat send Fohat to harden the Atoms. Each is a part of the Web. Reflecting the "Self-Existent Lord", like a Mirror, each becomes in turn a World

The stanzas of Dzyan - Cosmogenesis - stanza 3:

THE STANZAS OF DZYAN

Science is religion is science.
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby seahorse » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:38:38

Doly,

I appreciate the link. Its interesting, but still doesn't answer the question for me. Conway was using cells, which of course, are made up of atoms. Why do atoms form anything beyond themselves? If they are following rules, then, how are they carrying the rules and how did they get in them? This is my question of atomic memory. I believe, in fact, that atoms hold a memory, a basic rule set, which under the right "genetic soup" causes the atoms to interact and begin playing out.

Conway's game of life wiki

Now, as EU points out, under the big bang theory, atoms were a product of the big bang, but, relatively speaking, they are as old as the known universe, and apparently, don't die. They are replicating not to "live" but bc they are operating under a set of rules in their atomic memory.

Brief history of the universe
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby seahorse2 » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 15:56:36

It seems the proof of an atomic code or memory is found in life itself - evolution seems to prove it.

Here's a link to "evolution" experiments using computer software.

Core Wars

The fact that atoms work to replicate or more accurately, manipulate other atoms in structures, suggest they operate under a set of rules. Evolution and "evolution" computer experiments strongly suggest the existence of an atomic memory or code, even though we can't, yet, access that code.

One might ask how atoms "communicate" or "share" information, but since we know photons can transfer information to and between atoms, it seems likely that the atomic code or memory could easily be shared or transferred via light, photons.

I don't want anyone to confuse what I'm suggesting here. I'm not suggesting for the existence or god or no god. I'm simply trying to plug a whole in evolutionary theory about the beginnings of prebiotic life: how and really WHY do atoms form RNA? why do atoms bind together to form a genetic code to replicate anything? why do they transfer genetic code DNA to "survive," when they atoms individually have no life expectancy? This all suggest a basic set of rules that they hold in an "atomic memory."

Now, I do think that if its true that atoms operate via an atomic memory or code, it leads to a philosophical question about how that code gets there, where do the rules originate.? But that's a question for another day. That could be a religious question, a physics questions etc., however that question is ultimately answered doesn't take away from the fact that atoms seem to operate via an imbedded memory.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 16:17:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', '
')Now, as EU points out, under the big bang theory, atoms were a product of the big bang, but, relatively speaking, they are as old as the known universe, and apparently, don't die. They are replicating not to "live" but bc they are operating under a set of rules in their atomic memory.

Birth & Death of atoms. This is interesting subject.

As I had noted before only isotopes of Hydrogen, Helium and Lithium were born in Big Bang.
Other atoms up to iron were made from those initial ones via stellar nuclear synthesis.
Atoms heavier than iron were made in supernovas explosions of stellar cores.
As long as I am concerned, initial quantum information from Big Bang had been (and still will be) passed in this process.

Now Death of Atoms:
This may proceed in several ways.

1. Proton Decay.
This hypothetical process (half life would be at least in 10 E35 range) could be a Nemezis of all baryonic matter (any atom is baryonic matter). Decomposition products would be subatomic particles (positrons, neutrinos, gamma rays).
Initial quantum information contained in parent atoms would be preserved, albeit is is probably impossible by means of known physics to assemble such particles into something useful in expanding Universe environment.
Proton decay had not been observed yet.

2. Death by Black Hole.
Essentially there are 2 principal scenarios of it:

- accretion into gravitationally produced black hole (stellar remnants, galactic "central" black hole etc) followed by evaporation of black holes by so called Hawking radiation.
Under this scenario atoms are transformed into microwave radiation through few "intermediate" stages.
Mass of this atoms is certainly nullified in the process and it is also possible (albeit the issue is hotly disputed), that all information contained in atoms (and then in black hole) is actually destroyed in the process.
If so, than a black hole would be a perfect cosmic "eraser".

- Conversion of atoms into tiny black holes via quantum tunelling, followed by evaporation of those thiny holes (estimated half life of most stable iron atoms is in range 10 E80 years under this scenario).
All subatomic, mass containing particles may also end their life in this way.
Again, like in previous black hole variety, there is possibility (but not certanity) of information loss.

Proper Quantum Gravity theory could well give us some definite answers about this information loss, but sadly we do not have it developed yet (and we may never get there).

3. Death by Annihilation. Theoretical possibility only, as there is not enough of antimatter around and chance of meeting it is vanishingly small in expanding Universe environment.

For anyone interested in subject it is worth to google about "Death by Entopy", or about "Thermal Death of Universe", which (at least IMO) is likely to be our final fate.
Given infinited time, we will only have expanding space with virtual particles popping in and out of existence (to satisfy Heisenberg Principle), and flooded with infinitely red shifted electromagnetical radiation and infinetely small ripples caused by gravity waves.

This space will certainly be free of cornucopians and doomers alike :)
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 16:29:36

this is a puzzlng thread, seahorse. It is a commonplace understanding that atoms form molecules, and complex organic molecules form under the right conditions. Why is it neccessary to postulate that atoms store information other than that implied by valence and physics? The big mystery is how the transition from complex organic molecules to the first living ones occurred. What am I missing here?
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby seahorse2 » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 16:49:33

PMS,

I want to know why atoms replicate anything? Why bother? Why not just float listlessly and do nothing but be an atom? Why come together, ultimately link together, form DNA and pass on traits and characteristics to "survive"? Survive what, a black hole? If they "fear" a black hole, this implies some form of intelligence.

But I do not believe fear of a black hole or some other cosmic destruction, is the best explanation. First, my body would be consumed in a black hole, their is no escape. I don't think atoms in our bodies, for example, are constantly taking on more atoms and shedding other atomes, forming DNA etc., out of a fear of a black hole - bc nothing escapes the black hole. It seems more plausible atoms bind and work together bc they carry a code or a memory and are acting pursuant to it, just like the computer experiments into evolution linked above show.

Surely, atoms can be destroyed, just like I could destroy a hard drive. But I'm suggesting something more than the atom, which is for lack of a better analogy simply a store or carrier of information. I'm suggesting that evolution, the fact that they do anything beyond just float listlessly as an individual atom, suggests that they carry in them an atomic memory or code, a set of rules, and are operating under that code, which tells them to start replicating as evolution demonstrates is occuring and as the computer and other cell experiments demonstrate.

We know they can store information, we know that information can be carried via photon, so if it can happen, and in fact, since computer science is attempting to do just that, why is it so hard to believe its not happening already, on a scale we haven't thought about?

It is quite possible that all atoms don't carry a memory or code, but that code or memory is or can be transferred through the universe via photons, which we know can transfer information, and which we know are travelling through the universe.

It seems that an atomic memory/code is a very logical simple explaination to observed evolutionary phenonema and answers some very basic questions.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 17:01:27

but, but, atoms don't replicate. Where did you get that from? They make up structures that do replicate if in living beings. Maybe you mean figuratively: they form complex entities that replicate, therefore "they" replicate. But they don't. Carbon atoms don't give birth to baby carbon atoms. It's no skin off of a carbon atom's nose if it's part of a DNA molecule or a chunk of graphite. The interesting stuff happens at a higher level, as an emergent property as an earlier poster put it. That's how I see it anyway.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby oowolf » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 17:09:39

It's not possible to construct a "coherent" model of such things using mammalian perceptual prejudices. The idea that a bunch of demented monkeys can "figure out" whats "really" going on is ludicrous. What's the shortest amount of time that can be? Something like 6.7 septillionths of a second? (I'm not a physicst), Isn't this the light distance between 2 adjacent protons? Anyway we cannot optically percieve an event that doesn't persist for about 1/20th of a second; so we can't even observe 99.999999999999999% of what's going on around us.

We don't have a clue what the Hell's going on--other than it's probably going to suck.

"Death: The cessation of a temporary confusion."
Can't recall who said it--Bierce? Mencken?
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby NEOPO » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 17:12:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'm')ammalian perceptual prejudices
:lol:

I smile and say "construct" or even "matrix" while the scientist frowns and begins to recite everything the western mind has come to realize about said subject to date :o

I got one for ya - Prior to the big bang - where was everything? :lol:

IMHO Raphael is correct in suggesting that this is science and religion becoming one .....once again.
Image
The Edmonton Swastikas, a Canadian womens' ice hockey team, c.1916.
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX
Top

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby oowolf » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 17:30:33

The universe is the "inside" of a black hole. Everything came here from the "other side" of the singularity.
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 17:42:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('oowolf', 'T')he universe is the "inside" of a black hole. Everything came here from the "other side" of the singularity.
which one? are there not many black holes - plural singularites, so to speak. 8)
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby oowolf » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 17:44:59

What's the connection between the dreaded swastika and Coca Cola? Click on "Look Closer".
http://americana.heritageauctions.com/c ... true#Photo
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby seahorse2 » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 17:48:56

PMS,

You are correct, I don't mean atoms replicate themselves, but come together to form structures that replicate, change, etc, just like the computer evolution programs, just like what we are witnessing in evolution.

Neopo,

No question in my mind that modern science and religion/philosophy are hopessly entangled. However, that doesn't or should stop us from asking questions and attempting to understand the world around us. As Thomas Paine said in his book, "The Age of Reason" in which he thoroughly debunked the Bible, he concluded by saying the proof of god is all around us, and that religion, the study of God, is simply trying to understand the universe.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: atomic "memory" or "code" theory of

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Fri 12 Jan 2007, 18:37:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', '
')It seems that an atomic memory/code is a very logical simple explaination to observed evolutionary phenonema and answers some very basic questions.

It is very difficult to comment on this from cosmological point of viev, but (at least according to theoretical physicists) there are 2 major possible scenarios.

1. The information is ALWAYS conserved. This motion suggest, that at the point of initial singularity all information allowing formation of atoms/particles as well as galaxies, stars, planets, chemicals, DNA, humans etc was already there (means it was not created at singularity point, but was available somehow anyway).
The same motion in physics is insisting, that black holes (and final singularities present there) will not destroy actual information, albeit after their formation & evaporation all this information will simply become unusable to anyone.
This viev is held for many of those, who work with quantum mechanics.
This is steaming from the fact, that no quantum mechanism allowing conversion of pure quantum states into mixed quantum states (or the opposite way) is known.
Such conversion would be an equivalent of destruction of information (or creation of it from nowhere, if conversion was run an opposite way).

2. Information is conserved, but with exception of singularity environment.
This option allows you to create arbitrary large amount of information in initial singularity event (Big Bang) and destroy it in final singularity event, or rather in the process of evaporation of this singularity.
Such singularities are in central areas of black holes. They are called final, because they are always in the future of any observer and time ends there.
Quantum Gravity Theory (which we do not have yet) would provide us answers about correctness of this assumption allowing creation/destruction of information in singularities environment.

NB. Big Bang (initial singularity) is called that way, because it can be only in your past, as time had begined there.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron