by BlisteredWhippet » Sat 30 Dec 2006, 02:43:15
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FilmShack', 'M')ayber I have no sence of irony, but I don't really understand what Blister is trying to say. Those people are sexy? Maybe it is an age thing, and I'm too old for the joke.
Do I have to hit you over the head with it? Sex sells. Men respond to sex appeal. Men are literally wired and conditioned to respond just because of this fact. Of course, you already know this.
You want to appeal to the "angels of our better nature". Sadly, these angels do not watch TV.
Think about it this way: Sexual transactionalism is why men built the world you live in. If you want men to deconstruct and rebuild it in the fashion you're suggesting, you have use a motivator at a similar level of power... and sex has no equal. Thats all.
As you can already see there are quite a few eager beavers here ready to get started and what exactly have you shown us? Breastuses. Sad but true. There isn't a "show" here at all.
The female response is all "high fives, sister". The male response is, "Duhhh... your so pretty".
Connect that fact with the reality that women simply aren't at a place in our society where light construction is something they will do. In other words, Ms. Vally hasn't completed her public works project integrating the sexual division of labor yet as far as I can tell, and on the scale shown below, is simply going to move viewers from group 3 to group 1.
All this means is that your best bet is to address all possible markets:
1. Women who will pick up power tools. Check. Done. They might bitch and kvetch about what you wear, but they really don't care. They make up their own minds about things like chicken coops, and will appreciate you as an equal in any case.
2. Men who will pick up power tools. They have doubts. They are skeptical. They will not pay attention. Wait- you make "sexy time" with camera- voila! You have their attention. Then, man make chicken coop like man make fire. Nice. Then slaughter chicken and make roast chicken. Good. Interesting. Use knife, good. Make fire. Perhaps drink some beer. You are attractive, hold attention. Thats memorable.
3. Women who will not pick up power tools when they can easily get a man to do it. This group will look at you like you're an idiot. For one, your task is something any competent woman should be able to get her man to do for them. Ignoring for a minute that you're basically competing with a thing called a "restaurant" or "grocery store" as supplier of resource called "chicken", you basically should present this lifestyle as good or even better than the alternative, however you feel that is defined, as a woman, with the intention of piquing a woman's interest to the point where she decides that this is the direction she should go in life, at which point she will take over for you and oversee the construction as she directs a nearby man to do it (who will happily or unhappily do it, depending on various other factors.) In this example, you are selling the idea of having this stuff made. This is why you DON'T do everything yourself. You hype a project, and bring in the contractor/lackey/man, etc. This gives 1st world women an image they can
relate to. They don't know power tools and building stuff- thats what men are
for. Your average woman will look at you as if you are a spectacle. And spectacles are common.
Not having seen Ms. Vally's show, I will venture to guess that her visible role is less hands-on, and more delegatory (at least in how its cut). If you cut it right, it will all look seamless. Build coop, slaughter chicken, delegate authority, be sexy, make lifestyle pledge. With a balanced cut, each audience will cherry pick their attractors. You also have to speak to each group in a way that does not "Mock" them, like I mock them.
