by greenworm » Sat 23 Dec 2006, 14:34:19
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you could show that prior to any bad behavior she was an ardent critic of the war it might lend credibility to your argument.
What argument?
You have provided an "if", but nowhere do I see a "then". Causality, for me to prove whatever theorem you suggest, then I am gonna need the argument. Let me know what the "then" is and we'll see what we come up with.
I guess I'll have to try and gather your argument.
You said: If you could show that prior to any bad behavior she was an ardent critic of the war
then She seems pretty lucid. (If this is not your argument please let me know, it isn't exactly clear)
Well, lucid is defined as easily understood.
So, by your reasoning, we can summarize that a person who is an ardent critic of the war and who has shown no bad behavior before becoming an ardent critic of the war, then they are easily understood.
False! I am an ardent critic of the war who has exhibited bad behavior before, however, I am lucid. My wife has read my argument and she said it was easily understood.
Lastly, a person with a name that appears jewish in nature should not speak about an african american lady as "big momma". That is called rascism since there are stereotypes of black women being large. I figure I would let you know that so you can edit it since this hopefully wasn't your intention.