Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Recent Video on Peak Oil

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby kokoda » Sun 10 Dec 2006, 17:55:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'w')itnesses also said they saw no planes ?
which are you to believe

plus that plane in the 2nd video, the phatom F4 is TINY compared to a huge 747. If you want a basis for comparsion, theres a lot more wreckage of planes recovered from the world trade centres. They didn't vaporise to dust. And if we are supposed to believe it vaporised to dust, why the hell was there an exit hole 3 rings in. Surely there must have been some plane wreckage there ? lol ...

Perhaps you could give us the names of some of those witnesses. Personally I prefer to believe the witnesses that actually exist.

The 757 (not 747) is bigger which explains why it managed to penetrate the building. It still disintergrated however.

The WTC was not structurally as strong as the pentagon.
User avatar
kokoda
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu 24 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby Armageddon » Sun 10 Dec 2006, 17:58:23

how did it disintegrate, but make it through all those rings of reinforcement ? It cant do both. And all the passengers ''disintegrated" too ?
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby NEOPO » Sun 10 Dec 2006, 18:25:38

All of Kokoda's post's to date

Have a look - he is still very young with a recent born-on date so it is not very difficult to compile an early profile.

911+PO = really really bothers this person kokoda.
Sorry as I cannot help but analyze people a bit.

Fucking weird man very very weird.
Spooks er whatever ya want to call them.
The old gaurd perhaps - people with a vested interest that the truth does not come out perhaps...

Forum spies?
Disinfo specialists?
What shall we call them?
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby kokoda » Sun 10 Dec 2006, 20:25:04

Damn ... I have been busted.

Yes I admit it .. I flew the aircraft that fired the missile at the pentagon.

It was a tough mission. I had to come in low and fast releasing my tomahawk cruise missile at less than 500 meters. I then had to execute a high G pull out just managing to clear the top of the building.

Next I had to release a canaster of nerve gas which caused all of the witnesses to suffer temporary memory loss wiping out any memory of the aircraft pulling up at the last second.


Of course that was the easy part of the mission. Parachuting out of the plane just before it hit the first WTC tower was way more difficult.
User avatar
kokoda
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu 24 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby Armageddon » Sun 10 Dec 2006, 20:27:58

Forum spies?
Disinfo specialists?
What shall we call them?

==========================

nope, just your typical sheep
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby zberry » Sun 10 Dec 2006, 22:25:53

Regarding the Pentagon, this is a building with more cameras on it than probably any other building on earth. Literally covered with cameras. Yet the only two videos released, including recent DoubleTree video, do not show a plane.
If the govt wanted to clear things up, they would release enough of their video to show us what happened. We all know they have the videos. Very suspicious that five years on, and we still haven't seen a clear video of what hit the Pentagon. Oh yeah, whatever it was, just happened to hit the accounting offices the day after Rumsfield announced 2 trillion dollars unaccounted for. But I'm sure that's just another coincidence, huh?
User avatar
zberry
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue 21 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby dukey » Sun 10 Dec 2006, 23:31:17

apparantly also the pentagon has a missile defense system, meaning anything which isn't transmitting that days friendly code gets shot down automatically ..

i can't find any info on this, but if true, which it probably is, means theres no way that flight 77 could have crashed there anyway, unless it was a military plane.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby kokoda » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 01:38:39

Except of course none of the witnesses actually mentioned a missile being fired.

At least the possibility that there may have been a plane involved has finally started to sink into your consciousness.

We maybe able to reverse that conspiracy theory brainwashing yet.
User avatar
kokoda
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu 24 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby Armageddon » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 02:09:22

if you cant tell by the pictures and proof Dukey has presented that there is no way in hell a plane hit the pentagon, then you are truly either brain dead or ignoring the facts.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby Carlhole » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 02:34:52

The government could immediately clear up any problems people have with the Pentagon crash by releasing the wreckage remains (which the Commissioners have said it has).

They could release all the other evidence such as the Sheraton Hotel video, any other videos from cameras all over the Pentagon.

Generally, they could be a whole lot forthcoming with evidence for the public's assurance.

It's not as if all aircraft wrecks are off-limits; TWA 800's wreckage was very available for inspection. In that case, the government was most eager that an open investigation took place.

Why won't the government release the wreckage of Flight 77 for inspection?
Carlhole
 

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby Armageddon » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 02:40:19

why do you think ? Because it will ruin their party. Pissing in the punch bowl so to speak.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby GreenMarine » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 02:46:05

I just want to say I have been reading this entire thread. kokoda has all the counter answers from a typical sheeple DisInfo site. Plato best describes why people wont except the truth with The Allegory of the Cave.

http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/cave.htm

This is also what the movie The Matrix was based off of.







PO is why 9/11 happened. 9/11 got us into Iraq. Iraq was planed to be our next supply.
User avatar
GreenMarine
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri 01 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Orlando

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby kokoda » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 02:49:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'i')f you cant tell by the pictures and proof Dukey has presented that there is no way in hell a plane hit the pentagon, then you are truly either brain dead or ignoring the facts.

If you won't believe the evidence of 45 witnesses over Dukey's extremely misleading "evidence" then you are truly either brain dead or ignoring the facts.
User avatar
kokoda
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu 24 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby Armageddon » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 02:57:52

pictures and proof do not lie. People do. I have also heard witnesses say they didnt see a plane. I have heard witnesses say it was a smaller plane. Thats why I look at the facts . The fact is, a plane could not have hit the pentagon. The hole was too small, planes dont disintegrate, and planes cant pierce through all those layers of reinforced concrete walls and leave a hole in the other side.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby kokoda » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 06:26:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GreenMarine', 'I') just want to say I have been reading this entire thread. kokoda has all the counter answers from a typical sheeple DisInfo site. Plato best describes why people wont except the truth with The Allegory of the Cave.

http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/cave.htm

This is also what the movie The Matrix was based off of.


PO is why 9/11 happened. 9/11 got us into Iraq. Iraq was planed to be our next supply.

The thing is that I have provided counter answers and backed it up with evidence.

I haven't tried to dodge or ignore the facts like armegeddon and dukey. When I see a shadow on the wall I will not make any assumptions about it until I have had a chance to investigate. When I see enough collaborating evidence I will form an opinion ... not before.

Not so armegeddon and dukey. Read some of the crap they have been posting ... its embarrassing.

Dukey doesn't know the difference between an 880,000lb Jumbo and a 250,000lb 757. He claims that a bunch of witnesses to the 911 attack on the pentagon didn't see an aircraft ... although he can't actually produce any names.

Even though he can't produce a shred of evidence he claims that the Pentagon has a surface to air missile system.

He shows carefully cropped closeups and deliberately misleading photographs in his desperate attempt to fabricate evidence.

Armaggeddon is in complete denial. He claims aircraft can't completely disintergrate in spite of the evidence to the contrary being right here.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGE ... mpact2.wmv

As a miliitary man you know phantoms were one tough old bird. If it can disintergrate so completely then any aircraft could.

He tried to pass off as evidence the words of some reporter who didn't even witness the attack and yet ignores the testimony of people who were actually there.

http://www.cnn.com/2001/CAREER/trends/0 ... atoday.wav

And then he turns around and calls all of those witnesses liers ... well unless they are all telepathic as well then it is a real coincidence that they all happen to be telling the same lie.

And NEOPO ... well he is a bit out of his depth ... he just blusters ... hasn't really said anything of note.
User avatar
kokoda
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu 24 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby kokoda » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 06:50:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'p')ictures and proof do not lie.


What ... never heard of photoshop ... pictures are about the least reliable evidence there is.

Proof doesn't lie but you have yet to produce anything that even remotely resembles "proof".

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'p')ictures and proof do not lie. People do.


So by definition then I guess you are also lying.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'I') have heard witnesses say it was a smaller plane

So you admit it was a plane ... at least we are making some progress now.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', ' ')planes dont disintegrate


what an idiotic claim.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGE ... mpact2.wmv

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', ' ')The hole was too small


It was 90 ft across ... plenty big enough.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', ' ') and planes cant pierce through all those layers of reinforced concrete walls and leave a hole in the other side.
What ... got some evidence of this? ... or is it just based on your years of experience in air crash investigation.
User avatar
kokoda
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 440
Joined: Thu 24 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby dukey » Mon 11 Dec 2006, 09:30:45

some people are just walking around with fingers in their ears and their eyes covered

see no evil hear no evil

The amount of inconsistancies in the 911 story is simply rediculous. Like norad giving 3 totally different accounts of what happened that day. All 3 can not be correct. Like why was dick cheyney running drills that day that simulated fake radar blips on the screen and fake hyjackings. So the 'terrorists' knew on that day that these drills were happening ? It just goes on and on and on.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby Lighthouse » Tue 12 Dec 2006, 00:13:14

Its really hard to stay out of 9/11 discussions if you see this obvious massive lack of understanding of basic science, physics in particular ...

You are all familiar with DU=Q+W, or at least, being on PO.OM should have heard about it.

But when it comes to 9/11 you tend to ignore it.

But maybe you don't even understand the full implications of this and can't even imagine what that all means in realty.
I am a sarcastic cynic. Some say I'm an asshole. Now that we have that out of the way ...
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby NEOPO » Tue 12 Dec 2006, 02:10:52

Like I care to sit and sift through everything I have most definately already sifted through many times......
What? you think we just jumped in bed with 911 truth and that was all she wrote.....

It amazes me that you people have even gotten this far.
How did you find Peak oil?
Better yet how did you manage to look past the OFFICIAL story to realize that PO was the truth?
Yeah thats the best question because I can post and rehash about 10,000 links that "prove" Peak Oil is a scam, lie, conspiracy etc etc.

AMAZING I tell ya freakin amazing............

Here's my proof:

General States Plane Did not Hit Pentagon

JFK 2 - The Bush Connection

Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime 1.0

Alex Jones - 9-11 Road to Tyranny 17-21

Jim Marrs: 9/11 Truth in 10 Minutes

9/11 Press For Truth

911 - David Ray Griffin in DC 9-24 2005

David Shayler on 911

Improbable Collapse : The Demolition of our Republic

Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut

THE TRUTH & LIES OF 9/11

the history of war

BYU professor claims WTC collapse was controlled demolition

911 blogger dot com

My list is about 500 links long so I just dug out some gems and posted them.......
500 links that I have watched, read and studied rather thoroughly.
now what do you have?
What have you watched, read and studied thoroughly before coming here and trying to spoon feed us some bullshit????????

As if someone has to be an expert in many fields to be able to piece this plot together.
Reality?
Your illusion of reality.
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Recent Video on Peak Oil

Unread postby Lighthouse » Tue 12 Dec 2006, 02:19:20

Why do I think you do not even have the slightest clue what

DU=Q+W

stands for ???
I am a sarcastic cynic. Some say I'm an asshole. Now that we have that out of the way ...
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests