Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Thermal Depolymerization Thread (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby Tanada » Fri 27 Oct 2006, 06:39:20

The good thing about TD is it can be used to refine heavy oils into diesel 4, which is still a popular shipping fuel, and they also claim they can convert Lignite to oil more efficiently than Fisher-Tropsch, but I want to see proof of that one before I beleive it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby MD » Fri 27 Oct 2006, 07:34:08

We will always generate waste, and that waste must be processed.

The most environmentally friendly method of waste handling looks something like this:

Waste disposal should be very expensive by mandate, in order to reduce frivolous behavior.

Thorough recycling of inorganics follow, again by mandate, and at no cost to the consumer.

Organics are composted.

What little remains, go ahead and burn, preferably with plasma to minimize the pile of poisonous material left over.

No matter what you do, the whole process is an energy sink, but it is far better than covering it all with dirt.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby Frank » Fri 27 Oct 2006, 10:42:40

I agree with MD. But, we can't even get a national bottle bill in this country! This was discussed in Congress five years ago but got lost in the shuffle after 9/11. Most of the aluminum in beverage cans is still landfilled. What a waste. We can't even do the easy things correctly.
User avatar
Frank
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed 15 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Maine/Nova Scotia

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby OneLoneClone » Fri 27 Oct 2006, 11:03:59

Introducing

the Soylent Hummer

Advanced new Thermal depol hybrid engine! Runs on terrorists, [s]liberals[/s] enemy combatants, and your own liposuction waste!

Fight terrorism, secular humanism, and overpopulation while you commute and look good doing it!

Composting is for Luddites! Thermal Depol vs the World! Yeah!
OneLoneClone
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri 07 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby Veritas » Mon 30 Oct 2006, 12:17:19

Sounds like nobody actually has any numbers or evidence against this technology, but rather a fervent commitment to doomsday scenarios.

Human beings have and always will produce waste, oil or no oil.

To me the questions that should be answered regarding TDP are:

1. What are the "Waste products" that can be used? (is it quite literally anything organic?)

2. How much waste yields how much fuel?

3. What is the cost/feasibility of building TDP facilities, what size of region is optimum for providing a stream of input and capturing economies of scale?

I mean, can you toss in all the junk from your attic into a TDP vat and get 4 barrels of oil out? Could we take the vast majority of whats in landfill sites (and what is currently destined for those sites) today and turn that into oil?

The example always relates to the turkey facility, but my understanding is TDP is not a Turkey into Oil recipe, but an Anything Organic into oil recipe. So it is not reliant on a butterball factory to operate, and debunks that hinge on explaining why mass produced turkey will not exist in the future are fallacious.

Ideally you could give a scenario of a current community and the waste it generates as is, and talk about how much of that waste could be changed into fuel, and compare that to the current fuel consumption of the community.

I find people on this board are real quick to show how each individual alternative cannot replace oil, but reluctant to talk about an aggregate of alternative energies paired with conservation efforts.

Yes we need 10 000 nuclear plants if nuclear replaced oil. Or 200 000 km squared of PV panels, or thousands upon thousands of acres for biomass/corn. But what is a real scenario of photovoltaic + wind + biodiesel + TDP + hydroelectric + everything else. What is the future shortfall of energy if we add all of the alternatives (in viable quantities) together, how much could be met by reducing demand through conservation, and could the remainder be made up by nuclear?

I hear all these polemic examples, but not many realistic ones. No wind won't replace oil, not even close, but how much could it replace? And how much could PV replace? How much could TDP replace? And when we add it all up whats our shortfall? Are we at 50% of oil or 5% of oil or 80%?

I was right there with everyone seeing a huge problem coming down, but the real problem is nobody is talking about energy in aggregate. They pick one technology and show how it can't replace oil, rather than talking about how much it could provide and then adding it with other sources to see where we might be at.
User avatar
Veritas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun 01 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby nocar » Mon 30 Oct 2006, 13:30:31

Rich countries, and rich people create lots of waste, poor countries and poor people create little waste. If you are hungry most of the time, you will eat the turkey parts that today are waste, like the liver, heart, gizzard, perhaps lungs. And you might lick your plate clean. If you are really poor, you will not throw out your old furniture, but repair it, or perhaps put it to other uses. Wooden things that are seriously without any other value can always end up in the fireplace to provide heat.
In Sweden (rich country, lots of waste) lots of waste end up in incinerators that provide district heating. It is an efficiency thing, rather than a technology, but it means that we already use the waste, and we will have less waste to heat houses when the peak oil effects really sets in, some decades into the future.

You can never make more energy out of any material than the energy that it contains. All organic material contains some energy, and will burn if dry. Making heat directly is probable the most efficient way of utilizing the energy (besides composting or feeding pigs or chickens, if we are talking leftovers). I believe it is possible to make car fuel out of many organic things but the process is complicated and you lose energy in the many transformations. Most car fuel (about 70-80 percent from my understanding) end up as heat anyway. Only about 20 percent of the energy content of gasoline actually drives the car.

So: After peak oil when most of us will get much poorer, our stream of waste will evaporate to a trickle. And then, when energy becomes scarce, why waste energy on driving cars and aeroplanes?
nocar
nocar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri 05 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby JRP3 » Mon 30 Oct 2006, 20:38:41

One thing they found is that while they can get oil from anything the reality is that different feedstocks take different processing parameters so it's most efficient to setup for one type, (turkey guts in this case), and you need a steady supply of it.
Also, the plant needs to be near the supply or transport costs kill the efficiency.
As long as we have a large supply of crap to feed it TD probably can work.
But when resources become limited we won't have so much readily available "fuel" for TD, and again, the transport costs become astronomical.
User avatar
JRP3
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby Veritas » Fri 03 Nov 2006, 16:57:51

Update - I was reading the bit on TDP in Kunstler's Long Emergency and he gives a few numbers...

TDP has "85% efficiency", meaning that it takes 15 BTU's to run the process for each 100 BTU's of energy produced.

One problem seems to be that its not as simple as just dumping a bunch of waste in and cooking it into oil. Different waste requires different processing. So a plant has to be setup to process a certain way. I'd imagine the same plant could be changed to different temperature/pressure to cook various types of inputs, but sorting those inputs in the first place would be an issue.



While there's no citation or math behind this estimate, he states:

"Even if all the garbage produced every day in the US under current conditions was converted into oil by TDP it would not amoutn to even 5% of our current consumption of oil."

Which answers a bit of what I wanted to know. The best-case-scenario is that TDP could provide 5% of current oil consumption. And this best-case scenario is not likely to be reached or even approximated, given the nature of the inputs required (the infamous turkey example).
User avatar
Veritas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun 01 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby zoidberg » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 19:06:23

As I read somewhere else the best way to look at TDP is as a high tech recycling method. Not an energy source, so please dont get too hung up on the eating shit analogies.

Personally I think that setting up a few plants to work on raw sewage is a good way to process the damn stuff and get something useful from it. As things stand now we process the stuff and get no useful byproducts.(well maybe we get to avoid cholera, but you know what I mean).

On the same note reprocessing our landfills will surely become viable industry down the road.

To sum up TDP - not a cure or even an acutal oil source, but a good way to stretch our resources a little. That is assuming we can get it to work in an economical fashion. Which we cant yet. So I'd have to say its a nonstarter, but potentially useful.
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america

Re: Thermal Depolymerization

Postby zoidberg » Tue 14 Nov 2006, 23:53:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'Y')es zoilberg the analogy might be closer to a shit-powered toilet paper.

TDP is a slight mitigation for the waste produced by our industrial food system. In a more sustainable, localized, and decentralized world the turkey poop would fertilize the garden and the guts would feed the chickens/pigs.

Yes, well TDP can handle more than the turkey guts, which I agree have other, better uses.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_depolymerization

This page has a table indicating how TDP performs with different inputs(supposedly I'd guess you'd optimize the plant for certain types of inputs). Thats why I mentioned sewage specifically - I dont know of any uses for sewage - in fact it has to treated in what I presume is an energy intensive process to prevent it from spreading disease and fouling the environment.

The unhappy assesment though is that TDP doesnt really help peak oil, but that it produces valuble oil as a result of processing waste is what makes it a lovely recycling technology.
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america

Update: Thermal Depolymerization Process

Postby pup55 » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 22:20:13

The long time viewers of PO.com no doubt remember the Thermal Depolymerization plant in Carthage MO, designed to take "offal" from a nearby turkey processing plant, and turn it into crude oil. So as to keep an ever watchful PO.com eye on this development, here is an update:

As a reminder, the operation was discussed in detail in the following threads:

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic505-0-asc-75.html

http://peakoil.com/fortopic25084.html+depolymerization

http://peakoil.com/fortopic2189.html

To summarize, this plant was constructed out in the country in the 2004 time frame, and had two problems: Tyson refused to give away the feedstock (turkey guts), preferring instead to sell it to someone who was using it for feed, and the odor from the plant was so excessive that the townspeople could not stand it.

Update: the plant, now operating under the name Renewable Environmental Resources:

RES Website

....has made #6 on the list of Top 10 stories of 2006, in the Carthage Press, the town newspaper:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n June, the state Attorney General's Office and Renewable Environmental Solutions in Jasper County Circuit Court to settle a lawsuit for six Notice of Violations for alleged odor at a penalty of $100,000.


Carthage Press

The CWT website has the following cheery story as of May:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')hanging World Technologies’ waste-to-oil subsidiary, Renewable Environmental Solutions, shipped more than 250,000 gallons (6000 barrels) of renewable diesel fuel in April 2006, representing approximately 30% of the plant’s capacity. The plant is expected to achieve full capacity in the near future.


CWT Website

So apparently, as of May or so these guys were still functioning, but I believe the original intent was to turn the offal into a crude oil equivalent, so they may have retrofit their process to produce diesel, which makes sense because it is higher value-added. Perhaps this also partially took care of the stink.

Anyway, it remains to be seen if these guys will ever make a dime at this. We will continue to follow this story periodically just for the pure joy of seeing what it takes to get an alternative energy process off the ground.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Update: Thermal Depolymerization Process

Postby fluffy » Mon 08 Jan 2007, 05:34:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '
')Anyway, it remains to be seen if these guys will ever make a dime at this. We will continue to follow this story periodically just for the pure joy of seeing what it takes to get an alternative energy process off the ground.


My take on this has always been that the general idea of a process that takes waste material containing hydrocarbon chains (Turkey fat, old tyres, waste plastics and waste cooking oil, for example) and extracts those chains into a usable fuel is valid. For the relevant feedstocks it should work OK. However..

(a) As given in the post above, you are going to get nasty by-products due to the sulphur and nitrogen containing byproducts. This will require extra processing.

(b) The actual amount of available feedstock simply isn't that big. How many turkeys did you eat today?

If you can turn the Hydrocarbon chains in the feedstock into diesel, turn the sulphur and nitrogen into various sulphates and nitrates to use as fertiliser, and everything else into Co2, you will have a reasonably useful recycling process which is better than sticking the stuff in landfill. But it isn't going to change the world.
User avatar
fluffy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon 26 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Update: Thermal Depolymerization Process

Postby Doly » Mon 08 Jan 2007, 10:29:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('fluffy', '
')(b) The actual amount of available feedstock simply isn't that big. How many turkeys did you eat today?


True. But then, not that much fuel is needed to run strictly necessary vehicles.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Update: Thermal Depolymerization Process

Postby Kingcoal » Mon 08 Jan 2007, 16:12:36

Sure, turkey crude is cool, but as with many, many other "alternatives," I doubt it has a real EROEI above 1. Turkeys will go extinct long before we ever even get to a billion barrels.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Update: Thermal Depolymerization Process

Postby fluffy » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 06:40:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'S')ure, turkey crude is cool, but as with many, many other "alternatives," I doubt it has a real EROEI above 1. Turkeys will go extinct long before we ever even get to a billion barrels.


Depends on how you measure EROEI.

Given that the source material should be 'free' (i.e it would normally be thrown away, so we can discount any energy used in making it in the first place), then the process should be able to generate enough energy to run itself and hence have a positive EROEI.
User avatar
fluffy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon 26 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: Thermal Depolymerisation Process

Postby piper » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 07:26:43

This process seems to be up and running now.

Fractional depolymerization

http://www.globalfinest.com/tech

Worth a look
User avatar
piper
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue 27 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Thermal Depolymerisation Process

Postby Veritas » Fri 24 Aug 2007, 15:55:06

Isn't TDP just one big BS scam? I read the article there by Paul Palmer, PhD Chemist - sorry I dont have the link copied but its the mindfully.org one earlier in the thread.

From page 3:

"Do you know what is being described here? A mountain of turkey guts, conssiting of protein, water, grease, saccharides, bones, and more is being subjected to steam. Out of all this, the grease is melted, steamed out, and collected. All the rest of it is left over. Some protein may be actually depolymerized leaving amino acids or just protein fragmetns. Most everything else is probably unchanged. As a pure guess, I would guess that 90% of the mass passes thru without significant change. Feathers, bone, dirt, are not going to be affected and if they are, or were, their breakdown products don't even resemble oil (excuse me, Texas light crude).

Let me speak to the attitude of marvel you surround this trivial operation with. This is something I learned to do from my mother and my guess is you did too. How many times have I put a turkey or chicken carcass into a pot of boiling water, cooled it down, and skimmed off the grease? Is this a revolutionary technological breakthrough in your book?" Paul Palmer.

What I've seen:

1. The only operational plant uses turkey guts/offal.
2. No scientific study has ever been done on how TDP "works".
3. The plants are strictly off-limits to the public, journalists, etc and the process is a "safely guarded secret".

Despite the claim that they can turn "garbage" into oil, is it not true that all we know is that they skimmed the grease off of boiled turkey?
User avatar
Veritas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun 01 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

Green Power Catalytic Depolymerization

Postby bmcics » Thu 06 Sep 2007, 17:12:29

Looks good, they are selling these to landfills the claim is the ability to process all landfill waste into high quality diesel fuel

Watch videos

Website
User avatar
bmcics
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed 05 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron