Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby Lokutus » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 17:07:16

in the Peak Oil living room.

Just ignore it so that it goes away.

What's is this "elephant"?

It's the fact that gas prices at the pump have plummeted almost a dollar in some areas since summer.

Cue standard kneejerk reaction:

Bush and his Saudi pals are manipulating the market for the lection.

Oh really? How can Bush and Rove manipulate the market this much if we are to take seriously the claims that the global supply is already maxed out at 84.5 mbpd as demand skyrockets thanks to the Chinese?

I can believe a $.25 drop but a dollar?

Something is wrong here.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby AgentR » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 17:18:33

You think this is fun?? Wait a few more years down the road when maximal demand can force the price all the way to $6 / gallon; and then collapse, causing the price to plummet back to $3 / gallon.

Its jitter. Going forward, the greater the ability of demand to briefly surpass production rate, the more violent one can expect this jitter to become.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby Lokutus » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 17:40:00

Someone please remind me again just what the difference is between the Peak Oil Doomsday Cult and all the other doomsday cults.

I've forgotten.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby NEOPO » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 18:07:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'S')omeone please remind me again just what the difference is between the Peak Oil Doomsday Cult and all the other doomsday cults.

I've forgotten.


Some of us are going to survive? ;-)
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 18:14:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'S')omeone please remind me again just what the difference is between the Peak Oil Doomsday Cult and all the other doomsday cults.

I've forgotten.


Oil production is a measurable phenomenon?
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby Lokutus » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 18:35:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'S')omeone please remind me again just what the difference is between the Peak Oil Doomsday Cult and all the other doomsday cults.

I've forgotten.


Oil production is a measurable phenomenon?


Yes, but it all depends on whose measurements you believe.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 19:05:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'S')omeone please remind me again just what the difference is between the Peak Oil Doomsday Cult and all the other doomsday cults.

I've forgotten.


Oil production is a measurable phenomenon?


Yes, but it all depends on whose measurements you believe.


Lokutus, The price of gasoline at the pump can be manipulated up or down a fair degree by distributors and retailers. It's clear that with consolidation in the industry, that price manipulation would be pretty easy. They are likely taking an intentional hit right now, to help the Bushies stay in power.

The price per barrel is driven by speculation, and there seems to be confidence that oil isn't as scarce as some on this board seem to think. This doesn't mean much though, other than people can be mistaken, tend to act in herds, etc...

At this point, though, it certainly doesn't look like we're in for a geological shock of epic proportions, ending in a die off--don't buy that for a minute.

This site might be useful to understand pricing in oil industry.

http://www.oligopolywatch.com/2004/06/12.html
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 19:41:57

Its very simple, Lokutus.

In the price of a gallon of gasoline, there is the "actual" value of a gallon of gasoline, plus taxes & fees, and then the speculation premium. That speculation premium is valued anywhere between the ACTUAL value (the price will not fall below ACTUAL value) and what market speculators think the price will be TOMORROW (and no one knows what that will be).

So if gasoline falls by $1/gallon in any period, you can be sure that this is within the speculative price range. Gasoline certainly isn't worth LESS than what it currently is, but it might significantly rise TOMORROW, and no one knows exactly what that figure is.

We can certainly draw inferences about the trend in ACTUAL price by looking at past performance. For example, if oil is $65/bbl today and is considered by many the lowest possible price (the cellar) off its ceiling of $88, and just 6 years ago it was $25/bbl., then we might guess that the ACTUAL VALUE of gas is quite a bit higher than it was a year ago. Of course a couple million speculators might be wrong, and just gouging the consumer, which is certainly possible given the closed, non-democratic nature of oil companies and organizations.

Think like a speculator. Do you think demand will increase? If demand increases, will supply go up? Fill in the blanks.

Your doubt about PO outcomes is natural. You look at certain specific indicators, and use this data for a gut-check. I would argue that gas prices are a poor guage for gut-check, partially because the price is highly speculative. Stop thinking like a amateur loser investor who picks stock by looking at prices. Winning stockpickers look at fundamentals.

You want to be a winner, don't you Lokutus?
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby AgentR » Wed 25 Oct 2006, 02:23:55

Yall might find this stuff a whole lot less confusing if you looked at it from the point of view of the US and China on the same team.

Do the Patriot Acts and the MCA look like the US is trying to be different than China, or does it look like the US is trying to become more like China? Hmmm???

Same team guys. Why are we not filling our SPR while China is filling theirs? We aren't competing, we're working in concert. Dollars outbound, resources inbound. We enforce subservience in the Mideast, the Chinese enforce subservience in Africa.

Whose feelings and interests have we stomped on more over the last six years, China, or Europe?
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 25 Oct 2006, 02:36:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'Y')all might find this stuff a whole lot less confusing if you looked at it from the point of view of the US and China on the same team.

Do the Patriot Acts and the MCA look like the US is trying to be different than China, or does it look like the US is trying to become more like China? Hmmm???

Same team guys. Why are we not filling our SPR while China is filling theirs? We aren't competing, we're working in concert. Dollars outbound, resources inbound. We enforce subservience in the Mideast, the Chinese enforce subservience in Africa.

Whose feelings and interests have we stomped on more over the last six years, China, or Europe?


Try Russia and China on the same team. China needs to be assured of oil imports so will cozy up to Russia, not US. Read this article.

Emerging Russian Giant--Asia Times

"In recent years, major attention has been paid to the emergence of a Chinese economic colossus. What is generally missing in these discussions is the fact that China will not be able to emerge as a truly independent global power over the coming decade unless it is able to solve two strategic vulnerabilities - its growing dependence on energy imports for its economic growth and its inability to pose a credible nuclear deterrence to a US nuclear first strike.

Russia is the one remaining power which still has sufficient military deterrence potential in its strategic nuclear arsenal, and is expanding same, as well as abundant energy to make a credible counterweight to global US military and political primacy. A Eurasian combination of China and Russia and allied Eurasian states, essentially the states in and around the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), do present a potential counterweight to unilateral US dominance. An understanding of recent Russian developments in this light is essential to understand US foreign policy as well as global politics at present."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HJ25Ag01.html
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby Loki » Wed 25 Oct 2006, 02:45:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'S')omeone please remind me again just what the difference is between the Peak Oil Doomsday Cult and all the other doomsday cults.

I've forgotten.


Nikes are optional.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon
Top

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby AgentR » Wed 25 Oct 2006, 23:09:02

threadbear, I know the arguments on both sides of this discussion about whether its China&Russia, or China&US... I do disagree with that conclusion, but I understand that others may hold that opposing view in good faith.

The problem I have with the Russia&China argument is that it assumes a steady state with regard to Russian export production. Its not happening yet, but I'd suspect that Russia does not intend to be an exporter of oil for all that much longer. They've paid off their external liabilities, they've expanded their internal infrastructure, and they're beginning to (re?)build a modern industrial capacity. I see them doing the same as the US did, switching to a heavy industrial economy, and eventually using all or almost all of their oil and gas internally. Ten years from now, they will not be exporting millions of barrels of oil to China or anywhere else.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 26 Oct 2006, 00:34:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ') It's clear that with consolidation in the industry, that price manipulation would be pretty easy. They are likely taking an intentional hit right now, to help the Bushies stay in power.


Utter hogwash!

Where does this nonsense schooling of the spot market and oil futures come from?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 26 Oct 2006, 00:39:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ') At this point, though, it certainly doesn't look like we're in for a geological shock of epic proportions, ending in a die off--don't buy that for a minute.


No?

Since when has any species in overshoot avoided a die-off when the phantom carrying capacity food/energy source depleted?

Hmmm?

Or are we above nature and not subject to it's laws?

At the current 8% decline trend we are seeing, that cuts oil production 50% in less than 9 years.

Connect the dots.

I'd call 50% cut in less than 9 years quite "a geological shock of epic proportions."
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby mekrob » Thu 26 Oct 2006, 00:49:55

8%? I've never seen that. I have seen 5% which seems more realistic. Besides, that is before new fields and new projects are added. We obviously aren't declining overall at 8% or even 5%. If we were and we knew it, then I don't think we'd be spending time on here. We're still holding strong at 84-85 mbpd and will probably increase in the next few years, and most likely stay at or above current levels.

You also have to keep in mind that oil provides 40% of our energy use, not 100%. So even a 50% drop-off in oil is only 20% overall (nothing to be happy about, but it's manageable initially). NG and coal are still set to increase, further mitigating the immediate effects of PO.

I'm not saying that the population collapse won't happen, but I am saying that there most likely will not be a "die-off", as in hundreds of millions dying in the streets and deserts all over the world directly after PO. I see the population collapse coming from resource wars and simply the lowering of the population generationally (the elders will die while the youth will not reproduce as much as it would take away their own resources, thus a 'natural' decline).
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby AgentR » Thu 26 Oct 2006, 01:02:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'I')'d call 50% cut in less than 9 years quite "a geological shock of epic proportions."


Do you honestly believe the world will be below 80mbpd production in five years?

That'd certainly be proof of a peak. I don't think its very likely though.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 26 Oct 2006, 01:05:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', '8')%? I've never seen that.


Then you haven't been reading. Look in Depletion Modeling for Exxon 8% decline.

Currently, existing fields are declining at 4 to 5% with a trend toward 8% with some mature fields showing 14%.

We don't know what the decline rate will be.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou also have to keep in mind that oil provides 40% of our energy use, not 100%. So even a 50% drop-off in oil is only 20% overall (nothing to be happy about, but it's manageable initially).


That has got to be one of the top most ridiculous statements I've seen in two years on here. LOL!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')G and coal are still set to increase, further mitigating the immediate effects of PO.


While increasing global warming and contributing nothing meaninglful to the liquids fuels demand set to increase 40% by 2025. NG and coal will not mitigate anything unless we crash course that mitigation 10 to 20 years pre-peak.

You think PO is not until 2016 to 2027 and that the crash course will start any day now?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m not saying that the population collapse won't happen, but I am saying that there most likely will not be a "die-off", as in hundreds of millions dying in the streets and deserts all over the world directly after PO.



And I don't know of anyone credible who posits that there will be such a die-off as you just described.. I have written extensively on this. Do a search.
Last edited by MonteQuest on Thu 26 Oct 2006, 01:14:41, edited 1 time in total.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 26 Oct 2006, 01:12:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'I')'d call 50% cut in less than 9 years quite "a geological shock of epic proportions."


Do you honestly believe the world will be below 80mbpd production in five years?

That'd certainly be proof of a peak. I don't think its very likely though.


I didn't say within the next 9 years, but in less than 9 years once we peak.

If peak comes in 2010 at 8%/year decline (which is the current trend) then in 2019 we will see 50% less production than today.

But to answer your question, no one knows.

My gut feeling? Yes, I don't think we will see an increase in oil production other than short blips.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Please Do Not Look at the Elephant

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Thu 26 Oct 2006, 01:16:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')r are we above nature and not subject to it's laws?


Man is the only species to have ever existed that is capable of destroying nature outright, but obviously, man would go extinct in the process.

Above nature? No. Not subject to its laws? Nature's laws are harsh and unforgiving to anything. But man is capable of manipulating nature and exploiting technicalities in its laws.

The greed of the few is more likely to cause the dieoff of the many than anything else. There are limits to what we can use, but we aren't using that efficiently given the drive for profit. There will be a point of no return, but I can't honestly say that we've passed that point yet.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests