by threadbear » Wed 25 Oct 2006, 02:36:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'Y')all might find this stuff a whole lot less confusing if you looked at it from the point of view of the US and China on the same team.
Do the Patriot Acts and the MCA look like the US is trying to be different than China, or does it look like the US is trying to become more like China? Hmmm???
Same team guys. Why are we not filling our SPR while China is filling theirs? We aren't competing, we're working in concert. Dollars outbound, resources inbound. We enforce subservience in the Mideast, the Chinese enforce subservience in Africa.
Whose feelings and interests have we stomped on more over the last six years, China, or Europe?
Try Russia and China on the same team. China needs to be assured of oil imports so will cozy up to Russia, not US. Read this article.
Emerging Russian Giant--Asia Times
"In recent years, major attention has been paid to the emergence of a Chinese economic colossus. What is generally missing in these discussions is the fact that China will not be able to emerge as a truly independent global power over the coming decade unless it is able to solve two strategic vulnerabilities - its growing dependence on energy imports for its economic growth and its inability to pose a credible nuclear deterrence to a US nuclear first strike.
Russia is the one remaining power which still has sufficient military deterrence potential in its strategic nuclear arsenal, and is expanding same, as well as abundant energy to make a credible counterweight to global US military and political primacy. A Eurasian combination of China and Russia and allied Eurasian states, essentially the states in and around the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), do present a potential counterweight to unilateral US dominance. An understanding of recent Russian developments in this light is essential to understand US foreign policy as well as global politics at present."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HJ25Ag01.html