Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

A Special Treat For My PO Homies

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:09:48

Ladies & Germs, I present to you the great Joe Bageant. Here's a blogger who speaks out for the little guy and gal. Check out his essays and you will learn much about how really America works.

Here's just one example of why I like Joe:

"One recent winter day, after the long dark commute back from the D.C. metro area, I stepped into my living room, where for a split-second I saw my daddy sitting on the couch by the flicker of the television eating ice cream straight from the carton, just like he did when I was a kid. Even a spilt second with an apparition is a long time, an eternity which defies our very notion of time. After the electric waves of shock quit going through my body, I sat down on the couch and reminded myself why I am a socialist: If I can do my bit, however small that may be, to prevent good men like my dad from working their guts out to line a lesser man's pocket, or restore dignity to labor in even the smallest way, then I will do it. And if I can use the only damned gift I ever had -- the one he never understood -- in testimony, then I will do that too."
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby gego » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:22:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', ' ')Here's a blogger who speaks out for the little guy and gal.


Seems that Stalin was for socialism also.

You forgot to mention that socialism, ownership and control of productive assets by the state, has failed everywhere it has been tried. Maybe this guy was indoctrinated in the government owned, government controlled school system in the USA where he formulated his "ideas".
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby AgentR » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:24:53

You've never truly felt the concept of lining someone elses pockets, until its the Governor's pockets that claim the right to lining.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:26:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', ' ')Here's a blogger who speaks out for the little guy and gal.


Seems that Stalin was for socialism also.

You forgot to mention that socialism, ownership and control of productive assets by the state, has failed everywhere it has been tried. Maybe this guy was indoctrinated in the government owned, government controlled school system in the USA where he formulated his "ideas".


Oh give it a rest with claptrap about state ownership. It's been done to death. Furthermore, it's a cheap strawman used to divert attention from the fact that the average Joe is getting screwed under the current system.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby holmes » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:29:41

The neo classical capitalist system is better than socialism/communism however it is a short term system built only for the time resources are plentiful. Ecological economics basically capitalism lite is a sustainable responsible system. However it will send shock waves through the bloats and the self laothing lazy commies. Not what they want. They want power. I want a system that considers power mad egoists a COST. I want all costs analysis. Your commie and current cappitalist systems dont even scratch the surface. Therefor null and void to me. Yawn. But cool. get the emotions in the equation. Nother issue I have. The economic system needs to have the emotions and politics and other forms of extraneous bullshit exterminated out of it.
Its alla bout costs. all costs. Im not seeing those calculations. Its always easier to go to shitstem instead of a system.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby gego » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:39:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', '
')
Oh give it a rest with claptrap about state ownership. It's been done to death. Furthermore, it's a cheap strawman used to divert attention from the fact that the average Joe is getting screwed under the current system.


We agree on one thing and that is the current system is a screw job. The current system is a combination of freedom (private ownership and control), fascism (private ownership with government control) and socialism (government ownership and control). Of the three only freedom does not involve government manipulation of the economy. It is this government manipulation that produces the screwing that we both find objectionable.

The difference between you and I is that you want to increase the government control and I want to eliminate it. Your solution will increase the screwing while mine will restore freedom, which in turn produces a normal distribution of wealth.

Socialism and fascism are slave systems and produce a skewed distribution of wealth with the masters having most of it and the masses living not so well.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:45:36

Spare me. You're both wrong.

The only truly sustainable economy is the gift-based tribal economy. Any other type of economy is a tool for control.

Unfortunately, our little monkey-brains can't reconcile a global village, and we're completely indoctrinated into economic dogma and social fragmentism, so we're hosed.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:58:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', '
')The difference between you and I is that you want to increase the government control and I want to eliminate it.



Wrong.

My point is that I agree with Joe about how honest people are being screwed over in our current system by the insatiably greedy. The latter run the show and have created the rules by which we all must lead our lives.

I'm not advocating any particular solution at this point. What I am doing is pointing out the need for the average person to wake the f**k up to what's happening to them. Big business is not your friend.

Let me give you just one example. I participate on a number of forums, and am absolutely appalled by the popular view that big business is never responsible for anything. I recently engaged in a debate on the obesity epidemic sweeping across America. I pointed out that the obesity epidemic started a few years after companies like MacDonalds appeared and that, therefore, MacDonald's should contribute to state health care costs. The response was "It's the fatties fault for eating that crap. Nobody is forcing them to." Well maybe no one is "forcing" them technically, but Americans are being carpet-bombed with advertising telling them to go have a Happy Meal.

If you don't believe that advertising works, you have to ask why companies like MacDonalds spend tens of millions on it every year.

We have a country which has been hijacked by big business. The only way to recover it is to first wake up like Joe tries to get us to do.

I don't know if any particular system is the solution.

It's more important for citizens to start proactively looking out for numero uno.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby gego » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 11:59:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', '
')
... Any other type of economy is a tool for control.


This may be true, but socialism and fascism are centrally controlled by an elite. Naturally they always fall prey to the temptation to take the greater share of the pie.

Free markets are not centrally controlled, but are controlled by the market participants thru the laws of supply and demand. All that needs be done is to have a system of laws that provides for redress against those who commit or attempt fraud (including colluding to rig markets).

What destroyed the US was government entry into the market place in an active controlling roll as socialist or fascist. Instead of preventing the rigging of markets the government rigged them, much to the detriment of the general population.

Of course these systems of government control appeal to those who feel left behind and abused by the system. Government promises to take from the rich and give to the poor in order to stay in power.. They forget to tell you that they created the poor in the first place, so on and on the merry-go-round continues.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby JustinFrankl » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 14:20:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'I')t's more important for citizens to start proactively looking out for numero uno.

When they start looking out for numero uno, and stop paying attention to those who would seek to control them with laws and regulations, they are no longer "citizens". I believe the current popular phrase would be "enemy combatants".
"We have seen the enemy, and he is us." -- Walt Kelly
JustinFrankl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby gego » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 15:02:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JustinFrankl', '
')When they start looking out for numero uno, and stop paying attention to those who would seek to control them with laws and regulations, they are no longer "citizens". I believe the current popular phrase would be "enemy combatants".


Can't we be citizens and enemy combatants? Once this gets out of hand I don't think they will bother with hair splitting; just get in the cattle car and enjoy the free train ride.

(Interesting statement by Walt Kelly by the way since it contains two grammatical errors. Enemy is one of those words that can be singular or plural. If he intended it to be singular, then he should have said "he is I". If he meant it as plural, then it would be "they are we". He never should use "me" or "us" with "is" or "are" because these are forms of the passive verb "to be". But then for a cartoonist, who cares!)
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 15:28:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JustinFrankl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'I')t's more important for citizens to start proactively looking out for numero uno.

When they start looking out for numero uno, and stop paying attention to those who would seek to control them with laws and regulations, they are no longer "citizens". I believe the current popular phrase would be "enemy combatants".


You know why I secretly hope for a Peak Oil collapse? Because it would bring about the collapse of big gubmint. Combine a big remot gubmint controlled by big business and the result is the screwing of 99% of humanity.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby smiley » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 16:04:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')ree markets are not centrally controlled, but are controlled by the market participants thru the laws of supply and demand. All that needs be done is to have a system of laws that provides for redress against those who commit or attempt fraud (including colluding to rig markets).


Free markets lead to disequilibrium, not equilibrium. That mechanism been proven time after time.

To maintain a healthy situation the goverment has to tax and redistribute money as well as implement measures to prevent the accumulation of money.

A good government should therefore incorporate both capitalist as socialist elements.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')eems that Stalin was for socialism also.


Yeah and so was Plato.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby gego » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 16:29:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')ree markets are not centrally controlled, but are controlled by the market participants thru the laws of supply and demand. All that needs be done is to have a system of laws that provides for redress against those who commit or attempt fraud (including colluding to rig markets).


Free markets lead to disequilibrium, not equilibrium. That mechanism been proven time after time.

To maintain a healthy situation the goverment has to tax and redistribute money as well as implement measures to prevent the accumulation of money.

A good government should therefore incorporate both capitalist as socialist elements.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')eems that Stalin was for socialism also.


Yeah and so was Plato.


I didn't know that Plato suffered from low morals also. You just never know, do you!

Woof! Woof!
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby gego » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 16:37:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', '
')
You know why I secretly hope for a Peak Oil collapse? Because it would bring about the collapse of big gubmint..


That thought has also crossed my mind.

It is true that periods of freedom have arisen out of the collapse of the power structure in the past, so there is something hopeful to consider. You can be sure, though, that even if we escape government imposed slavery temporarily, this natural inclination for the few to plunder the many will raise its ugly head again. History has shown that all periods of freedom eventually give way to much longer periods of slavery and the related stagnation and human suffering. Freedom is more the anomaly.

It is also possible that the collapse of the power structure post peak will give rise to even greater tyrany. I hope I can live long enough to see what develops.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby ipWinston » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 17:11:22

why do people always look towards broken theories of the past to deal with events in the future? the past must be used as a stepping stone for thought.

democracy eventually collapses...and what springs from this collapse?
usually a form of the same system in place before the revolution-this example is facism, distorted communism, or some sort of authoritarian regieme

we need to work towards a sustainable post-democratic system of government and economics.

lets try something that hasnt been tried (and failed) before, kay?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociocracy

definatly the groundwork for a plan that can be expanded upon

...ok back to your business with
pinko commies and facist pigs...
User avatar
ipWinston
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue 06 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby holmes » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 17:22:43

Im with ya winston. economic growth brings death. Need for a steady state ecological paradigm economics. I know the whole old shitstems are a yawner. But hey its easier to just burn to a fucking cinder.
Economic growth truly weakens moral resolve and erodes national definition and pride.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby smiley » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 18:05:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'w')hy do people always look towards broken theories of the past to deal with events in the future? the past must be used as a stepping stone for thought


There is a difference between a theory and the implementation of a theory. The fact that a theory has been implemented wrongly in the past does not mean that the theory itself is wrong.

The idea of a socialist Utopian state (which by the way long predates Marx/Engels) should IMO not be discarded just because communism has not shown to best method to reach that state.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby oowolf » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 18:38:10

User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: A Special Treat For My PO Homies

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 17 Oct 2006, 18:53:00

Once again, I have doubts about the sources of info and go looking for non hyperbolic accounts of events or situations. The law is pretty grave and sweeping. from wikipedia:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')n “unlawful enemy combatant” can be any person – not excluding American citizens - determined to be one by a “competent tribunal” established by the President or the Secretary of Defense [Sec.948a(1)(ii)]. What comprises a competent tribunal – or by what criteria they would make such a determination - is not defined.

The Act changes pre-existing law to explicitly suspend the writ of habeas corpus for detainees even if they are U.S. citizens [Section 7(a)]. This provision applies to all cases pending at the time the Act is enacted, as well as to all such future cases.

If the government chooses to bring a prosecution against the detainee, a military commission is convened for this purpose. The following rules are some of those established for trying unlawful enemy combatants who are not citizens of the United States. [Sec.948b (a)] The Act does not exclude these rules from being applied when trying unlawful enemy combatants who are American citizens.

* Certain sections of the Uniform Code of Military Justice are deemed inapplicable - including some relating to a speedy trial [Sec.948b (d)(1)(A)], compulsory self-incrimination [Sec.948b (d)(1)(B)], and pre-trial investigation [Sec.948b (d)(1)(C)].

* A civilian defense attorney may not be used unless they have clearance to view materials classified Secret. [Sec.949c(b)(3)(D)]

* Based on his findings, the judge may introduce hearsay evidence [Sec.949a(b)(2)(E)(i)], evidence obtained without a search warrant [Sec.949a(b)(2)(B)], evidence obtained when the degree of coercion is disputed [Sec.948r (d)], or classified evidence not made available to the defense [Sec.949d(f)(2)(B)].

* A finding of Guilty requires only a 2/3 majority [Sec.949m(a)]

* No defendant may invoke the Geneva Conventions in legal proceedings on their behalf. [Section 5(a)]

* The President determines “the meaning and application” of the Geneva Conventions banning the torture of prisoners. [Sec.6 (a)(3)(A)]

* The accused may be tried for the same offense a second time “with his consent” [Sec.949h(a)].

* If the military commission returns a finding of Not Guilty, its convening authority is not required to take action on the findings. [Sec.950b(c)(3)]


Congress has given the Administration all the legal clearance it needs. The one that puzzles me the most is the "The accused may be tried for the same offense a second time “with his consent” provision. What the hell is this? Who would consent to a second trial if found innocent? If found guilty, why would the government want to try them again? This makes no sense. I do have doubts that this is meant to squelch free-speech or criminalize anyone who publically expresses doubt about official accounts of 911. That seems like paranoid hyperbole. This is basically a "we are not fooling around with terrorists, folks, so tell the ACLU to bug out" bill it seems to me. I am well aware that some of you don't agree.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron