by gego » Wed 11 Oct 2006, 16:30:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('holmes', '
')
Your absolutely right, gego. I hang my head in sadness and shame. The human condition(abomination?) ruined anything potential good this beast had. Really no chance. And Bush is a traitor. However the democrats are even worse! Bush is the biggest Liberal ever to grace the orifice office. and I despise using thse orwellian double speak words like "liberal" or "conservative". Im just free man wanting to live a simple power down life. and thats it. Never taking more than I need and so on. Its grotesque.
I have trouble thinking of either the left or the right as being worse. Is lung cancer or bone cancer worse.
Here is an interestint except from a "right to keep and bear arms" essay:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/hornberger/hornberger11.html$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacob Hornberger', '
')Our ancestors were right – the federal government, by its very nature, attracts people who have absolutely no respect for such rights or the principles that underlie them. How do we know this? One good way is by examining how these people behave in the absence of constitutional restraints. A good model for such an experiment exists in Iraq, a country that federal officials have run for more than a year.
“But the Constitution doesn’t apply to how the federal government runs Iraq,” someone might argue. He would be missing my point. The point is whether federal officials honor the rights in the Constitution because they have to or because they believe in those principles.
How have federal officials, including the military, conducted themselves as rulers in Iraq, with no pesky federal judges, legislature, criminal-defense lawyers, or constitutional “technicalities” to get in their way?
They’ve shot demonstrators; closed down newspapers critical of the military; searched people’s homes and businesses without warrants; killed suspected criminals as well as innocent bystanders; arrested people without warrants; detained criminal suspects indefinitely; denied detainees due process of law, the right to counsel, the right to bail, the right to jury trials, and the right to habeas corpus; imposed cruel and unusual punishments on people consisting of torture, rape, sex abuse, and murder by beatings; appointed unelected “interim” sub-rulers with dictatorial powers to carry out their directives; and ensured that an elected legislature would not be part of the “interim” regime.
And, of course, they have imposed gun control and gun confiscation and enforced their measures with deadly force.
In other words, they’ve done in Iraq all the things for which Americans rebelled against King George III – and more.
“But that doesn’t mean that they would do all this to Americans.” Of course it does, especially if they believe it would be necessary for “national security,” which they inevitably would. After all, don’t forget that they arrested an American, Jose Padilla, on American soil; charged him with conspiracy to commit terrorism; turned him over to the Pentagon; and denied him habeas corpus, due process, right to counsel, a jury trial, and all the other rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, including even freedom of speech.
...But that’s just one person,” one might say. But one person leads to another person who leads to another person, as the people of Chile and Argentina discovered when the military regimes in those countries were “disappearing” an ever-growing number of people during their “wars on terrorism.” As people who have lost their liberties at the hands of their own government throughout history have discovered, once the sacrifice and surrender of rights has begun, the march toward tyranny becomes inexorable.
Looks to me like we are taking the path of Germany under Hitler.