Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE US Housing Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby TorrKing » Mon 25 Sep 2006, 10:31:53

Existing-home prices fall for 1st time in 11 years

Maybe the market is past the tipping point now. Collapse is probably next. Just ignore all of the soft landing baloney in this article. The message is in the headline itself.

Torjus Gaaren
User avatar
TorrKing
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu 24 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: The ever shrinking wilds of Norway

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby TreebeardsUncle » Mon 25 Sep 2006, 15:01:11

That graph (http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/200 ... .large.gif in http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/9/22/75144/3774) indicating that a house worth $100,000 adjusted for inflation would have been $66,000 in 1920 and $199,000 in 2006 is interesting. Before 1997 the value varied by 100,000 - 34,000 up to 100,000 + 23,000, but in the last 10 years it has come up 99,000, which is 3 to 4 times as much variation seen in the previous 107 years. Along these lines I read, perhaps in this forum, that a Dutch economist stated that the runup in housing prices seen in the states over the last several years was a statistical aberation likely to be seen only once in 500 years or so. Also, note that in time series one is likely to see values more than 2 standard deviations above the mean only 2.5 % of the time. We are clearly well above that, perhaps 3 or even 4 standard deviations above the mean housing values. (Would appreciate someone with greater statistical knowledge of housing prices in particular weighing in here.) At any rate this mortgage lender's market is due for a big reduction as up until 1997 that originally 100,000 house was never worth more than 123,000.

I also read an article in the Sacramento Bee or SF Chronicle business section yesterday that noted that real estate agents etc were the ones claiming there would be a soft landing and who are also now proposing a wild card market as an alternative. More likely we will see a hard crash of a 20% or more in depriation followed by a stagnant market as the hard landing and lost decade scenarios were those favored by those in the know who weren't so financially dependent on continued speculative appreciation.
TreebeardsUncle
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu 15 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby Tapas » Tue 26 Sep 2006, 00:32:08

Study this bearish forecast by Dr. David Lereah, Chief Economist for the National Association of Realtors:


Real Estate Reality Check


Notice, how he reveals the true state of affairs through these 60 slides while speaking amongst his peers at the NAR Leadership Summit held last August. Quite a departure from the cheerleading role he plays on TV, won't you say?

Tapas
User avatar
Tapas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby Tapas » Tue 26 Sep 2006, 01:13:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nazman', '
')I agree, The Housing Collapse, Second Great Depression, Falling off Olduvai's Cliff and Decent of Hubbert's Curve you've mentioned are bad enough. But that's too optimistic in my view.

But think about it along side the immenient Crash in the U.S Dollar, Martial Law in America, Declining EROEI for all Energy, the Clash of Civilisations, the Tradegy of the Commons, Jevon's Paradox, the Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns, The Coming Peak Oil Grand Depression, the Euro vs the Petro Dollar, Bird Flu, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, Liebig's Law & Overshoot, Diebold Black Box Voting and the 2000 and 2004 Stolen Elections, Let It Happen On Purpose Complicity on 9/11, Global Warming, The Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Inevitability of A Globo-Thermal Nuclear War for Resources point to only one thing. The Shit Hits The Fan. Every Word Deserves To be Capitalised.


Nazman, I salute you!

You deserve the grand prize for painting the big picture with the fewest number of words. A curious reader can easily spend a year or two Googling each phrase in that paragraph and researching each topic.

I think you have covered it all. Perhaps Aaron Dunlap could nominate that paragraph as gauging Peak Oil in a nutshell :-)

For some of us who took the "Red Pill", it took several years to figure it out. You presented it in less than 150 words.

Very well put, and I agree with you 100% that these are the real issues that should be discussed 24/7 on the main stream media to educated and enlighten the masses. The consequences of ignoring the truth can be deadly. We are only a small group on the Internet willing to discuss these issues. I hope we could spread the awareness before it is all a lost cause.

Thanks to Aaron for hosting this Forum and thanks to posters like you and many others from whom I continue to learn.

We are entering uncharted territory. The years ahead would be very difficult. I would hope the surviving population would be able to distill valuable knowledge and wisdom to usher in a new way of life, correcting all the shortcomings of our generation.

Viewed under a geologic scale, human civilization is going through birthing pains. We have a lot to learn and a long way to go.


Tapas
User avatar
Tapas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby Doly » Tue 26 Sep 2006, 08:29:06

It's bad, but isn't as bad as it looks in that post. We only have to deal with three interrelated issues.

1. Depletion of Fossil Fuels

The first critical point we'll reach in this category is Peak Oil AKA Descent of Hubbert's Curve, Falling off Olduvai's Cliff (in somebody's rather extreme and quite nutty version of the consequences). A consequence of this is Declining EROEI for all Fossil Fuel Energy. This is a specific instance of the Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns, but by no means diminishing returns are anything new. The Second Law of Thermodynamics very definitely does NOT have to do with this.

The reason we'll reach this critical point instead of preparing for it in time is the Tradegy of the Commons. Jevon's Paradox, in spite of all the claims that it's relevant, in fact, isn't, because when total production declines, there's no possibility of somebody else taking what you conserve.

An almost inevitable consequence of this is Resource Wars AKA Clash of Civilizations in the doublespeak of the West, with the possibility of leading to Martial Law in America (though not very likely, in my opinion). The Inevitability of A Global-Thermal Nuclear War for Resources remains to be seen, and in my opinion both a global war (as opposed to fighting where the resources are) and a nuclear war are unlikely.

2. Global Warming.

Tied to the above, because we wouldn't have global warming if we hadn't been burning fossil fuels in the first place.

3. Economic crash.

AKA Second Great Depression, Crash in the U.S Dollar, The Coming Peak Oil Grand Depression. The Housing Collapse is only an aspect of it. The issue of the Euro vs the Petro Dollar is only a small part of it, and it remains to be seen if it's even particularly important.

The real background reason for this is the fact that our economy intrinsically assumes there will be always more available energy, so productivity can always be increased by throwing more energy into the process of manufacturing.

The fact that oil needs to be imported in huge quantities doesn't help to square the books, either.

The fact that the current American government is suspect (Diebold Black Box Voting and the 2000 and 2004 Stolen Elections) doesn't help either, but perhaps it's logical to expect that only vultures have an interest in a dying country. I regard Let It Happen On Purpose Complicity on 9/11 as a conspiracy theory, though.


Because the three issues are interrelated, you could see it all as only one big problem, as opposed to several problems happening at once. I would call this overall problem Reaching the Limits to Growth.

Pandemics, like Bird Flu and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, are unlikely to be a major issue, unless living standards drop catastrophically. After all, we've dealt OK with AIDS and the vaccine for bird flu is almost ready.

Even though Liebig's Law & Overshoot is a favourite of Monte, it remains to be proven that we're in overshoot.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby emailking » Tue 26 Sep 2006, 15:56:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', 'I') regard Let It Happen On Purpose Complicity on 9/11 as a conspiracy theory, though.


That it would be by the definition of conspiracy theory.
User avatar
emailking
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby Zardoz » Wed 27 Sep 2006, 02:14:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '.')..it remains to be proven that we're in overshoot.

The fact that 850 million people are malnourished right now is proof enough.

Come on, that's almost three Americas.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Fri 29 Sep 2006, 16:57:10

http://www.wtop.com/?nid=111&sid=918889
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ASHINGTON (AP) - Federal regulators directed banks on Friday to properly explain the risks posed to borrowers from interest-only and other nontraditional mortgages.
The regulators said that banks needed to make sure that the loans they made were "consistent with prudent lending practices, including consideration of a borrower's repayment capacity."

Whew! Good thing they issued this warning before anybody got hurt.
I feel much better knowing our federal regulators are on the ball, making sure there won't be a bunch of bad loans taxpayers could wind up covering.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby Denny » Fri 29 Sep 2006, 17:30:15

They locked the gate after the cattle escaped. Again.
User avatar
Denny
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby EnergyHog » Fri 29 Sep 2006, 18:16:03

Oh that is rich. I suppose this is so that they can say that they did their duty by warning people. What a joke.
User avatar
EnergyHog
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Mon 27 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby RonMN » Fri 29 Sep 2006, 19:34:58

They "JUST" figured this out?

It's no wonder they can't understand the economic ramifications of peak oil production!

I'm heading back to the "preparing for the future" forumn :(
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby Daculling » Fri 29 Sep 2006, 19:55:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyHog', 'O')h that is rich. I suppose this is so that they can say that they did their duty by warning people. What a joke.


Yep, bust out the KY. If you have none it's gonna hurt.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby rwwff » Fri 29 Sep 2006, 20:35:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyHog', 'O')h that is rich. I suppose this is so that they can say that they did their duty by warning people. What a joke.

A year ago, if you'd of gone to a regulator/accountant guy and said,
A: "you know all these ARM's you're seeing?"
B: "Yeah, seems normal enough, just investors gaming the interest rates, looking for the bottom."

A: "Investors?"
B: "Yeah, we know they're playing a bit fast and loose with the rules, but they're all big boys, they know what their risks are."

A: "Have you looked into a sampling of these guys to see what their total portfolios and underlying networth is?"
B: "Well no. But who else would be out there buying lots of houses and hooking them to ARMs?"

A: "Ummm.. Joe Schmoe that works at the factory drawing a 2xMedian salary with no bonuses.
B: "Huh? Wha? Nawwwww. Bad joke, you can leave now."

A: "Ok, ok. But think about it ok?"
B: "Leave please."
[exit, stage left, door closing softly sound]
B - sips coffee, looks at pile of folders...
B - nervousness... scoffs quietly.
B - opens folder.
B - faints
- dim lights on cue
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby Tapas » Fri 29 Sep 2006, 21:10:39

Guys!


On a lighter note....how about some humor to kick off the weekend?



Mr. and Mrs. Too Much Home Buyer



Mrs. Addicted to Big Sales Shopper



Mr. Impulse Buyer Guy



Tapas :-D
User avatar
Tapas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby coyote » Fri 29 Sep 2006, 21:42:46

I've actually heard a couple of advertisments on the radio lately, banks offering consolidation on ARM loans. This is in the San Diego area, with one of the biggest runups of real estate values in the nation. I'm thinking that's going to be big business over the next couple of years.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby rwwff » Sat 30 Sep 2006, 13:27:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gideon', 'I')t's all very sad.
Most people in the US have no guidance and no direction.
It worked out great for the banks
....
Man, you have gotta respect the banks for their clever evilness.
I despise bankers.

Why is it the bankers' responsibility to educate everyone, on every conceivable financial tool out there?

If there are greedy middle class consumers out there looking for free money, it only stands to reason that there would be greedy upper class lenders willing to give them $1 today in order to take $2 from them tomorrow. I don't see how one is more evil than the other.

Bankers offer products, to me, just like to everyone else; those people that can say, "thanks for the offer, but no." to 99% of the offers earn respect; those that say "yes sir ree!" to every scam that rolls down the street don't.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby mmasters » Sat 30 Sep 2006, 18:41:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gideon', 'I')t's all very sad.
Most people in the US have no guidance and no direction.
It worked out great for the banks
....
Man, you have gotta respect the banks for their clever evilness.
I despise bankers.

Why is it the bankers' responsibility to educate everyone, on every conceivable financial tool out there?

If there are greedy middle class consumers out there looking for free money, it only stands to reason that there would be greedy upper class lenders willing to give them $1 today in order to take $2 from them tomorrow. I don't see how one is more evil than the other.

Bankers offer products, to me, just like to everyone else; those people that can say, "thanks for the offer, but no." to 99% of the offers earn respect; those that say "yes sir ree!" to every scam that rolls down the street don't.
\

Ultimately it should be individual responsibility but on a large scale as this it goes beyond that. Whoever changed the underwriting laws to allow this behavior is IMO bears some real responsibility. But you can't exactly defend the banks, bank problems on this scale become everyone's problem. At the root of it all though I blame the fed. The fed has ruined this country and will continue to do so.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Top

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby Tapas » Sat 30 Sep 2006, 21:47:55

Some posters can be pretty creative! Here is a funny one by Jannifl on the Housing Bubble Blog

A Grim Fairy Tale:

One day little piggy decided that he wanted a new car so he went to the wolf and said, "Wolfy, I want a brand new car, but I don't have the money to pay for it." The wolf said, "Little pig, you deserve a new car because you are a smart pig and luckily the straw house you built can now exactly pay for that car with its equity. I can refinance your loan with a lower interest rate and your house payments will be even lower, its like getting a free car of your choice."

Little piggy was very happy and went out and picked out a car he would never have been able to pay for otherwise. He was only mildly disturbed by the fact that when he pulled up to the stop lights all the other little piggy's had new cars also. This worked so well that little piggy bought a lot of other things as well.

Little piggy was very pleased with his new found success and all the things he had acquired and he decided that a bigger straw house that befits a pig of his stature was in order. So he went back to the wolf and said, "Wolf, all the other little pigs I know have new straw houses and I want one too. Wolf said, "My you are a smart little pig, because sight unseen I have figured your straw house is worth enough to give you the financial standing to buy the new house you want."

Little piggy was very happy and went out and put a contract on a home he would never have been able to buy otherwise. He was only mildly disturbed by the fact that all the other little pigs were doing the same thing and he was outbid on the house he really wanted. So he put his old house up for sale, and it did not sell. He was not just a little mildly disturbed that all the other pigs were doing the same thing, in fact he was outraged.

Finally along comes chicken little, at last a real potential buyer. Chicken little said she liked piggy's house, but that at his price there was no way she could afford piggy's house and a car to drive.

Piggy was exasperated that chicken little could be so stupid about financial matters, so he took the time to explain to her that if she just bought a house she could be successful like him and get a lot of free stuff. Chicken little was skeptical, because she had been hit in the head once before by someone else's nut and knocked unconscious.

So she said, "No deal piggy". Piggy waited and waited and got more and more frantic. The wolf had called and was huffing and puffing about how time was running out and he needed to sell his little straw house soon. So he called chicken little on the phone and said, "O.K. chicken little, I will give you my new car if you buy the house".

Chicken little thought about it and decided that did not like the kind of car that piggy and all the other pigs were driving, and if she was going to pay all that money she wanted to pick out her own car. So she told piggy that she wanted him to lower the price on his house. Piggy did not want to do this, because then he would have to pay for his car with his income and he could not afford to do that.

The wolf called and said he would huff and puff and blow down both of his straw houses down he did not find a buyer soon. Piggy is now worried that now he may end up without a house at all. He is also trying to figure out how he will be able to make the payments on his car and afford rent also.

Meanwhile chicken little has been hanging out in the chicken coop co-op, the wolf has been knocking, but no one is answering the door.

The end :-D
---------------------------------------------

And now from A Grim Fairy Tale to the Grim Reality:


LA Times: Housing Party Collapses


Tapas
User avatar
Tapas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat 05 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Analyzing the Housing Bubble

Unread postby rwwff » Sat 30 Sep 2006, 21:57:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('article', 'T')he house, the broker explained to me and my partner in voyeurism (we'd spent the afternoon visiting open houses, but it was chiefly to scrutinize people's bookshelves), was weeks away from being auctioned off by the bank. This was our chance, she implied, to get a great deal by taking advantage of someone else's royal screw-up (call it a schadenfreude sale!).


More proof for yall. The Banks want nothing to do with these houses, nor their insurance payments, nor their tax bills. They foreclose and go to auction as quickly as absolutely possible. The note holder gets stuck with the remaining debt, and the bank will do its best to collect the difference.

But they will not be keeping the house.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Regulators Warn Bankers About Risky Home Loans

Unread postby rwwff » Sat 30 Sep 2006, 22:37:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gideon', 'C')ome on rrwwpo, MFP, you can do much better than that, can't you? That was your weakest post yet, and, frankly, a few more like that and you'll lose your MFP status.

Sorry, but planting broccoli seedlings, showing my daughter how to not kill the small, three week old daikons with the watering can, and tending to my nectarines needed the time, more than I needed to be a MFP:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1'). How sad that people have no guidance.
2. Bankers made out great.
and
3. I despise bankers.
Why include a quote of my words when you don't respond to the quoted words with a counter?

Because I think the bankers deserved to make out great; though it remains to be seen if they've succeeded. If profits remain high through and after the RE crash and eventual stabilization or inflation, then we'll know the banks did great.
If banks start going belly-up in a couple years, we'll know that perhaps they weren't as smart as they appeared at first blush.
On the other hand, both of these parties participated in something that, for at least a while, put a normal sized house out of sane reach of a normal middle class family. They are both vile. And no, I didn't get hurt, nor did I take advantage of this party; but I know people that did, and they are now staring down the barrel of a 12 guage named greed, and they deserve the results.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o yours, which appears to be, "people have free will and should be allowed to execute it, even to their own detriment" leads to hypotheticals where manifestly unfair practices are used to financially rape downtrodden people.

Any middle class person that was owning two houses knew better. They were raping their neighbor to pay for unearned vacations and snazzy cars. They knew it, and they deserve to pay for it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y your unlined principle, that is OK. The way I tried to live, that's evil and abusive and wrong, and we, the intelligentsia, have an obligation to protect her from our fellows who are not as moral as us.

Different group of people. I do have a lot of sympathy for these guys, but I'm not sure how to really fix the problem. On the one hand, "lease to own" is about the only way these folks can purchase relatively new furniture; but my question is, other than the TV, why do they want to purchase new furniture? I never have.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') can't live like that. I realize that there are many out there who are not - and cannot be - sophisticated enough to understand how to balance a checkbook, let alone read and understand a 30 page mortgage document.
So should banks be prohibited from offering anything other than 30yr fixed rate notes to people who can't pass some sort of financial competency exam? NAACP would go ballistic. Urban League would have your head on a pike for even suggesting such a thing. Lawsuits would be everywhere.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') feel a very strong obligation to defend the weak. While I consider myself a rabid individualist, I don't think that means that the weak get thrown to the wolves.
Whose the wolf and whose the lamb in this situation I do not think is clear yet. A wolf hunts and kills for short term sustenance and pleasure. The middle class flipper hunted houses to take notes to get free cars for short term sustenance and pleasure.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd finally, I note that there is a difference between the two professionals biting off more than they can chew - I have little sympathy for them, and the 25 year olds buying their first house, making 40 grand a year from two job, who don't understand the basic mechanisms of how a loan works.
Seem impossible?
I understand the desire to make the distinction. But the banks have largely been prohibited by various anti-discrimination and urban development deals to take that sort of thing into consideration. The law pretty much says, if they can make the payment by hook or by crook, they get the loan.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you think that the average product of the Holocaust of the American Education system understands basic loan terminology and workings, then, my dear friend, you are asleep at the wheel.
I don't disagree with you there. Having seen what manages to get a high school diploma these days.
I'm not sure how you can do anything with the law to help though. The law forces the banks to assume that anyone walking in their door has the same level of competence. As long as they can produce the documents to support the income and networth declerations, they've got to issue the loan.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest