Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Zen And The Art Of Debate

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 13:25:53

One should not be too identified with one's thinking. Thoughts shift, and most of them come from outside, anyway. A detachtment from one's thoughts allows a more critical assessment of them. There is an element of paradox in this: can we think about thinking, can we think at all without being in our thoughts? But how else can we rise above our limited thought repertoire? So on to the debate part of this, and yes, it is our gold medal debater miki that prompted this: one of my favorite posters is threadbear. She has a thought stream which I find deplorable in it's political side as she does mine, but she's still fine in my book. We both know that ideas are not more important than people, that the opposite is in fact the truth. Miki shows signs of this too, but I feel they are faint signs. Partisan identification is a dangerous thing, one can lose one's way going too far down that road. It comes from being too identified with thinking. Back up, I would say, step outside of the usual thought streams and believe nothing for a while. It can't hurt.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby greenworm » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:00:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')houghts shift, and most of them come from outside, anyway.


Phenomenologists would disagree, they would consider it an interaction of the two.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:03:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')houghts shift, and most of them come from outside, anyway.


Phenomenologists would disagree, but nice try.
Speaking of nice tries, how about if you give it a little more effort? Detachtment from ideas seems to make them more interesting. Tell us about this phenomenologist argument. I'd like to hear it.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby Pops » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:12:39

Don’t know notin about thought streams, motorcycle maintenance and whatall but playing Debate Devil to one's own thoughts and beliefs is a sure way to realize how fragile their underpinnings.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby greenworm » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:13:19

There is a world wide web, look it up yourself if you are inquisitive.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:18:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', 'T')here is a world wide web, look it up yourself if you are inquisitive.
If I look up phenomenology (and I did once so I know) I'll get a vast response that doesn't answer the question I gave you. You seem to know about it, so why not say something of your knowledge? And Pops, agreed.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby Miki » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:33:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')houghts shift, and most of them come from outside, anyway.


Phenomenologists would disagree, but nice try.
Speaking of nice tries, how about if you give it a little more effort? Detachtment from ideas seems to make them more interesting. Tell us about this phenomenologist argument. I'd like to hear it.


Here is my take on this. I can think of two ways to address your question: one is philosophical and the other is psychological (in terms of human cognition).

Here's a rough draft of what a philosophical look at this would involve. As far as I remember (I took my last course in General Philosophy 10 years ago): Back in the XVIIIth century, Western civilization favored Rationalism, the idea that everything can be understood through reason. By the XIXth century, rationalism had shifted into Empircism, the idea that everything can be studied objectively through scientific knowledge. This of course implied that nature was governed by certain universal laws; otherwise, how could one conduct such a systematic study of it?

In the XXth/XXIst centuries human beings have become much more humble. We've realized that nature is not ordered and that some natural phenomena are completely random (eg, at the sub-atomic level). We also realized that we are a minuscle point in the universe, and that what we don't know outweighs what we know by far. As a result, new philosophical worldviews emerged, such as existentialism and phenomenology.

Phenomenology basically says that you can't detach yourself from the object you're studying, because yur perceptionand experience of that object is heavily influenced by who you are, previous experiences, etc. This was a great depart from the Western worldview of the last few centuries. And it has had a great effect on scientific thinking. Once we realized that complete objectivity is almost impossible, our ways of discovering/studying the world start changing. This explains why there's been a shift from quantitative/numerical methods to qualtative methods of study.

So back to your question, in complex social issues like the ones we're discussing, phenomenology would argue that one *can't* study these realities in a completely detached objective matter. Your values/past experience/background would always get in the way.

You might argue that one can assess the objective facts available, and phenomenology would tell you that your assessment of those facts would be coloured by your own biases. Mind you though, that phenomenologists do not consider this a bad thing. On the contrary, it is argued that the best way to study a complex phenomenon is to inmerse yourself in it and experience it.

So perhaps you should travel to Israel and check for yourself what's going on? Or ask an American that has been there? :)
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby greenworm » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:39:45

there you go



I'd go with Husserl's definition as taken from his book "ideas". Heidegger is more of an existentialist who is using phenomenological thought as a starting point, the two schools of thought actually work nicely together so it does seem like a natural progression. Basically, you observe (interact as well) the surrounding phenomena and from this interaction of the two comes subjective thoughts, understandings, reality for lack of better descriptors. All in all, this is mental masterbation, a minor in philosophy has led me to this conclusion. Zen is right up there as the silliest philosophies I have ever encountered, to me it is attempting to delve into reality intensely in an attempt to figure out the moment. Waste of time imho.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby greenworm » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:46:19

Double post, I suck. :(

Miki actually explained it very well, kudos.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:47:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')You might argue that one can assess the objective facts available, and phenomenology would tell you that your assessment of those facts would be coloured by your own biases. Mind you though, that phenomenologists do not consider this a bad thing. On the contrary, it is argued that the best way to study a complex phenomenon is to inmerse yourself in it and experience it.

So perhaps you should travel to Israel and check for yourself what's going on? Or ask an American that has been there? :)
I would love to go to Israel. I have a daughter who has seen much of Europe, and I've never been there. All I've ever seen is the American southwest: California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas. Once I went to Louisiana and rode a helicopter down the Mississippi river to an oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico. And I've been down Mexico way, but that's it. The old Cliff Dwellings of the Anasazi Indians are beautiful and haunting. They teach us to not be too caught up in current events.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:53:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', ' ')All in all, this is mental masterbation, a minor in philosophy has led me to this conclusion. Zen is right up there as the silliest philosophies I have ever encountered, to me it is attempting to delve into reality intensely in an attempt to figure out the moment. Waste of time imho.
Does mental masturbation give mental orgasms? Sex is in the brain, they say. I'm no expert on Zen, but I like the idea of koans and the inscrutability of life. As miki pointed out, Western thought has moved into empirical realms. That's where it all started, figuring out how to craft obsidian spear points to bring down Mammoths and prey.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby Miki » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 15:01:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'S')o perhaps you should travel to Israel and check for yourself what's going on? Or ask an American that has been there? :)
I would love to go to Israel. I have a daughter who has seen much of Europe, and I've never been there. All I've ever seen is the American southwest: California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas. Once I went to Louisiana and rode a helicopter down the Mississippi river to an oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico. And I've been down Mexico way, but that's it. The old Cliff Dwellings of the Anasazi Indians are beautiful and haunting. They teach us to not be too caught up in current events.[/quote]

I've always wondered why Americans don't travel abroad more often. You guys make more money than Lebanese, yet you travel less! I remember when I was in the States and I'd mention that I was Lebanese but grew up in Peru. People would tell me how lucky I was to have been to so many places, as if they felt they'd never get a chance to do that...

Can anyone explain to me why you guys don't travel given that most of you manifest a desire of doing so?
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby greenworm » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 15:06:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat's where it all started, figuring out how to craft obsidian spear points to bring down Mammoths and prey.


Ironic, that may be where it all ends if you believe in the zombie hordes theory.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m no expert on Zen, but I like the idea of koans and the inscrutability of life.


Unfortunately, that is all it is, an idea. Aw, Husserl would be proud of me if he were alive today. :lol:
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 15:15:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')Can anyone explain to me why you guys don't travel given that most of you manifest a desire of doing so?
In my case, there is a twofold explanation. For one, I earn considerably less money than the average American and I can't afford it. And two, if you travel you just get exposed to foreign germs. My immune system is adapted to living here, that's good enough for me. I'm kidding of course, but most travel involves staying in pre-packaged tourist locales. Who needs that? My travels are in the mind, through reading. And interacting with interesting people like you over the internet.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 15:20:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat's where it all started, figuring out how to craft obsidian spear points to bring down Mammoths and prey.


Ironic, that may be where it all ends if you believe in the zombie hordes theory.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m no expert on Zen, but I like the idea of koans and the inscrutability of life.


Unfortunately, that is all it is, an idea. Aw, Husserl would be proud of me if he were alive today. :lol:
Unfortunately, the Mammoths are all gone and so are most of the prey. If the Zen emphasis was on absurdity, I'm with them. Human history seems to be headed to complete absurdity.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby NEOPO » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 15:47:39

uhm what?

So yer saying that we are unable to objectively discuss peak oil etc etc because we are unable to take our own private positions and previous life experiences out of the equation?

I do not know if this exactly applies yet I find that most people are unable to overcome their own deficiencies long enough to believe that someone else has indeed overcome them and is therefore thinking on a higher level.

For instance - altruism - most believe it is impossible to reach such a state of mind yet it appears that that is exactly why most can never believe nor ever attain this level of thought.
They believe it is impossible and thus for them at least.... it is.
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby smiley » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 15:55:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n my case, there is a twofold explanation. For one, I earn considerably less money than the average American and I can't afford it.


Those are your reasons. But I think what Miki is wondering about (and I am too) is why the average American doesn't travel.

Is it because they don't want to, because they don't speak any languages or because they are afraid of our food?
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 16:15:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', ' ')or because they are afraid of our food?
there it is, we're afraid of your food! I like Mexican cuisine, plenty of hot spices to kill bacterium. Plus, jalapenos are plenty tasty!
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby rwwff » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 17:08:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'I')'ve always wondered why Americans don't travel abroad more often. You guys make more money than Lebanese, yet you travel less!


Time - ability to take a full week off in one lump is decreasing rapidly.

Inconveniece - international travel is a pain in the butt, most Americans don't even have passports, and most of those have no clue about how to even get a passport.

Purpose - way to much good stuff to see in the States already.

Language - does play a role, adds a level of paranoia into the mix.

Hostility - the world appears, and has for at least a few decades, fairly hostile to America, and Americans aren't willing to say that the foreigners are just mad at our government, and not us as people.

Personally, there's really only one place left I want to see, 'rural' Japan; not Tokyo, thats just a bright NY in pink and purple, I'd love to fly there, buy a nice touring bike, and meander my way from Tokyo, North to Hokkaido over the course of a few weeks. Of course, I've not taken off work for more than 3 days in a row in over a decade, so thats extremely unlikely to ever happen; and by the time I retire, air travel for fun and games will likely be way to expensive to justify the cost.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Zen And The Art Of Debate

Postby TheTurtle » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 18:54:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'C')an anyone explain to me why you guys don't travel given that most of you manifest a desire of doing so?


FWIW, I'll be spending a couple of weeks trekking through China starting in mid-September.

I'm looking forward to China, but I must admit that I am not looking forward to the airport/airplane aspect of getting there and back again. :evil:
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest