by Miki » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 14:33:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')houghts shift, and most of them come from outside, anyway.
Phenomenologists would disagree, but nice try.
Speaking of nice tries, how about if you give it a little more effort? Detachtment from ideas seems to make them more interesting. Tell us about this phenomenologist argument. I'd like to hear it.
Here is my take on this. I can think of two ways to address your question: one is philosophical and the other is psychological (in terms of human cognition).
Here's a rough draft of what a philosophical look at this would involve. As far as I remember (I took my last course in General Philosophy 10 years ago): Back in the XVIIIth century, Western civilization favored Rationalism, the idea that everything can be understood through reason. By the XIXth century, rationalism had shifted into Empircism, the idea that everything can be studied objectively through scientific knowledge. This of course implied that nature was governed by certain universal laws; otherwise, how could one conduct such a systematic study of it?
In the XXth/XXIst centuries human beings have become much more humble. We've realized that nature is not ordered and that some natural phenomena are completely random (eg, at the sub-atomic level). We also realized that we are a minuscle point in the universe, and that what we don't know outweighs what we know by far. As a result, new philosophical worldviews emerged, such as existentialism and phenomenology.
Phenomenology basically says that you can't detach yourself from the object you're studying, because yur perceptionand experience of that object is heavily influenced by who you are, previous experiences, etc. This was a great depart from the Western worldview of the last few centuries. And it has had a great effect on scientific thinking. Once we realized that complete objectivity is almost impossible, our ways of discovering/studying the world start changing. This explains why there's been a shift from quantitative/numerical methods to qualtative methods of study.
So back to your question, in complex social issues like the ones we're discussing, phenomenology would argue that one *can't* study these realities in a completely detached objective matter. Your values/past experience/background would always get in the way.
You might argue that one can assess the objective facts available, and phenomenology would tell you that your assessment of those facts would be coloured by your own biases. Mind you though, that phenomenologists do not consider this a bad thing. On the contrary, it is argued that the best way to study a complex phenomenon is to inmerse yourself in it and experience it.
So perhaps you should travel to Israel and check for yourself what's going on? Or ask an American that has been there?

by greenworm » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 15:06:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat's where it all started, figuring out how to craft obsidian spear points to bring down Mammoths and prey.
Ironic, that may be where it all ends if you believe in the zombie hordes theory.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m no expert on Zen, but I like the idea of koans and the inscrutability of life.
Unfortunately, that is all it is, an idea. Aw, Husserl would be proud of me if he were alive today.

by PenultimateManStanding » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 15:20:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hat's where it all started, figuring out how to craft obsidian spear points to bring down Mammoths and prey.
Ironic, that may be where it all ends if you believe in the zombie hordes theory.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m no expert on Zen, but I like the idea of koans and the inscrutability of life.
Unfortunately, that is all it is, an idea. Aw, Husserl would be proud of me if he were alive today.

Unfortunately, the Mammoths are all gone and so are most of the prey. If the Zen emphasis was on absurdity, I'm with them. Human history seems to be headed to complete absurdity.
by rwwff » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 17:08:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'I')'ve always wondered why Americans don't travel abroad more often. You guys make more money than Lebanese, yet you travel less!
Time - ability to take a full week off in one lump is decreasing rapidly.
Inconveniece - international travel is a pain in the butt, most Americans don't even have passports, and most of those have no clue about how to even get a passport.
Purpose - way to much good stuff to see in the States already.
Language - does play a role, adds a level of paranoia into the mix.
Hostility - the world appears, and has for at least a few decades, fairly hostile to America, and Americans aren't willing to say that the foreigners are just mad at our government, and not us as people.
Personally, there's really only one place left I want to see, 'rural' Japan; not Tokyo, thats just a bright NY in pink and purple, I'd love to fly there, buy a nice touring bike, and meander my way from Tokyo, North to Hokkaido over the course of a few weeks. Of course, I've not taken off work for more than 3 days in a row in over a decade, so thats extremely unlikely to ever happen; and by the time I retire, air travel for fun and games will likely be way to expensive to justify the cost.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
-

rwwff
- Intermediate Crude

-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
- Location: East Texas
-
by TheTurtle » Thu 31 Aug 2006, 18:54:25
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'C')an anyone explain to me why you guys don't travel given that most of you manifest a desire of doing so?
FWIW, I'll be spending a couple of weeks trekking through China starting in mid-September.
I'm looking forward to China, but I must admit that I am not looking forward to the airport/airplane aspect of getting there and back again.

“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
-

TheTurtle
- Heavy Crude

-
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
-