Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Gravity transit ?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby sciencegirl » Fri 18 Aug 2006, 17:39:23

Alecifel, thank you for entertaining my idea. You certainly seem to know alot about the subect, and you looked at my idea without sarcasm and I thank you for that.

Even if it doesn't save you much energy, I think the idea can be improved upon. Like a pulley system to hoist the craft. Solar panels to power a super small engine. A sail if wind conditions are right. A bicycle pedal system if you are in a hurry.

As far as feasablity, it would take to many resources to construct. In light of peak oil probably the best thing to do is have everyone use mass transit until we have a workable alternative energy source. I don't think this will happen until the price of fuel triples, but by then it may be to late.

This is my last post here until tomorrow.
User avatar
sciencegirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby alecifel » Fri 18 Aug 2006, 17:45:46

Given the recent spats of deaths by ppl with heart conditions on gravity rides, I'm thinking more on the freight end than anything else... be sure to pack that FedEx box with extra foamnuts!!!!
Nick J. Allen
Hilton, Oklahoma

"The Chinese have many hells. This one is the hell of valueless currency." -- J. Albertson
User avatar
alecifel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu 02 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Luther, OK

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Pops » Fri 18 Aug 2006, 17:50:41

[s]A cable car uses an external power source to move the cable.

The only power source here is the energy expended by our fingers to talk to our science-girl – who, btw, does not have any concept of science.

See; I just added a few negative calories to her equation.

Calories that we all could use to practice the obvious solution to the problem at hand…

How to walk from here to there.[/s]

Never mind.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby sciencegirl » Fri 18 Aug 2006, 18:20:34

go to hell. I am a chemistry major, I am weak in physics, you would know that if you even bothered to read the thread pops. Why don't you try contributing something useful instead of putting people down. I certainly don't deserve that kind of treatment. I demand you apologize at once. :evil:
User avatar
sciencegirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Omnium » Fri 18 Aug 2006, 18:31:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sciencegirl', 'g')o to hell. I am a chemistry major, I am weak in physics, you would know that if you even bothered to read the thread pops. Why don't you try contributing something useful instead of putting people down. I certainly don't deserve that kind of treatment. I demand you apologize at once. :evil:


Remember don't miss the trees for the woods, look at the bigger picture here. We need Apollo 13 like powerdown, and we need
Star Trek Warp Core like power up, for this peak oil transistion to work...

What do you think about fusion in a jar idea?
Don't laugh, here link: http://www.physorg.com/news10806.html
http://partners.nytimes.com/library/nat ... usion.html
User avatar
Omnium
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri 11 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Omnium » Fri 18 Aug 2006, 18:32:36

And don't forget technologies such as
nano-solar.

http://www.nanosolar.com/

Google even supports it so it must be good.
User avatar
Omnium
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri 11 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby da23 » Fri 18 Aug 2006, 18:40:47

hmm ... i smell ailrickson :roll:
User avatar
da23
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue 06 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby rogerhb » Fri 18 Aug 2006, 19:46:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sciencegirl', 'I') am a chemistry major, I am weak in physics.


Do you not cover entropy, thermodynamics or friction in chemistry then?
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby peaker_2005 » Sat 19 Aug 2006, 03:25:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sciencegirl', 'I') am a chemistry major, I am weak in physics.


Do you not cover entropy, thermodynamics or friction in chemistry then?


Entropy and thermodynamics would probably be in chem. Frictions more a physics thing, though most people understand the concept.

Don't quote me on this - I haven't studied at university level.
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
peaker_2005
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Lighthouse » Sat 19 Aug 2006, 06:37:43

Wasn't the original San Francisco Cable Car driven by a gravity supported system?

In I856, Hallidie built a ditch and flume for a quartz mill, situated at American Bar, two miles above Gray Eagle Bar. The mine was on a hillside eleven hundred feet above the mill. The rock was delivered to the mill in car running by force of gravity. The loaded cars in descending brought up the "empties" for refilling.

Source: http://www.sfmuseum.org/bio/hallidie.html
I am a sarcastic cynic. Some say I'm an asshole. Now that we have that out of the way ...
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Pops » Sat 19 Aug 2006, 17:16:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lighthouse', 'W')asn't the original San Francisco Cable Car driven by a gravity supported system?


Well, American Bar is about 120 miles away and separated by the central valley from San Francisco and that quote had nothing to do with cable cars..

Read your link:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ithin the power house, furnace fires roared under the boilers which were blowing off their overload of hissing steam which seemed to be angered at being harnessed to do such unaccustomed work.

Did you see the part about power house…

Sure, in the sierras where you can get several thousand feet of head you can make power - its called hydro.

The point is the sun heats the ocean which evaporates the water which then moves over land and the mountains cause the moist air to rise which causes it to condense and fall on the mountains and flow into streams which can be dammed and…

In other words there is a primary source of power (solar energy) to get the water to the mountain.

Stick a pole up and climb it and then slide down the cable - the primary source of power to get to where you can enjoy a easy ride is what you have for breakfast because it is the conversion of that breakfast to energy to power your legs which is overcoming gravity.

Geez, I didn't even take physics in high school.


Oh yea, I was ordered to apologize:

I apologize.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby PolestaR » Sat 19 Aug 2006, 18:06:01

By my rough estimates it takes 7 Calories to climb a 30m high ladder if youre 90kg ... you can walk slowly (3.2kph) 100metres with that same amount of energy over 2 minutes.

If anything it may be a faster mode of travel in some instances and use less energy than some methods of travel.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Lighthouse » Sat 19 Aug 2006, 18:10:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'W')ell, American Bar is about 120 miles away and separated by the central valley from San Francisco and that quote had nothing to do with cable cars..


What has the distance of American Bar to to with the subject we are discussing here? Gravity driven Transport systems. Andrew Smith Hallidie based his SF Cable Car design on the experiences he had with the 100% gravity driven system of American Bay.

And I clearly said:

"Wasn't the original San Francisco Cable Car driven by a gravity supported system?" I did not say gravity driven

For SF Hallidie needed another power-source because the uphill cars were not necessarily empty and the downhill cars not necessarily full.

Btw, I. familiar with Hallidies work because the subway in Munich is based on his work. The tunnels leaving a station goes downhill and arriving at the next station uphill. This makes the subway system im Munich more energy efficient.

Of course all of that does not make the "slope rope on a pole" idea viable...
I am a sarcastic cynic. Some say I'm an asshole. Now that we have that out of the way ...
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Pops » Sat 19 Aug 2006, 20:48:15

I misunderstood your point, lighthouse. I misinterpreted "supported" as "powered" instead of "assisted".

I should have read closer, that was the best citation on this thread.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby azreal60 » Sun 20 Aug 2006, 01:31:52

Incidently, I highly doubt anyone minds using this forum as a personal brainstorming session.

There is no such thing as thinking too much. There are already plenty of people thinking too little to make up for you...
Azreal60
azreal60
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sat 26 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Madison,Wisconsin

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Mon 21 Aug 2006, 02:17:28

8) I've figured it out.

Okay, since nobody wants to climb, lets let gravity do all the work.


Think Cirque du Soleil trapeze high-wire act.

Imagine a queue line at the bottom of the pole. First person has to get up by some conventional method. Now, the only thing is, in order for the system to work, someone must be waiting to go up next.

Only the first person has to climb (be hoisted, whatever) to the top. For the first 300 or so feet of his drop, imagine a tether connected to him which pulls up the next person in queue up as his weight drops (usnig pulleys or some shit). After x amount of feet, the tether disconnects- x being the distance required to pull the next passenger up to the top.

Next guy tethers up, jumps aboard... etc.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

Now imagine the entire setup has two channels (upstream and downstream). So we can really get some circularity. And safety nets.

BTW, I have some experience in ziplines. The common failure point was always the line/vehicle interface. When I was a kid we'd tie rope from the second story deck to the fence and ride down holding onto a piece of PVC pipe. Eventually the rop would burn through the pipe.

Fast forward to college, with steel-braided line and harness to ball-bearing pulley. Man that thing was super fast. I think it took about 150 continuous runs over one drunken party before the pulley heated up enough to cause bearing failure.

Mag-lev line? Then the problem is air braking. How do you STOP? Hit a huge air pillow downstream and tumble down an aircraft-style escape chute?

I would definitely pay a $1 for this kind of fun.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby sciencegirl » Mon 21 Aug 2006, 10:40:21

The problem itself is not aways a matter of eneregy. Yes it does cost energy to climb up before you slide down the cable, but which method would get you there quicker, walking 10 kilometers or climbing a 150 meters and gliding 10 kilometers. You can also argue that you could just drive there, but driving a car takes alot of petro energy. Would a gravity cable car use more energy or less energy than a car, and how much. Could you eliminate energy use all together by using alternative energy with a gravity cable car, like solar. (Even wind power if the cable car is high enough off the ground)

The point is that their are alot of things you can try, but you don't know how viable they can be until you try. As for taking math and physics, I have taken some coarses (the required ones) and I passed them, but math was never my thing, I plain stink at most of it, though I have know trouble with chemical equations.
User avatar
sciencegirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Niagara » Mon 21 Aug 2006, 12:27:44

Sciencegirl, I did some kinematics on your cable car. At first I guessed the ride would be slow and boring because the acceleration would be very small. Was I surprised! Let's ignore rolling friction and wind resistance.

Assuming a 150m drop over 10km, the acceleration would be the sine of the downslope * g (9.8m/s/s)
(for small angles sin theta = tan theta)

a=(150/10000) * 9.8
=.15 m/s/s ; the acceleration of the tram

using d=.5at^2

t=sqr(2d/a)
=sqr(2*10000/.15)
=365 seconds

i.e., the 10km trip will take only 6 minutes. That's cool! Much faster than out local bus transit

Now, let's look at the final velocity on arrival at the tram station.

v^2 = 2*a*d
or
v=sqr(2*a*d)
=sqr(2*.15*10000)
=54 m/s

Cool! We arrive at a screaming 200km/h

I love it. Sign me up for a commuter pass on your tram!
User avatar
Niagara
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Thu 17 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mt. Hubbert Scenic Lookout

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby sciencegirl » Mon 21 Aug 2006, 12:52:54

Wow, your good at math. Thanx for the calculations. I never imagined it would be such a speedy trip. It probably would have taken 5 hours had i walked the 10 kilometers. There would still be the matter of raising the craft back up for the return trip, but I am sure that a couple of pulleys could manage that easily enough.
User avatar
sciencegirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Gravity transit ?

Unread postby Falconoffury » Mon 21 Aug 2006, 15:45:05

I think some posters here are being unfair to this idea and the person suggesting it. I don't think anyone here said that this would be a solution to anything. I see it as simply an interesting mode of transport.

The easiest way to increase the efficiency of such a device would be to decrease the weight of the vehicle which is attached to the cable. I imagine that a chair with a seatbelt and part to attach to the cable could accomplish the task. If I were to carry a 25 pound chair up 100 meters of stairs to get myself 10 miles, that sounds like it would be worth it. It would be kind of like a one man rollercoaster.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests