by nth » Mon 24 Jul 2006, 17:59:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', '
')We are on the positive side on the rent/interest curve, so we keep on renting and putting money aside to buy a house lateron. Of course we miss out on the housing price increases. But for me that is an acceptable tradeoff for the security gained.
If you have saved that money and put in an investment vehicle, you should come out okay. Housing price and good mutual funds are not that big of difference, unless you happen to buy low and sell high in real estate. Otherwise, over time, they will even out. I only recommend buying house if your rental is higher than buying after considering your tax situation.
marko,
Maybe I wasn't being clear.
I said in SF area, you can buy a place and make it economical.
I agree with you that if you don't sacrifice life style, renting is better.
I further stated that if you are better off renting, then to rent a cheaper unit and invest the price difference. Which is same thing as you stated now.
The example I give, you are better off buying than renting as obviously if you can easily afford $250k house, your income tax is quite high for federal and state taxes. Reducing those taxes will yield more than the earnings you get in most investment choices you have.
Your house is the biggest investment you will ever make. It is possible to lose money or fail to realize gains. Historically, this is not an issue on the East or West Coast.
The taxes on your non home investment is huge. You don't get any income tax breaks in form of lower tax rate and deductibles. You don't get any capital gains tax breaks either. In a normal investment vehicle/account, you get tax going into the account and tax again when you withdrawl. Of course, I am talking in generality. Your specific case may be different.